First assessment of the performance of an implantable continuous glucose monitoring system through 180 days in a primarily adolescent population with type 1 diabetes.

Ronnie Aronson, Alexander Abitbol, Katherine S Tweden
Author Information
  1. Ronnie Aronson: LMC Diabetes and Endocrinology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. ORCID
  2. Alexander Abitbol: LMC Diabetes and Endocrinology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  3. Katherine S Tweden: Senseonics, Incorporated, Germantown, Maryland, USA.

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the performance of the Eversense XL implantable continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system through 180���days in a primarily adolescent population with type 1 diabetes (T1D).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective, single-centre, single-arm, 180-day study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of the implantable CGM system in Canadian adolescent and adult subjects with T1D. Accuracy measures included mean absolute relative difference (MARD), 15/15% agreement between CGM glucose and blood glucose measured by Yellow Springs Instruments and surveillance error grid analysis. Adolescent subjects received one sensor in the upper arm and adult subjects received one sensor in each upper arm. In-clinic CGM system accuracy studies were performed every 30���days. The safety assessment included the incidence of adverse events related to either device or the insertion/removal procedure through 180���days.
RESULTS: Thirty-six subjects (30 adolescent/6 adult, 13 female/23 male, mean age 17��������9.2���years, mean body mass index 22��������4���kg/m ) received the CGM system. Overall MARD was 9.4% (95% CI: 8.6%-10.5%). CGM system agreement at 15/15% (N���=���7163) through 60, 120 and 180���days was 82.9% (95% CI: 78.4%-86.1%), 83.6% (95% CI: 80.4%-85.7%) and 83.4% (95% CI: 79.7%-85.5%), respectively. Surveillance error grid analysis showed 98.4% of paired values in clinically acceptable error zones A and B. No insertion/removal or device-related serious adverse events were reported.
CONCLUSION: The Eversense XL CGM system is safe and accurate through 180���days in a primarily adolescent population of subjects with T1D.

Keywords

References

  1. Diabetes Care. 2010 Jan;33(1):17-22 [PMID: 19837791]
  2. Diabetes Care. 2014 Oct;37(10):2702-9 [PMID: 25011947]
  3. Clin Diabetes. 2018 Jan;36(1):50-58 [PMID: 29382979]
  4. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 May;12(3):592-598 [PMID: 29332422]
  5. Diabetes Care. 2017 Feb;40(2):181-187 [PMID: 27899489]
  6. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Jul;21(7):1689-1694 [PMID: 30938036]
  7. JAMA. 2017 Jan 24;317(4):371-378 [PMID: 28118453]
  8. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019 Feb;21(2):66-72 [PMID: 30657336]
  9. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 May;11(3):522-528 [PMID: 28745091]
  10. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 Mar;20(3):197-206 [PMID: 29381090]
  11. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Mar;9(2):339-41 [PMID: 25385947]
  12. Diabetes Care. 2017 Jan;40(1):63-68 [PMID: 27815290]
  13. Pediatr Diabetes. 2018 Nov;19(7):1271-1275 [PMID: 29923262]
  14. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016 May 03;10(3):627-32 [PMID: 26908570]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Blood Glucose
Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring
Canada
Child
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
Female
Glycated Hemoglobin
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Monitoring, Ambulatory
Prospective Studies
Prostheses and Implants
Reproducibility of Results
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult

Chemicals

Blood Glucose
Glycated Hemoglobin A
hemoglobin A1c protein, human

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0CGMsystemglucosesubjects180���daysadolescent95%CI:implantablecontinuousmonitoringprimarilypopulationtype1diabetesT1Dadultmeanerrorreceived4%performanceEversenseXLsafetyincludedMARD15/15%agreementgridanalysisonesensorupperarmassessmentadverseeventsinsertion/removal5%83AIM:investigateMATERIALSANDMETHODS:prospectivesingle-centresingle-arm180-daystudyevaluatedeffectivenessCanadianAccuracymeasuresabsoluterelativedifferencebloodmeasuredYellowSpringsInstrumentssurveillanceAdolescentIn-clinicaccuracystudiesperformedevery30���daysincidencerelatedeitherdeviceprocedureRESULTS:Thirty-six30adolescent/613female/23maleage17��������92���yearsbodymassindex22��������4���kg/mOverall986%-10N���=���716360120829%784%-861%6%804%-857%797%-85respectivelySurveillanceshowed98pairedvaluesclinicallyacceptablezonesBdevice-relatedseriousreportedCONCLUSION:safeaccurateFirst180daysclinicaltrial

Similar Articles

Cited By