Health care equity and access for marginalised young people: a longitudinal qualitative study exploring health system navigation in Australia.

Fiona Robards, Melissa Kang, Katharine Steinbeck, Catherine Hawke, Stephen Jan, Lena Sanci, Ying Ying Liew, Marlene Kong, Tim Usherwood
Author Information
  1. Fiona Robards: Department of General Practice, Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, PO Box 154, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia. fiona.robards@sydney.edu.au. ORCID
  2. Melissa Kang: Department of General Practice, Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, PO Box 154, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia.
  3. Katharine Steinbeck: The University of Sydney, Discipline of Paediatrics and Adolescent Health, Sydney, Australia.
  4. Catherine Hawke: The University of Sydney, School of Rural Health, Orange, Australia.
  5. Stephen Jan: The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
  6. Lena Sanci: Department of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia.
  7. Ying Ying Liew: Department of General Practice, Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, PO Box 154, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia.
  8. Marlene Kong: The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Randwick, Australia.
  9. Tim Usherwood: Department of General Practice, Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, PO Box 154, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Young people have unique social, emotional and developmental needs that require a welcoming and responsive health system, and policies that support their access to health care. Those who are socially or culturally marginalised may face additional challenges in navigating health care, contributing to health inequity. The aim of this study was to understand health system navigation, including the role of technology, for young people belonging to one or more marginalised groups, in order to inform youth health policy in New South Wales, Australia.
METHODS: This qualitative longitudinal study involved 2-4 interviews each over 6 to 12 months with marginalised young people aged 12-24 years living in NSW. The analysis used Nvivo software and grounded theory.
RESULTS: We interviewed 41 young people at baseline who were living in rural or remote areas, sexuality and/or gender diverse, refugee, homeless, and/or Aboriginal. A retention rate of over 85% was achieved. Nineteen belonged to more than one marginalised group allowing an exploration of intersectionality. General practitioners (family physicians) were the most commonly accessed service throughout the study period. Participants were ambivalent about their healthcare journeys. Qualitative analysis identified five themes: 1. Technology brings opportunities to understand, connect and engage with services 2. Healthcare journeys are shaped by decisions weighing up convenience, engagement, effectiveness and affordability. 3. Marginalised young people perceive and experience multiple forms of discrimination leading to forgone care. 4. Multiple marginalisation makes health system navigation more challenging 5. The impact of health system complexity and fragmentation may be mitigated by system knowledge and navigation support CONCLUSIONS: The compounding effects of multiple discrimination and access barriers were experienced more strongly for young people belonging to mutiple marginalised groups. We identify several areas for improving clinical practice and policy. Integrating technology and social media into processes that facilitate access and navigation, providing respectful and welcoming services that recognise diversity, improving health literacy and involving professionals in advocacy and navigation support may help to address these issues.

Keywords

References

  1. J Adolesc Health. 2004 Jan;34(1):97-103 [PMID: 14706412]
  2. Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84(3):167-76 [PMID: 25831962]
  3. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2001 Dec;25(6):494-7 [PMID: 11824981]
  4. J Med Internet Res. 2014 Mar 04;16(3):e66 [PMID: 24594922]
  5. J Prim Health Care. 2013 Mar 01;5(1):11-8 [PMID: 23457690]
  6. BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 7;7(8):e017047 [PMID: 28790044]
  7. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2014 Aug;26(4):435-9 [PMID: 24886952]
  8. J Adolesc Health. 2015 Feb;56(2):251-3 [PMID: 25620310]
  9. Aust J Rural Health. 2014 Feb;22(1):40-4 [PMID: 24460999]
  10. Psychol Med. 2002 Aug;32(6):959-76 [PMID: 12214795]
  11. J Adolesc Health. 2018 Apr;62(4):365-381 [PMID: 29429819]
  12. J Community Health. 2017 Jun;42(3):437-443 [PMID: 27817043]
  13. Australas Psychiatry. 2015 Jun;23(3):293-9 [PMID: 25944761]
  14. Aust J Prim Health. 2011;17(1):54-9 [PMID: 21616025]
  15. J Adolesc Health. 2015 Sep;57(3):288-98 [PMID: 26299556]
  16. Health Educ Res. 2014 Aug;29(4):662-70 [PMID: 24412811]
  17. Int J Equity Health. 2013 Mar 11;12:18 [PMID: 23496984]
  18. Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893-1907 [PMID: 29937585]
  19. Rural Remote Health. 2011;11(1):1582 [PMID: 21319934]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Child
Delivery of Health Care
Female
Health Equity
Health Policy
Health Services Accessibility
Humans
Longitudinal Studies
Male
New South Wales
Qualitative Research
Social Marginalization
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0healthpeoplesystemnavigationmarginalisedyoungcareaccessstudysupportmayYoungsocialwelcomingunderstandtechnologybelongingonegroupsyouthpolicyAustraliaqualitativelongitudinallivinganalysisareasand/orjourneysservicesMarginalisedmultiplediscriminationimprovingHealthBACKGROUND:uniqueemotionaldevelopmentalneedsrequireresponsivepoliciessociallyculturallyfaceadditionalchallengesnavigatingcontributinginequityaimincludingroleorderinformNewSouthWalesMETHODS:involved2-4interviews612 monthsaged12-24 yearsNSWusedNvivosoftwaregroundedtheoryRESULTS:interviewed41baselineruralremotesexualitygenderdiverserefugeehomelessAboriginalretentionrate85%achievedNineteenbelongedgroupallowingexplorationintersectionalityGeneralpractitionersfamilyphysicianscommonlyaccessedservicethroughoutperiodParticipantsambivalenthealthcareQualitativeidentifiedfivethemes:1Technologybringsopportunitiesconnectengage2Healthcareshapeddecisionsweighingconvenienceengagementeffectivenessaffordability3perceiveexperienceformsleadingforgone4Multiplemarginalisationmakeschallenging5impactcomplexityfragmentationmitigatedknowledgeCONCLUSIONS:compoundingeffectsbarriersexperiencedstronglymutipleidentifyseveralclinicalpracticeIntegratingmediaprocessesfacilitateprovidingrespectfulrecognisediversityliteracyinvolvingprofessionalsadvocacyhelpaddressissuesequitypeople:exploringAccessAdolescentsTechnologies

Similar Articles

Cited By