The validity of RFID badges measuring face-to-face interactions.

Timon Elmer, Krishna Chaitanya, Prateek Purwar, Christoph Stadtfeld
Author Information
  1. Timon Elmer: Department of Humanities, Social and Political Sciences, ETH Zürich, Weinbergstrasse 109, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland. timon.elmer@gess.ethz.ch. ORCID
  2. Krishna Chaitanya: Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, ETH Zürich, Sternwartstrasse 7, Zurich, 8092, Switzerland.
  3. Prateek Purwar: Department of Humanities, Social and Political Sciences, ETH Zürich, Weinbergstrasse 109, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland.
  4. Christoph Stadtfeld: Department of Humanities, Social and Political Sciences, ETH Zürich, Weinbergstrasse 109, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland.

Abstract

Face-to-face interactions are important for a variety of individual behaviors and outcomes. In recent years, a number of human sensor technologies have been proposed to incorporate direct observations in behavioral studies of face-to-face interactions. One of the most promising emerging technologies is the application of active Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) badges. They are increasingly applied in behavioral studies because of their low costs, straightforward applicability, and moderate ethical concerns. However, despite the attention that RFID badges have recently received, there is a lack of systematic tests on how valid RFID badges are in measuring face-to-face interactions. With two studies, we aim to fill this gap. Study 1 (N = 11) compares how data assessed with RFID badges correspond with video data of the same interactions (construct validity) and how this fit can be improved using straightforward data processing strategies. The analyses show that the RFID badges have a sensitivity of 50%, which can be enhanced to 65% when flickering signals with gaps of less than 75 s are interpolated. The specificity is relatively less affected by this interpolation process (before interpolation 97%, after interpolation 94.7%)-resulting in an improved accuracy of the measurement. In Study 2 (N = 73) we show that self-report data of social interactions correspond highly with data gathered with the RFID badges (criterion validity).

Keywords

References

  1. Soc Sci Med. 2015 Jan;125:40-50 [PMID: 24797692]
  2. Psychol Bull. 2000 Nov;126(6):844-72 [PMID: 11107879]
  3. J Couns Psychol. 2009 Apr;56(2):289-300 [PMID: 20428460]
  4. Alcohol Res Health. 2010;33(1-2):127-43 [PMID: 23579943]
  5. J Urban Health. 2001 Sep;78(3):458-67 [PMID: 11564849]
  6. Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74 [PMID: 843571]
  7. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 Mar;6(2):114-33 [PMID: 21660127]
  8. J Theor Biol. 2011 Feb 21;271(1):166-80 [PMID: 21130777]
  9. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2007 Dec;2(4):396-403 [PMID: 26151975]
  10. Emotion. 2017 Dec;17(8):1166-1180 [PMID: 28358560]
  11. PLoS One. 2010 Jul 15;5(7):e11596 [PMID: 20657651]
  12. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol. 2012;8(1):23-34 [PMID: 22833776]
  13. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 May;7(3):221-37 [PMID: 26168460]
  14. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993 Jul;65(1):45-55 [PMID: 8355141]
  15. Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 29;10(1):1444 [PMID: 31996728]
  16. Psychol Bull. 1995 May;117(3):497-529 [PMID: 7777651]
  17. PLoS One. 2011 Feb 28;6(2):e17144 [PMID: 21386902]
  18. Am J Epidemiol. 1985 May;121(5):744-53 [PMID: 4014166]
  19. BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Jul 22;16:341 [PMID: 27449511]

MeSH Term

Female
Humans
Interpersonal Relations
Male
Radio Frequency Identification Device

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0RFIDbadgesinteractionsdatastudiesface-to-facevalidityinterpolationSocialsensortechnologiesbehavioralstraightforwardmeasuringStudyNcorrespondcanimprovedshowlessFace-to-faceimportantvarietyindividualbehaviorsoutcomesrecentyearsnumberhumanproposedincorporatedirectobservationsOnepromisingemergingapplicationactiveRadioFrequencyIdentificationincreasinglyappliedlowcostsapplicabilitymoderateethicalconcernsHoweverdespiteattentionrecentlyreceivedlacksystematictestsvalidtwoaimfillgap1= 11comparesassessedvideoconstructfitusingprocessingstrategiesanalysessensitivity50%enhanced65%flickeringsignalsgaps75sinterpolatedspecificityrelativelyaffectedprocess97%947%-resultingaccuracymeasurement2= 73self-reportsocialhighlygatheredcriterioninteractionnetworkValidity

Similar Articles

Cited By