Survey on attitude of dental professionals about plagiarism in Maharashtra, India.

Mahesh Ravindra Khairnar, Umesh Wadgave, Sagar Jatish Shah, Swarali Shah, Vardhaman Mulchand Jain, Sagar Kumbhar
Author Information
  1. Mahesh Ravindra Khairnar: Department of Public Health Dentistry, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University Dental College and Hospital, Sangli, Maharashtra, India.
  2. Umesh Wadgave: Department of Public Health Dentistry, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University Dental College and Hospital, Sangli, Maharashtra, India.
  3. Sagar Jatish Shah: Department of Public Health Dentistry, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University Dental College and Hospital, Sangli, Maharashtra, India.
  4. Swarali Shah: Department of Public Health Dentistry, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University Dental College and Hospital, Sangli, Maharashtra, India.
  5. Vardhaman Mulchand Jain: Department of Public Health Dentistry, A.C.P.M. Dental College and Hospital, Dhule, Maharashtra, India.
  6. Sagar Kumbhar: Department of Public Health Dentistry, Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Dental College, Solapur, Maharashtra, India.

Abstract

PURPOSE: Plagiarism is a type of research misconduct that consists of copying other's work or ideas without giving them proper credit. The rise of Plagiarism cases has become a serious concern in the scientific world. Hence, a cross-sectional survey was carried out to assess the attitude among dental faculty members and postgraduate (PG) students toward Plagiarism. Objectives were to compare the attitudes of dental faculty members and PG students toward Plagiarism and to analyze the association of attitude toward Plagiarism (ATP) with age, gender, and number of publications of the participants.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: ATP was measured using a self-administered questionnaire consisting of two sections; first section consisting of demographic details of the participants and second section consisting of the ATP questionnaire measuring positive attitude, negative attitude, and subjective norms. Ninety faculty members and 126 PG students from four dental institutions participated in the study. The data were analyzed using Chi-square test and linear regression analysis.
RESULTS: PG students showed more positive attitude and less negative ATP as compared to faculty members. Positive ATP decreased with increase in age (β = -0.147; = 0.008), number of publications (β = -0.195; = 0.001), and from males to females (β = -1.209; = 0.044) whereas negative ATP increased with age (β =0.093; = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The study showed negligence of PG students toward Plagiarism which calls for improvement in awareness regarding Plagiarism and research education.

Keywords

References

  1. Indian J Med Res. 2010 Mar;131:373-6 [PMID: 20418548]
  2. Croat Med J. 2010 Jun;51(3):195-201 [PMID: 20564761]
  3. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2010 Nov;41(11):498-505 [PMID: 20672759]
  4. J Med Ethics. 2011 Feb;37(2):113-7 [PMID: 21081306]
  5. Sci Eng Ethics. 2012 Jun;18(2):223-39 [PMID: 22207497]
  6. Account Res. 2012;19(5):269-72 [PMID: 23009267]
  7. Iran J Public Health. 2012;41(11):54-8 [PMID: 23304676]
  8. Acta Inform Med. 2012 Dec;20(4):208-13 [PMID: 23378684]
  9. N Am J Med Sci. 2014 Jan;6(1):6-11 [PMID: 24678470]
  10. J Med Libr Assoc. 2014 Apr;102(2):87-91 [PMID: 24860263]
  11. Mater Sociomed. 2014 Apr;26(2):141-6 [PMID: 24944543]
  12. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2015 Jul;25(7):514-8 [PMID: 26208556]
  13. Indian J Public Health. 2017 Jan-Mar;61(1):33-36 [PMID: 28218160]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0plagiarism=attitudeATPPGstudentsdentalfacultymemberstowardβ0researchageconsistingnegativemisconductscientificnumberpublicationsparticipantsusingquestionnairesectionpositivestudyshowed-0001PURPOSE:Plagiarismtypeconsistscopyingother'sworkideaswithoutgivingpropercreditrisecasesbecomeseriousconcernworldHencecross-sectionalsurveycarriedassessamongpostgraduateObjectivescompareattitudesanalyzeassociationgenderMATERIALSANDMETHODS:measuredself-administeredtwosectionsfirstdemographicdetailssecondmeasuringsubjectivenormsNinety126fourinstitutionsparticipateddataanalyzedChi-squaretestlinearregressionanalysisRESULTS:lesscomparedPositivedecreasedincrease147008195malesfemales-1209044whereasincreased=0093CONCLUSION:negligencecallsimprovementawarenessregardingeducationSurveyprofessionalsMaharashtraIndiaEthicspublishing

Similar Articles

Cited By