Influence of High- and Low-Frequency Resistance Training on Lean Body Mass and Muscle Strength Gains in Untrained Men.

Cristiane M C Franco, Marcelo A S Carneiro, Jairo F R de Sousa, Gederson K Gomes, Fábio L Orsatti
Author Information
  1. Cristiane M C Franco: Exercise Biology Research Group (BioEx), Federal University of Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM), Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil; and.
  2. Marcelo A S Carneiro: Exercise Biology Research Group (BioEx), Federal University of Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM), Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil; and.
  3. Jairo F R de Sousa: Exercise Biology Research Group (BioEx), Federal University of Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM), Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil; and.
  4. Gederson K Gomes: Exercise Biology Research Group (BioEx), Federal University of Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM), Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil; and.
  5. Fábio L Orsatti: Exercise Biology Research Group (BioEx), Federal University of Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM), Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil; and.

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Franco, CMC, Carneiro, MAS, de Sousa, JFR, Gomes, GK, and Orsatti, FL. Influence of high- and low-frequency resistance training on lean body mass and muscle strength gains in untrained men. J Strength Cond Res 35(8): 2089-2094, 2021-The aim of this study was to investigate whether high-frequency resistance training (HFRT) performs better in lean body mass (LBM) and muscle strength gains when compared with low-frequency resistance training (LFRT). Eighteen untrained males (height: 1.76 ± 0.05 m, body mass: 78.3 ± 13.5 kg, and age: 22.1 ± 2.2 years) were randomly allocated into HFRT (n = 9) and LFRT (n = 9). Muscle strength {1 repetition maximum (RM) (bench press [BP] and unilateral leg extension [LE])} and LBM (DXA) were assessed at before and after 8 weeks of training. Both groups performed 7 whole-body resistance exercises, standardized to 10 sets per week, 8-12 maximal repetitions, and 90-120 seconds of rest in a 5-day resistance training routine. The LFRT performed a split-body routine, training each specific muscle group once a week. The HFRT performed a total-body routine, training all muscle groups every session and progressed from a training frequency of once per week to a training frequency of 5 times per week. Lean body mass increased without differences between groups (HFRT = 1.0 kg vs. LFRT = 1.5 kg; p = 0.377). Similarly, 1RM increased without differences between groups (right LE, HFRT = 21.2 kg vs. LFRT = 19.7 kg, p = 0.782; BP, HFRT = 7.1 kg vs. LFRT = 4.5 kg, p = 0.293). These findings suggest that in young untrained men, progressing from a training frequency of once per week to a training frequency of 5 times per week with equated volume produces similar gains in LBM and muscle strength as a constant training frequency of once per week, over an 8-week training period.

References

  1. ACSM. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 41: 687–708, 2009.
  2. Barcelos C, Damas F, Nobrega SR, et al. High-frequency resistance training does not promote greater muscular adaptations compared to low frequencies in young untrained men. Eur J Sport Sci 18: 1077–1082, 2018.
  3. Barcelos LC, Nunes PR, de Souza LR, et al. Low-load resistance training promotes muscular adaptation regardless of vascular occlusion, load, or volume. Eur J Appl Physiol 115: 1559–1568, 2015.
  4. Benton MJ, Kasper MJ, Raab SA, Waggener GT, Swan PD. Short-term effects of resistance training frequency on body composition and strength in middle-aged women. J Strength Cond Res 25: 3142–3149, 2011.
  5. Burd NA, Holwerda AM, Selby KC, et al. Resistance exercise volume affects myofibrillar protein synthesis and anabolic signalling molecule phosphorylation in young men. J Physiol 588: 3119–3130, 2010.
  6. Candow DG, Burke DG. Effect of short-term equal-volume resistance training with different workout frequency on muscle mass and strength in untrained men and women. J Strength Cond Res 21: 204–207, 2007.
  7. Counts BR, Buckner SL, Mouser JG, et al. Muscle growth: To infinity and beyond? Muscle Nerve 56: 1022–1030, 2017.
  8. Damas F, Phillips S, Vechin FC, Ugrinowitsch C. A review of resistance training-induced changes in skeletal muscle protein synthesis and their contribution to hypertrophy. Sports Med 45: 801–807, 2015.
  9. Dankel SJ, Mattocks KT, Jessee MB, et al. Frequency: The overlooked resistance training variable for inducing muscle hypertrophy? Sports Med 47: 799–805, 2017.
  10. DiFrancisco-Donoghue J, Werner W, Douris PC. Comparison of once-weekly and twice-weekly strength training in older adults. Br J Sports Med 41: 19–22, 2007.
  11. Gomes GK, Franco CM, Nunes PRP, Orsatti FL. High-frequency resistance training is not more effective than low-frequency resistance training in increasing muscle mass and strength in well-trained men. J Strength Cond Res. Epub ahead of print.
  12. Goto K, Ishii N, Kizuka T, Takamatsu K. The impact of metabolic stress on hormonal responses and muscular adaptations. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37: 955–963, 2005.
  13. Grgic J, Schoenfeld BJ, Davies TB, et al. Effect of resistance training frequency on gains in muscular strength: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med 48:1207–1220, 2018.
  14. Grgic J, Schoenfeld BJ, Skrepnik M, Davies TB, Mikulic P. Effects of rest interval duration in resistance training on measures of muscular strength: A systematic review. Sports Med 48:137–151, 2017.
  15. Hackett DA, Johnson NA, Chow CM. Training practices and ergogenic aids used by male bodybuilders. J Strength Cond Res 27: 1609–1617, 2013.
  16. Hartman MJ, Clark B, Bemben DA, Kilgore JL, Bemben MG. Comparisons between twice-daily and once-daily training sessions in male weight lifters. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2: 159–169, 2007.
  17. Hunter GR. Changes in body composition, body build and performance associated with different weight training frequencies in males and females. Strength Cond J 7: 26–28, 1985.
  18. Kraemer WJ, Fry A, Ratamess N, French D. Strength testing: Development and evaluation of methodology. Physiological Assessment Human Fitness 2: 119–150, 1995.
  19. Krieger JW. Single vs. multiple sets of resistance exercise for muscle hypertrophy: A meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res 24: 1150–1159, 2010.
  20. Kumar V, Atherton PJ, Selby A, et al. Muscle protein synthetic responses to exercise: Effects of age, volume, and intensity. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 67: 1170–1177, 2012.
  21. Kumar V, Selby A, Rankin D, et al. Age-related differences in the dose-response relationship of muscle protein synthesis to resistance exercise in young and old men. J Physiol 587: 211–217, 2009.
  22. MacDougall JD, Gibala MJ, Tarnopolsky MA, et al. The time course for elevated muscle protein synthesis following heavy resistance exercise. Can J Appl Physiol 20: 480–486, 1995.
  23. McKenzie GG. Effects of frequency of weight training on muscle strength enhancement. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 21: 432–436, 1981.
  24. McLester JR, Bishop E, Guilliams M. Comparison of 1 day and 3 days per week of equal-volume resistance training in experienced subjects. J Strength Cond Res 14: 273–281, 2000.
  25. Mitchell CJ, Churchward-Venne TA, West DW, et al. Resistance exercise load does not determine training-mediated hypertrophic gains in young men. J Appl Physiol 113: 71–77, 2012.
  26. Nissen SB, Magidson T, Gross K, Bergstrom CT. Publication bias and the canonization of false facts. Elife 5: e21451, 2016.
  27. Orsatti FL, Nahas E, Maesta N, et al. Effects of resistance training frequency on body composition and metabolics and inflammatory markers in overweight postmenopausal women. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 54: 317–325, 2014.
  28. Ostrowski KJ, Wilson GJ, Weatherby R, Murphy PW, Lyttle AD. The effect of weight training volume on hormonal output and muscular size and function. J Strength Cond Res 11: 148–154, 1997.
  29. Peterson MD, Rhea MR, Alvar BA. Applications of the dose-response for muscular strength development: A review of meta-analytic efficacy and reliability for designing training prescription. J Strength Cond Res 19: 950–958, 2005.
  30. Phillips SM, Tipton K, Ferrando AA, Wolfe RR. Resistance training reduces the acute exercise-induced increase in muscle protein turnover. Am J Physiol 276: E118–E124, 1999.
  31. Phillips SM, Tipton KD, Aarsland A, Wolf SE, Wolfe RR. Mixed muscle protein synthesis and breakdown after resistance exercise in humans. Am J Physiol 273: E99–E107, 1997.
  32. Ralston GW, Kilgore L, Wyatt FB, Baker JS. The effect of weekly set volume on strength gain: A meta-analysis. Sports Med 47: 2585–2601, 2017.
  33. Schoenfeld BJ. The mechanisms of muscle hypertrophy and their application to resistance training. J Strength Cond Res 24: 2857–2872, 2010.
  34. Schoenfeld BJ, Ogborn D, Krieger JW. Effects of resistance training frequency on measures of muscle hypertrophy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med 46: 1689–1697, 2016.
  35. Schoenfeld BJ, Ogborn D, Krieger JW. Dose-response relationship between weekly resistance training volume and increases in muscle mass: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sports Sci 35: 1073–1082, 2017.
  36. Schoenfeld BJ, Ratamess NA, Peterson MD, Contreras B, Tiryaki-Sonmez G. Influence of resistance training frequency on muscular adaptations in well-trained men. J Strength Cond Res 29: 1821–1829, 2015.
  37. Serra R, Saavedra F, Jotta B, et al. The influence weekly resistance training frequency on strength and body composition. Int J Sports Sci 8: 19–24, 2018.
  38. Thomas MH, Burns SP. Increasing lean mass and strength: A comparison of high frequency strength training to lower frequency strength training. Int J Exercise Sci 9: 159, 2016.
  39. Thompson FE, Byers T. Dietary assessment resource manual. J Nutr 124: 2245S–2317S, 1994.
  40. USDA. Food Composition Database. United State Department of Agriculture, 2007. Available at: https://www.ars.usda.gov/ . Accessed March 1, 2018.

MeSH Term

Adult
Body Composition
Exercise
Humans
Male
Muscle Strength
Muscle, Skeletal
Resistance Training
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0training=kgweekHFRTLFRTperresistancemuscle105frequencybodystrengthgroupsmassgainsuntrainedLBM±2performed7routinevspInfluencelow-frequencyleanmenStrength8n9MuscletimesLeanincreasedwithoutdifferencesABSTRACT:FrancoCMCCarneiroMASdeSousaJFRGomesGKOrsattiFLhigh-JCondRes35:2089-20942021-Theaimstudyinvestigatewhetherhigh-frequencyperformsbettercomparedEighteenmalesheight:7605mmass:78313age:22yearsrandomlyallocated{1repetitionmaximumRMbenchpress[BP]unilaterallegextension[LE]}DXAassessedweekswhole-bodyexercisesstandardized10sets8-12maximalrepetitions90-120secondsrest5-daysplit-bodyspecificgrouptotal-bodyeverysessionprogressed377Similarly1RMrightLE2119782BP4293findingssuggestyoungprogressingequatedvolumeproducessimilarconstant8-weekperiodHigh-Low-FrequencyResistanceTrainingBodyMassGainsUntrainedMen

Similar Articles

Cited By