The "Butterfly" Wrap: A Simplified Technique for Consistent Prosthesis Coverage in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.

Elspeth J R Hill, Donald W Buck
Author Information
  1. Elspeth J R Hill: Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University- St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Mo.
  2. Donald W Buck: Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University- St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Mo.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Here, we describe our simple, systematic, reproducible, and effective method for prosthesis coverage in prepectoral breast reconstruction.
METHODS: Our Butterfly Wrap is a simple technique, which provides prosthesis coverage with a single sheet of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in a reproducible and elegant manner. The wrap design creates an anatomic tear-shaped pocket to guide expansion and encourage lower pole fullness, without ADM folding or bunching for optimal incorporation and minimal overlap. Further, it minimizes waste, allowing for smaller sheets of ADM to be used per breast, and can easily be performed in minimal time on the back table while the mastectomies are being performed, as a means of minimizing cost.
RESULTS: Our technique can be applied to effectively cover all shapes and sizes of expanders and implants, both teardrop and round. As a result, the surgeon need only focus on the critical nuances of prosthesis-based prepectoral breast reconstruction, without the anxiety of how to wrap the prosthesis and what size of ADM to use.
CONCLUSIONS: The Butterfly Wrap is a simple, systematic, reproducible, and effective method for prosthesis coverage in prepectoral reconstruction.

References

  1. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Jul;124(1):174e-6e [PMID: 19568066]
  2. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Feb;125(2):66e-68e [PMID: 20124811]
  3. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015 Apr 07;3(3):e317 [PMID: 25878928]
  4. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015 Dec 09;3(11):e569 [PMID: 26893994]
  5. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Jan 07;3(12):e574 [PMID: 26893999]
  6. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016 Apr;69(4):e77-86 [PMID: 26922050]
  7. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Feb;139(2):287-294 [PMID: 28121858]
  8. Burns. 2017 Sep;43(6):1149-1154 [PMID: 28153583]
  9. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Nov;140(5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction):51S-59S [PMID: 29064922]
  10. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Dec;140(6S Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction):7S-13S [PMID: 29166342]
  11. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Dec;140(6S Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction):22S-30S [PMID: 29166344]
  12. Ann Plast Surg. 2018 May;80(5):487-492 [PMID: 29489539]
  13. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Apr 4;6(4):e1712 [PMID: 29876165]
  14. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Apr 20;6(4):e1731 [PMID: 29876176]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0prosthesisADMsimplereproduciblecoverageprepectoralbreastreconstructionsystematiceffectivemethodButterflyWraptechniquewrapwithoutminimalcanperformedBACKGROUND:describeMETHODS:providessinglesheetacellulardermalmatrixelegantmannerdesigncreatesanatomictear-shapedpocketguideexpansionencouragelowerpolefullnessfoldingbunchingoptimalincorporationoverlapminimizeswasteallowingsmallersheetsusedpereasilytimebacktablemastectomiesmeansminimizingcostRESULTS:appliedeffectivelycovershapessizesexpandersimplantsteardroproundresultsurgeonneedfocuscriticalnuancesprosthesis-basedanxietysizeuseCONCLUSIONS:"Butterfly"Wrap:SimplifiedTechniqueConsistentProsthesisCoveragePrepectoralBreastReconstruction

Similar Articles

Cited By (2)