Prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms in nursing homes in Belgium in 2015.

Katrien Latour, Te-Din Huang, Béatrice Jans, Catherine Berhin, Pierre Bogaerts, Audrey Noel, Claire Nonhoff, Magali Dodémont, Olivier Denis, Margareta Ieven, Katherine Loens, Didier Schoevaerdts, Boudewijn Catry, Youri Glupczynski
Author Information
  1. Katrien Latour: Operational Directorate Epidemiology & Public Health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium. ORCID
  2. Te-Din Huang: National Reference Centre for antibiotic resistant Gram-negative bacilli, Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Namur, Université catholique de Louvain, Yvoir, Belgium.
  3. Béatrice Jans: Operational Directorate Epidemiology & Public Health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
  4. Catherine Berhin: National Reference Centre for antibiotic resistant Gram-negative bacilli, Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Namur, Université catholique de Louvain, Yvoir, Belgium.
  5. Pierre Bogaerts: National Reference Centre for antibiotic resistant Gram-negative bacilli, Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Namur, Université catholique de Louvain, Yvoir, Belgium.
  6. Audrey Noel: National Reference Centre for antibiotic resistant Gram-negative bacilli, Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Namur, Université catholique de Louvain, Yvoir, Belgium.
  7. Claire Nonhoff: National Reference Centre for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and staphylococci, Department of Clinical Microbiology, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
  8. Magali Dodémont: National Reference Centre for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and staphylococci, Department of Clinical Microbiology, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
  9. Olivier Denis: Ecole de Santé Publique, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
  10. Margareta Ieven: National Reference Centre for vancomycin-resistant enterococci, Department of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium.
  11. Katherine Loens: National Reference Centre for vancomycin-resistant enterococci, Department of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium.
  12. Didier Schoevaerdts: Department of Geriatric Medicine, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Namur, Université catholique de Louvain, Mont-Godinne, Belgium.
  13. Boudewijn Catry: Operational Directorate Epidemiology & Public Health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
  14. Youri Glupczynski: National Reference Centre for antibiotic resistant Gram-negative bacilli, Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Namur, Université catholique de Louvain, Yvoir, Belgium.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Following two studies conducted in 2005 and 2011, a third prevalence survey of multidrug-resistant microorganisms (MDRO) was organised in Belgian nursing homes (NHs) using a similar methodology. The aim was to measure the prevalence of carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBLE) and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) in NH residents. Risk factors for MDRO carriage were also explored.
METHODS: Up to 51 randomly selected residents per NH were screened for MDRO carriage by trained local nurses between June and October 2015. Rectal swabs were cultured for ESBLE, CPE and VRE, while pooled samples of nose, throat and perineum and chronic wound swabs were obtained for culture of MRSA. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, molecular detection of resistance genes and strain genotyping were performed. Significant risk factors for MDRO colonization MDRO was determined by univariate and multivariable analysis.
RESULTS: Overall, 1447 residents from 29 NHs were enrolled. The mean weighted prevalence of ESBLE and MRSA colonization was 11.3% and 9.0%, respectively. Co-colonization occurred in 1.8% of the residents. VRE and CPE carriage were identified in only one resident each. Impaired mobility and recent treatment with fluoroquinolones or with combinations of sulphonamides and trimethoprim were identified as risk factors for ESBLE carriage, while for MRSA these were previous MRSA carriage/infection, a stay in several different hospital wards during the past year, and a recent treatment with nitrofuran derivatives. Current antacid use was a predictor for both ESBL and MRSA carriage.
CONCLUSIONS: In line with the evolution of MRSA and ESBL colonization/infection in hospitals, a decline in MRSA carriage and an increase in ESBLE prevalence was seen in Belgian NHs between 2005 and 2015. These results show that a systemic approach, including surveillance and enhancement of infection control and antimicrobial stewardship programs is needed in both acute and chronic care facilities.

References

  1. Epidemiol Infect. 2016 Mar;144(4):695-702 [PMID: 26260355]
  2. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Aug;57(8):4010-8 [PMID: 23752516]
  3. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999 May;20(5):362-6 [PMID: 10349960]
  4. Nature. 2000 Aug 17;406(6797):762-7 [PMID: 10963605]
  5. Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Sep 1;49(5):682-90 [PMID: 19622043]
  6. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Jul;37(7):761-7 [PMID: 27052880]
  7. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009 Dec;30(12):1172-9 [PMID: 19835474]
  8. Am J Infect Control. 2016 Feb;44(2):126-30 [PMID: 26631643]
  9. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Nov;31 Suppl 1:S59-62 [PMID: 20929373]
  10. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Apr;71(4):1076-82 [PMID: 26755493]
  11. PLoS One. 2013 May 30;8(5):e64908 [PMID: 23738011]
  12. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Dec;37(12):1485-1488 [PMID: 27671022]
  13. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009 Aug;30(8):786-9 [PMID: 19591581]
  14. J Clin Nurs. 2017 Dec;26(23-24):4822-4829 [PMID: 28382638]
  15. Arch Public Health. 2016 Nov 7;74:47 [PMID: 27826443]
  16. J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Oct 25;56(11): [PMID: 30135233]
  17. Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Nov;57(9):1246-52 [PMID: 23946222]
  18. PLoS One. 2014 Apr 08;9(4):e93285 [PMID: 24714643]
  19. Int J Med Microbiol. 2013 Dec;303(8):405-9 [PMID: 23770266]
  20. Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Feb 1;64(3):361-363 [PMID: 27965302]
  21. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2017 Nov;50(5):649-656 [PMID: 28782707]
  22. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007 Feb;59(2):165-74 [PMID: 17158117]
  23. Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Apr 1;42(7):925-34 [PMID: 16511754]
  24. Acta Clin Belg. 2014 Jan-Feb;69(1):30-2 [PMID: 24635396]
  25. Gut. 2016 May;65(5):749-56 [PMID: 26719299]
  26. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Jan;66(1):37-47 [PMID: 21036771]
  27. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012 Dec;33(12):1193-9 [PMID: 23143355]
  28. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010 Jul;16(7):934-44 [PMID: 19686277]
  29. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Feb;71(2):348-52 [PMID: 26518051]
  30. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009 Dec;64(6):1299-306 [PMID: 19808236]
  31. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83 [PMID: 3558716]
  32. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009 Sep;64(3):635-41 [PMID: 19549667]
  33. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017 Dec;23(12):961-967 [PMID: 28412380]
  34. Gut. 2016 May;65(5):740-8 [PMID: 26657899]
  35. Clin Infect Dis. 2002 Feb 15;34(4):441-6 [PMID: 11797169]
  36. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2005 Feb;26(2):191-5 [PMID: 15756891]
  37. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012 Sep;18(9):1503-7 [PMID: 22932472]
  38. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Jan;72(1):56-59 [PMID: 27634917]
  39. BMC Infect Dis. 2015 Apr 01;15:168 [PMID: 25887288]
  40. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2009 Jul;10(6):414-8 [PMID: 19560719]
  41. Med J Aust. 2011 Nov 7;195(9):530-3 [PMID: 22060088]
  42. Clin Infect Dis. 2000 Sep;31(3):752-6 [PMID: 11017825]
  43. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013 Jul;68(7):1576-82 [PMID: 23508620]
  44. Genome Med. 2016 Oct 3;8(1):102 [PMID: 27716432]
  45. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2016 Oct 11;5:33 [PMID: 27766146]
  46. Curr Geriatr Rep. 2015 Mar;4(1):87-95 [PMID: 25664233]
  47. Clin Infect Dis. 2000 Dec;31(6):1414-22 [PMID: 11096012]

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Belgium
Cross-Sectional Studies
Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial
Enterobacteriaceae
Enterobacteriaceae Infections
Female
Humans
Male
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Middle Aged
Nursing Homes
Rectum
Risk Factors
Staphylococcal Infections
Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci

Chemicals

Anti-Bacterial Agents

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0MRSAcarriageMDROESBLEprevalenceresidentsNHsVRECPEfactors20152005multidrug-resistantBelgiannursinghomesEnterobacteriaceaeNHswabschronicriskcolonizationidentifiedrecenttreatmentESBLOBJECTIVES:Followingtwostudiesconducted2011thirdsurveymicroorganismsorganisedusingsimilarmethodologyaimmeasuremethicillin-resistantStaphylococcusaureusvancomycin-resistantenterococciextended-spectrumβ-lactamaseproducingcarbapenemase-producingRiskalsoexploredMETHODS:51randomlyselectedperscreenedtrainedlocalnursesJuneOctoberRectalculturedpooledsamplesnosethroatperineumwoundobtainedcultureAntimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingmoleculardetectionresistancegenesstraingenotypingperformedSignificantdeterminedunivariatemultivariableanalysisRESULTS:Overall144729enrolledmeanweighted113%90%respectivelyCo-colonizationoccurred18%oneresidentImpairedmobilityfluoroquinolonescombinationssulphonamidestrimethoprimpreviouscarriage/infectionstayseveraldifferenthospitalwardspastyearnitrofuranderivativesCurrentantacidusepredictorCONCLUSIONS:lineevolutioncolonization/infectionhospitalsdeclineincreaseseenresultsshowsystemicapproachincludingsurveillanceenhancementinfectioncontrolantimicrobialstewardshipprogramsneededacutecarefacilitiesPrevalenceorganismsBelgium

Similar Articles

Cited By