Alterations of Hematologic and Hematopoietic Parameters in Mice Exposed to Pulsed Electromagnetic Field.

Kangchu Li, Zenghui Teng, Zhaohui Liu, Yuxing Zhang, Kaiping Long, Qimei Liao, Ansheng Ni, Guirong Ding, Shirong Ma
Author Information
  1. Kangchu Li: Medical College, Xijing University, Xi'an, 710123 Shaanxi, China.
  2. Zenghui Teng: Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000 Sichuan, China. ORCID
  3. Zhaohui Liu: Department of Rehabilitative Physiotherapy of Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710038 Shaanxi, China.
  4. Yuxing Zhang: Medical College, Xijing University, Xi'an, 710123 Shaanxi, China.
  5. Kaiping Long: Medical College, Xijing University, Xi'an, 710123 Shaanxi, China.
  6. Qimei Liao: Medical College, Xijing University, Xi'an, 710123 Shaanxi, China.
  7. Ansheng Ni: Medical College, Xijing University, Xi'an, 710123 Shaanxi, China.
  8. Guirong Ding: Department of Radiation Biology, School of Preventive Medicine, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032 Shaanxi, China. ORCID
  9. Shirong Ma: Department of Pathology, School of Basic Medicine, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032 Shaanxi, China. ORCID

Abstract

Effects of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) on hematology and hematopoiesis might vary with different PEMF parameters. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the possible effects of PEMF exposure at different pulses on hematologic and hematopoietic parameters in mice. Groups of male BALB/c mice were whole body exposed or were sham exposed (control) to PEMF at 100, 1000, and 10000 pulses. After PEMF exposure, blood samples and bone marrow cells of mice were collected for hematologic examinations, bone marrow nucleated cell counting, colony-forming units of granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) colony assay, and serum granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) assay. Compared with the control group, white blood cells (WBC) and lymphocytes (LYM) in the 100 and 1000 pulses exposed groups were significantly increased but not changed in the 10000 pulses exposed group. Red blood cells (RBC), hemoglobin (HGB), and platelets (PLT) were not changed in all exposed groups. There was no significant difference in mouse bone marrow nucleated cell number between the control group and each exposed group 7 days after PEMF exposure. The CFU-GM clone number of bone marrow cells and serum GM-CSF level were significantly increased in the 100 and 1000 pulses exposed group but not changed in the 10000 pulses exposed group. Our results indicated that the PEMF exposure at fewer pulses may induce statistically significant alterations in some hematologic and hematopoietic parameters of mice but no changes can be found in the more pulses PEMF-exposed groups.

References

  1. Toxicol In Vitro. 2001 Aug-Oct;15(4-5):351-5 [PMID: 11566562]
  2. Med Tr Prom Ekol. 2001;(11):19-23 [PMID: 11768949]
  3. Arch Med Res. 2002 Jan-Feb;33(1):29-32 [PMID: 11825628]
  4. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2004 Dec;207(6):549-54 [PMID: 15729835]
  5. J Orthop Res. 2005 Nov;23(6):1308-14 [PMID: 15913941]
  6. Magy Onkol. 2005;49(2):149-51 [PMID: 16249811]
  7. Electromagn Biol Med. 2006;25(3):135-44 [PMID: 16954116]
  8. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2007 Jan-Mar;8(1):69-72 [PMID: 17477775]
  9. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2008 Nov;71(3):895-902 [PMID: 17996303]
  10. Biomed Environ Sci. 2009 Jun;22(3):265-8 [PMID: 19725471]
  11. Int J Radiat Biol. 1990 Oct;58(4):713-23 [PMID: 1976731]
  12. Int J Radiat Biol. 2011 Apr;87(4):416-23 [PMID: 21171939]
  13. Int J Cancer. 2012 Aug 15;131(4):769-78 [PMID: 22437882]
  14. Int J Radiat Biol. 2012 Nov;88(11):814-21 [PMID: 22788572]
  15. Br J Cancer. 2012 Oct 23;107(9):1652-9 [PMID: 22968649]
  16. Biomed Environ Sci. 2013 Feb;26(2):128-37 [PMID: 23336136]
  17. Br J Cancer. 2013 May 14;108(9):1899-906 [PMID: 23558899]
  18. Theriogenology. 2013 Jul 1;80(1):18-23 [PMID: 23623167]
  19. Electromagn Biol Med. 2013 Dec;32(4):551-9 [PMID: 23631695]
  20. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2013 Mar-Apr;22(2):245-52 [PMID: 23709381]
  21. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2013 Jul;17(13):1782-8 [PMID: 23852905]
  22. Anal Quant Cytopathol Histpathol. 2013 Oct;35(5):253-60 [PMID: 24282905]
  23. Environ Res. 1986 Feb;39(1):143-52 [PMID: 3943504]
  24. Radiat Res. 1985 Aug;103(2):186-95 [PMID: 4023174]
  25. Radiat Res. 1984 Nov;100(2):412-7 [PMID: 6494447]
  26. Bioelectromagnetics. 1983;4(4):383-96 [PMID: 6651890]
  27. Bioelectromagnetics. 1996;17(5):364-72 [PMID: 8915545]
  28. Growth Factors. 1996;13(3-4):205-17 [PMID: 8919028]
  29. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1997 Jan;35(1):55-63 [PMID: 9024673]
  30. Bioelectromagnetics. 1996;17(2):111-22 [PMID: 9139633]
  31. Life Sci. 1997;61(19):1935-46 [PMID: 9364198]
  32. Bioelectromagnetics. 1998;19(1):57-66 [PMID: 9453708]
  33. Life Sci. 1998;62(14):1271-80 [PMID: 9570342]
  34. Vopr Onkol. 1998;44(3):310-5 [PMID: 9695778]

MeSH Term

Animals
Bone Marrow
Bone Marrow Cells
Cells, Cultured
Electromagnetic Fields
Hematopoiesis
Hematopoietic Stem Cells
Male
Mice
Mice, Inbred BALB C

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0pulsesexposedPEMFgroupexposuremicebonemarrowcellsparametershematologiccontrol100100010000bloodgroupschangeddifferenthematopoieticnucleatedcellgranulocyte-macrophageCFU-GMassayserumGM-CSFsignificantlyincreasedsignificantnumberEffectspulsedelectromagneticfieldhematologyhematopoiesismightvarypurposestudyevaluatepossibleeffectsGroupsmaleBALB/cwholebodyshamsamplescollectedexaminationscountingcolony-formingunitscolonycolony-stimulatingfactorComparedwhiteWBClymphocytesLYMRedRBChemoglobinHGBplateletsPLTdifferencemouse7daysclonelevelresultsindicatedfewermayinducestatisticallyalterationschangescanfoundPEMF-exposedAlterationsHematologicHematopoieticParametersMiceExposedPulsedElectromagneticField

Similar Articles

Cited By