Two-stage prepectoral breast reconstruction.

Maurice Y Nahabedian, Steven R Jacobson
Author Information
  1. Maurice Y Nahabedian: National Center for Plastic Surgery, McLean, VA, USA.
  2. Steven R Jacobson: Jacobson Plastic Surgery, Rochester, MN, USA.

Abstract

The options for prosthetic breast reconstruction have expanded and include prepectoral versus subpectoral location of devices as well as performing these operations in one- or two-stage. Current practice patterns are evolving toward the placement of devices in the prepectoral plane in a single stage. The authors' patient selection criteria and surgical technique were reviewed and organized in a step-by-step format. On and off label techniques for acellular dermal matrix (ADM) assembly were reviewed. A review of surgical outcomes was completed. Two-stage reconstruction confers several advantages such as reducing pressure on the mastectomy skin flaps, optimal implant selection for the second stage and the opportunity to revise the reconstruction, all of which can increase the likelihood of a successful outcome. This manuscript will review the indications, techniques, and outcomes following prepectoral, two-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction.

Keywords

References

  1. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Jul;120(1):275-84 [PMID: 17572576]
  2. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Jul;124(1):55-62 [PMID: 19342992]
  3. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Dec;124(6):1743-53 [PMID: 19952629]
  4. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Dec;126(6):1842-7 [PMID: 21124125]
  5. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Nov;128(5):1005-14 [PMID: 21738086]
  6. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 May;129(5):778e-88e [PMID: 22544108]
  7. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 May;129(5):870e-1e [PMID: 22544137]
  8. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Nov;130(5 Suppl 2):44S-53S [PMID: 23096984]
  9. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Nov;132(5):1043-54 [PMID: 23924650]
  10. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Mar;133(3):256e-260e [PMID: 24572868]
  11. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Jun;133(6):738e-747e [PMID: 24867734]
  12. ANZ J Surg. 2017 Jun;87(6):493-498 [PMID: 25266930]
  13. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Apr;135(4):976-9 [PMID: 25811563]
  14. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jun;135(6):1540-4 [PMID: 26017590]
  15. Clin Plast Surg. 2015 Oct;42(4):399-404 [PMID: 26408431]
  16. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Feb;137(2):415-21 [PMID: 26818275]
  17. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Jan 07;3(12):e574 [PMID: 26893999]
  18. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016 Apr;69(4):e77-86 [PMID: 26922050]
  19. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Aug;138(2):329-37 [PMID: 27064232]
  20. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Jul;138(1):15e-21e [PMID: 27348679]
  21. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 May 04;4(5):e698 [PMID: 27579223]
  22. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 May 27;4(5):e708 [PMID: 27579232]
  23. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Jan;139(1):30-39 [PMID: 28027223]
  24. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Feb;139(2):287-294 [PMID: 28121858]
  25. Aesthet Surg J. 2017 May 1;37(5):531-536 [PMID: 28158447]
  26. Breast J. 2017 Sep;23(5):545-553 [PMID: 28295975]
  27. Gland Surg. 2017 Apr;6(2):148-153 [PMID: 28497018]
  28. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Sep;140(3):432-443 [PMID: 28574950]
  29. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Jul 26;5(7):e1433 [PMID: 28831365]
  30. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Nov;140(5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction):51S-59S [PMID: 29064922]
  31. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Dec;140(6S Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction):7S-13S [PMID: 29166342]
  32. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Dec;140(6S Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction):14S-21S [PMID: 29166343]
  33. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Dec;140(6S Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction):22S-30S [PMID: 29166344]
  34. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Dec;140(6S Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction):39S-42S [PMID: 29166346]
  35. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Dec 28;5(12):e1631 [PMID: 29632799]
  36. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Apr 20;6(4):e1731 [PMID: 29876176]
  37. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Jun 11;6(6):e1797 [PMID: 30276046]
  38. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995 Oct;96(5):1119-23; discussion 1124 [PMID: 7568488]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0reconstructionprepectoralbreastprostheticdevicestwo-stagestageselectionsurgicalreviewedtechniquesacellulardermalmatrixADMreviewoutcomesTwo-stageoptionsexpandedincludeversussubpectorallocationwellperformingoperationsone-Currentpracticepatternsevolvingtowardplacementplanesingleauthors'patientcriteriatechniqueorganizedstep-by-stepformatlabelassemblycompletedconfersseveraladvantagesreducingpressuremastectomyskinflapsoptimalimplantsecondopportunityrevisecanincreaselikelihoodsuccessfuloutcomemanuscriptwillindicationsfollowingAlloDermBreastimplantstissueexpanders

Similar Articles

Cited By (11)