Visual attention is not limited to the oculomotor range.

Nina M Hanning, Martin Szinte, Heiner Deubel
Author Information
  1. Nina M Hanning: Allgemeine und Experimentelle Psychologie, Department Psychologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80802 München, Germany; hanning.nina@gmail.com. ORCID
  2. Martin Szinte: Department of Cognitive Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands. ORCID
  3. Heiner Deubel: Allgemeine und Experimentelle Psychologie, Department Psychologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80802 München, Germany.

Abstract

Both patients with eye movement disorders and healthy participants whose oculomotor range had been experimentally reduced have been reported to show attentional deficits at locations unreachable by their eyes. Whereas previous studies were mainly based on the evaluation of reaction times, we measured visual sensitivity before saccadic eye movements and during fixation at locations either within or beyond participants' oculomotor range. Participants rotated their heads to prevent them from performing large rightward saccades. In this posture, an attentional cue was presented inside or outside their oculomotor range. Participants either made a saccade to the cue or maintained fixation while they discriminated the orientation of a visual noise patch. In contrast to previous reports, we found that the cue attracted visual attention regardless of whether it was presented within or beyond participants' oculomotor range during both fixation and saccade preparation. Moreover, when participants aimed to look to a cue that they could not reach with their eyes, we observed no benefit at their actual saccade endpoint. This demonstrates that spatial attention is not coupled to the executed oculomotor program but instead can be deployed unrestrictedly also toward locations to which no saccade can be executed. Our results are compatible with the view that covert and overt attentional orienting are guided by feedback projections of visual and visuomotor neurons of the gaze control system, irrespective of oculomotor limitations.

Keywords

References

  1. Percept Psychophys. 1995 Aug;57(6):787-95 [PMID: 7651803]
  2. Curr Biol. 2004 May 4;14(9):792-5 [PMID: 15120071]
  3. Neuron. 1998 Oct;21(4):761-73 [PMID: 9808463]
  4. Nat Neurosci. 2004 Jan;7(1):56-64 [PMID: 14699418]
  5. Neuron. 2012 Feb 9;73(3):581-94 [PMID: 22325208]
  6. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1982 Aug;8(4):489-501 [PMID: 6214603]
  7. Q J Exp Psychol. 1980 Feb;32(1):3-25 [PMID: 7367577]
  8. Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 21;8(1):9434 [PMID: 29930389]
  9. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 May 2;103(18):7192-7 [PMID: 16632611]
  10. Vision Res. 1996 Jun;36(12):1827-37 [PMID: 8759451]
  11. Nat Commun. 2017 Apr 27;8:15041 [PMID: 28447609]
  12. Curr Biol. 2004 Feb 17;14(4):331-3 [PMID: 14972685]
  13. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jan 18;102(3):524-9 [PMID: 15601760]
  14. Science. 2008 Jul 18;321(5887):414-7 [PMID: 18635806]
  15. Vision Res. 1972 Nov;12(11):1795-808 [PMID: 4627952]
  16. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Oct;41(5):1260-70 [PMID: 26076176]
  17. Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Oct;29:108-112 [PMID: 30731260]
  18. Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Jun;20(6):399-401 [PMID: 27118641]
  19. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2010;33:1-21 [PMID: 20192813]
  20. J Neurophysiol. 2000 Aug;84(2):1103-6 [PMID: 10938333]
  21. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Apr;4(4):138-147 [PMID: 10740278]
  22. Neuropsychologia. 2012 May;50(6):1104-14 [PMID: 22306518]
  23. Brain. 1988 Apr;111 ( Pt 2):267-80 [PMID: 3378136]
  24. J Neurosci. 2005 Oct 12;25(41):9479-87 [PMID: 16221858]
  25. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Dec;38(6):1438-47 [PMID: 22428677]
  26. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1999 Dec;25(6):1673-92 [PMID: 10641315]
  27. Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437-42 [PMID: 9176953]
  28. J Neurophysiol. 1976 Jul;39(4):745-65 [PMID: 823303]
  29. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2002 Nov;34(4):613-7 [PMID: 12564564]
  30. Vision Res. 1995 Jul;35(13):1897-916 [PMID: 7660596]
  31. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Aug;10(8):382-90 [PMID: 16843702]
  32. Neuroreport. 2001 Oct 29;12(15):3283-6 [PMID: 11711871]
  33. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1982 Jun 25;298(1089):187-98 [PMID: 6125970]
  34. J Vis. 2017 May 1;17(5):15 [PMID: 28549352]
  35. PLoS Biol. 2018 Jun 25;16(6):e2006548 [PMID: 29939986]
  36. J Neurophysiol. 1969 Sep;32(5):637-48 [PMID: 4980022]
  37. Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6 [PMID: 9176952]
  38. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1986 Aug;38(3):475-91 [PMID: 3763952]
  39. Exp Brain Res. 1998 Nov;123(1-2):164-71 [PMID: 9835406]
  40. J Vis. 2019 Oct 1;19(12):17 [PMID: 31627212]
  41. Neuropsychologia. 2010 Apr;48(5):1269-76 [PMID: 20036265]
  42. J Neurophysiol. 1996 Aug;76(2):927-52 [PMID: 8871209]
  43. J Neurophysiol. 2004 Jan;91(1):152-62 [PMID: 13679398]
  44. Neuroimage. 2000 Mar;11(3):210-6 [PMID: 10694463]
  45. Trends Neurosci. 2001 May;24(5):295-300 [PMID: 11311383]
  46. Nature. 2003 Jan 23;421(6921):370-3 [PMID: 12540901]
  47. Neuropsychologia. 1987;25(1A):31-40 [PMID: 3574648]
  48. Vision Res. 2011 Jul 1;51(13):1484-525 [PMID: 21549742]

MeSH Term

Adult
Attention
Female
Fixation, Ocular
Humans
Male
Orientation
Saccades

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0oculomotorrangevisualattentioncuesaccadeattentionallocationsfixationeyeparticipantseyespreviouseitherwithinbeyondparticipants'ParticipantssaccadespresentedexecutedcanpatientsmovementdisordershealthywhoseexperimentallyreducedreportedshowdeficitsunreachableWhereasstudiesmainlybasedevaluationreactiontimesmeasuredsensitivitysaccadicmovementsrotatedheadspreventperforminglargerightwardpostureinsideoutsidemademaintaineddiscriminatedorientationnoisepatchcontrastreportsfoundattractedregardlesswhetherpreparationMoreoveraimedlookreachobservedbenefitactualendpointdemonstratesspatialcoupledprograminsteaddeployedunrestrictedlyalsotowardresultscompatibleviewcovertovertorientingguidedfeedbackprojectionsvisuomotorneuronsgazecontrolsystemirrespectivelimitationsVisuallimitedpremotortheory

Similar Articles

Cited By