Real-time analysis of the diphtheria outbreak in forcibly displaced Myanmar nationals in Bangladesh.

Flavio Finger, Sebastian Funk, Kate White, M Ruby Siddiqui, W John Edmunds, Adam J Kucharski
Author Information
  1. Flavio Finger: Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. flavio.finger@lshtm.ac.uk. ORCID
  2. Sebastian Funk: Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
  3. Kate White: M��decins Sans Fronti��res, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  4. M Ruby Siddiqui: M��decins Sans Fronti��res, London, UK.
  5. W John Edmunds: Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
  6. Adam J Kucharski: Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Between August and December 2017, more than 625,000 Rohingya from Myanmar fled into Bangladesh, settling in informal makeshift camps in Cox's Bazar district and joining 212,000 Rohingya already present. In early November, a diphtheria outbreak hit the camps, with 440 reported cases during the first month. A rise in cases during early December led to a collaboration between teams from M��decins sans Fronti��res-who were running a provisional diphtheria treatment centre-and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine with the goal to use transmission dynamic models to forecast the potential scale of the outbreak and the resulting resource needs.
METHODS: We first adjusted for delays between symptom onset and case presentation using the observed distribution of reporting delays from previously reported cases. We then fit a compartmental transmission model to the adjusted incidence stratified by age group and location. Model forecasts with a lead time of 2 weeks were issued on 12, 20, 26 and 30 December and communicated to decision-makers.
RESULTS: The first forecast estimated that the outbreak would peak on 19 December in Balukhali camp with 303 (95% posterior predictive interval 122-599) cases and would continue to grow in Kutupalong camp, requiring a bed capacity of 316 (95% posterior predictive interval (PPI) 197-499). On 19 December, a total of 54 cases were reported, lower than forecasted. Subsequent forecasts were more accurate: on 20 December, we predicted a total of 912 cases (95% PPI 367-2183) and 136 (95% PPI 55-327) hospitalizations until the end of the year, with 616 cases actually reported during this period.
CONCLUSIONS: Real-time modelling enabled feedback of key information about the potential scale of the epidemic, resource needs and mechanisms of transmission to decision-makers at a time when this information was largely unknown. By 20 December, the model generated reliable forecasts and helped support decision-making on operational aspects of the outbreak response, such as hospital bed and staff needs, and with advocacy for control measures. Although modelling is only one component of the evidence base for decision-making in outbreak situations, suitable analysis and forecasting techniques can be used to gain insights into an ongoing outbreak.

Keywords

References

  1. Science. 1982 Feb 26;215(4536):1053-60 [PMID: 7063839]
  2. PLoS Comput Biol. 2018 Aug 15;14(8):e1006211 [PMID: 30110322]
  3. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018 May;98(5):1489-1497 [PMID: 29532773]
  4. PLoS Curr. 2015 Feb 10;7: [PMID: 25737806]
  5. Epidemiology. 2017 Jan;28(1):136-144 [PMID: 27748685]
  6. Epidemics. 2018 Mar;22:13-21 [PMID: 28958414]
  7. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006 Nov;75(5):973-7 [PMID: 17123999]
  8. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018 May;98(5):1214-1215 [PMID: 29611508]
  9. J R Soc Interface. 2010 Jan 6;7(42):67-79 [PMID: 19364721]
  10. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013 Jul 26;62(29):581-6 [PMID: 23884344]
  11. BMC Med. 2018 Oct 18;16(1):177 [PMID: 30333039]
  12. Lancet. 2004 Nov 27-Dec 3;364(9449):1974-83 [PMID: 15567014]
  13. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 May 26;372(1721): [PMID: 28396473]
  14. Int J Infect Dis. 2018 Jun;71:122-123 [PMID: 29871739]
  15. Infect Dis Model. 2017 Aug;2(3):379-398 [PMID: 29250607]
  16. PeerJ. 2018 Apr 02;6:e4583 [PMID: 29629244]

Grants

  1. /Wellcome Trust
  2. 206250/Z/17/Z/Wellcome Trust

MeSH Term

Bangladesh
Diphtheria
Disease Outbreaks
Humans
Myanmar

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0Decemberoutbreakcasesmodellingreported95%Bangladeshdiphtheriafirsttransmissionneedsforecasts20PPIReal-time000RohingyaMyanmarcampsearlyforecastpotentialscaleresourceadjusteddelaysmodeltimedecision-makers19campposteriorpredictiveintervalbedtotalinformationdecision-makinganalysisBACKGROUND:August2017625fledsettlinginformalmakeshiftCox'sBazardistrictjoining212alreadypresentNovemberhit440monthriseledcollaborationteamsM��decinssansFronti��res-whorunningprovisionaltreatmentcentre-andLondonSchoolHygieneTropicalMedicinegoalusedynamicmodelsresultingMETHODS:symptomonsetcasepresentationusingobserveddistributionreportingpreviouslyfitcompartmentalincidencestratifiedagegrouplocationModellead2 weeksissued122630communicatedRESULTS:estimatedpeakBalukhali303122-599continuegrowKutupalongrequiringcapacity316197-49954lowerforecastedSubsequentaccurate:predicted912367-218313655-327hospitalizationsendyear616actuallyperiodCONCLUSIONS:enabledfeedbackkeyepidemicmechanismslargelyunknowngeneratedreliablehelpedsupportoperationalaspectsresponsehospitalstaffadvocacycontrolmeasuresAlthoughonecomponentevidencebasesituationssuitableforecastingtechniquescanusedgaininsightsongoingforciblydisplacednationalsDiphtheriaEpidemiologicalHealthhumanitariancrisesInfectiousdiseaseMathematicalRefugees

Similar Articles

Cited By