[Digital vaccination management systems may improve immunization rates in primary healthcare].

Jörg Schelling, Isabella Thorvaldsson, Linda Sanftenberg
Author Information
  1. Jörg Schelling: Gemeinschaftspraxis Martinsried, Röntgenstraße 2, 82152, Martinsried, Deutschland. joerg.schelling@med.uni-muenchen.de.
  2. Isabella Thorvaldsson: Praxis Dr. Böhm, München, Deutschland.
  3. Linda Sanftenberg: Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, München, Deutschland.

Abstract

In 2018, the Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO) included various practice-relevant procedures in their recommendations, such as correct vaccination management. Vaccination management thereby follows the established quality management (QM) standards of DIN EN ISO 9000 ff. and may be promoted through the implementation of vaccination software systems.This article evaluates the significance and feasibility of standardized vaccination management in the daily practice of physicians in primary healthcare. Consequently, a selective literature research was conducted, including public recommendations, clinical trials, observational studies, and systematic reviews.Four levels of vaccination management can be identified: based on the patient, the vaccine, the personnel, and the storage. Many studies indicate an increase of immunization rates in Germany after the implementation of reminder and recall systems for healthcare workers and patients. Additionally, such software solutions might provide assistance in further aspects of vaccination management, such as stock documentation, constant follow-up orders or medical billing terms. Although many physicians in the primary healthcare system strive for a high quality vaccination process, the importance of the mentioned QM criteria is underestimated in Germany and the usage of vaccination software is rather uncommon.To improve the daily workflow in primary healthcare and to achieve a long-term increase of immunization rates in Germany, vaccination management should be promoted. Improvements could be achieved, especially through the use of appropriate digital vaccination management systems.

Keywords

References

  1. Robert Koch-Institut (2018) Aktuelles aus der KV-Impfsurveillance – Impfquoten ausgewählter Schutzimpfungen in Deutschland. Epidemiol Bull 1:1–18
  2. Wahle K (2009) Aufgabe und Verantwortung des Hausarztes bei der Impfkontrolle. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 134:65–70 [DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1220212]
  3. Ständige Impfkommission (2018) Empfehlungen der Ständigen Impfkommission (STIKO) am Robert Koch-Institut. Epid Bull 34:335–382. https://doi.org/10.17886/EpiBull-2018-042 [DOI: 10.17886/EpiBull-2018-042]
  4. Frühwein M (2015) Qualitätsmanagement in Arztpraxen: Entwicklung eines Moduls „Impfen“ auf Basis von DIN EN ISO 9000 ff. Apollon Hochschule der Gesundheitswirtschaft, Bremen
  5. Parzeller M, Wenk M, Zedler B, Rothschild M (2009) Aufklärung und Einwilligung des Patienten: Nach Maßgaben aktueller höchstrichterlicher und oberlandesgerichtlicher Rechtsprechung. Dtsch Arztebl Int 1:29
  6. Impfmedizin GZFD (2018) MFA-Onlinekurs zur zertifizierten Impfassistenten. https://www.besser-impfen.de . Zugegriffen: 8. Jan. 2019
  7. Weltermann BM, Markic M, Thielmann A, Gesenhues S, Hermann M (2014) Vaccination management and vaccination errors: a representative online-survey among primary care physicians. PLoS ONE 9:e105119 [DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105119]
  8. Thielmann A, Sikora M, Schnell U, Gesenhues S, Weltermann B (2017) Vaccine refrigerator and vaccine management in general practices: a representative, web-based survey among general practitioners (keep cool I). Gesundheitswesen 79:279–285 [PMID: 26158344]
  9. World Health Organization (2018) Effective vaccine management (EVM) initiative. http://www.who.int/immunization/programmes_systems/supply_chain/evm/en/index4.html . Zugegriffen: 8. Jan. 2019
  10. Jacobson Vann JC, Jacobson RM, Coyne-Beasley T, Asafu-Adjei JK, Szilagyi PG (2018) Patient reminder and recall interventions to improve immunization rates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003941.pub3 [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003941.pub3]
  11. Szilagyi P, Vann J, Bordley C et al (2002) Interventions aimed at improving immunization rates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003941 [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003941]
  12. Pennant KN, Costa JJ, Fuhlbrigge AL et al (2015) Improving influenza and pneumococcal vaccination rates in ambulatory specialty practices. Open Forum Infect Dis 2:ofv119 [DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofv119]
  13. Thorvaldsson I (2018) Impfspezifisches Qualitätsmanagment in niedergelassenen Praxen zur Verbesserung der Impfquoten. Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München (Dissertation)
  14. Amirthalingam G, White J, Ramsay M (2012) Measuring childhood vaccine coverage in England: the role of Child Health Information Systems. Euro Surveill 17:20149 [PMID: 22551461]
  15. Edelstein M, Pebody R (2014) Can we achieve high uptakes of influenza vaccination of healthcare workers in hospitals? A cross-sectional survey of acute NHS trusts in England. Epidemiol Infect 142:438–447 [DOI: 10.1017/S095026881300112X]
  16. Dumit EM, Novillo-Ortiz D, Contreras M, Velandia M, Danovaro-Holliday MC (2018) The use of ehealth with immunizations: an overview of systematic reviews. Vaccine 36:7923–7928 [DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.06.076]
  17. Bundesvereinigung K (2019) Mein PraxisCheck Thema: Impfen. https://www.kbv.de/html/13789.php . Zugegriffen: 8. Jan. 2019
  18. Thiesemann-Reith H (2012) Steigerung von Impfraten durch elektronische Impfplaner – Teil I Impfquoten bei chronisch kranken Personen. In: Impfbrief.de. InMed, Berlin

MeSH Term

Database Management Systems
Electronic Health Records
Germany
Humans
Immunization
Immunization Programs
Primary Health Care
Quality Improvement
Quality of Health Care
Reminder Systems
Vaccination

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0vaccinationmanagementsystemshealthcareprimaryVaccinationsoftwareimmunizationratesGermanyrecommendationsqualityQMmaypromotedimplementationdailyphysiciansstudiesincreasereminderimprove2018StandingCommitteeSTIKOincludedvariouspractice-relevantprocedurescorrecttherebyfollowsestablishedstandardsDINENISO9000 ffThisarticleevaluatessignificancefeasibilitystandardizedpracticeConsequentlya selectiveliteratureresearchconductedincludingpublicclinicaltrialsobservationalsystematicreviewsFourlevelscanidentified:basedpatientvaccinepersonnelstorageManyindicaterecallworkerspatientsAdditionallysolutionsmightprovideassistanceaspectsstockdocumentationconstantfollow-upordersmedicalbillingtermsAlthoughmanysystemstrivea highprocessimportancementionedcriteriaunderestimatedusageratheruncommonToworkflowachievea long-termImprovementsachievedespeciallyuseappropriatedigital[Digitalhealthcare]ElectronicrecordManagementPrimaryQuality

Similar Articles

Cited By (4)