Open population maximum likelihood spatial capture-recapture.

Richard Glennie, David L Borchers, Matthew Murchie, Bart J Harmsen, Rebecca J Foster
Author Information
  1. Richard Glennie: Center for Research into Ecological and Environmental Modeling, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK. ORCID
  2. David L Borchers: Center for Research into Ecological and Environmental Modeling, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
  3. Matthew Murchie: Center for Research into Ecological and Environmental Modeling, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
  4. Bart J Harmsen: Environmental Research Institute, University of Belize, Belmopan, Belize.
  5. Rebecca J Foster: Environmental Research Institute, University of Belize, Belmopan, Belize.

Abstract

Open population capture-recapture models are widely used to estimate population demographics and abundance over time. Bayesian methods exist to incorporate open population modeling with spatial capture-recapture (SCR), allowing for estimation of the effective area sampled and population density. Here, open population SCR is formulated as a hidden Markov model (HMM), allowing inference by maximum likelihood for both Cormack-Jolly-Seber and Jolly-Seber models, with and without activity center movement. The method is applied to a 12-year survey of male jaguars (Panthera onca) in the Cockscomb Basin Wildlife Sanctuary, Belize, to estimate survival probability and population abundance over time. For this application, inference is shown to be biased when assuming activity centers are fixed over time, while including a model for activity center movement provides negligible bias and nominal confidence interval coverage, as demonstrated by a simulation study. The HMM approach is compared with Bayesian data augmentation and closed population models for this application. The method is substantially more computationally efficient than the Bayesian approach and provides a lower root-mean-square error in predicting population density compared to closed population models.

Keywords

References

  1. Borchers, D.L. and Efford, M. (2008). Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture-recapture studies. Biometrics, 64, 377-385.
  2. Calhoun, J.B., and Casby, J.U. (1958). Calculation of home range and density of small mammals. U.S. Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service. Number: 55.
  3. Chandler, R.B. and Clark, J.D. (2014). Spatially explicit integrated population models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 1351-1360.
  4. Cormack, R. (1964). Estimates of survival from the sighting of marked animals. Biometrika, 51, 429-438.
  5. Efford, M. (2004). Density estimation in live-trapping studies. Oikos, 106, 598-610.
  6. Efford, M. (2012). secr: Spatially Explicit Capture-Recapture Models package, version 3.2. The Comprehensive R Archive Network. https://cran.r-project.org/package=secr
  7. Fewster, R. and Jupp, P. (2009). Inference on population size in binomial detectability models. Biometrika, 96, 805-820.
  8. Gardner, B., Reppucci, J., Lucherini, M. and Royle, J.A. (2010). Spatially explicit inference for open populations: Estimating demographic parameters from camera-trap studies. Ecology, 91, 3376-3383.
  9. Harmsen, B.J., Foster, R.J., Sanchez, E., Gutierrez-González, C.E., Silver, S.C. and Ostro, L.E. et al. (2017). Long term monitoring of jaguars in the Cockscomb Basin wildlife sanctuary, Belize; implications for camera trap studies of carnivores. PLOS One, 12, e0179505.
  10. Harmsen, B.J., Foster, R.J., Silver, S.C., Ostro, L.E. and Doncaster, C.P. (2010). The ecology of jaguars in the Cockscomb Basin wildlife sanctuary, Belize. The Biology and Conservation of Wild Felids. D. MacDonald, and A. Loveridge (eds), 403-416, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  11. Jolly, G.M. (1965). Explicit estimates from capture-recapture data with both death and immigration-stochastic model. Biometrika, 52, 225-247.
  12. King, R., McClintock, B.T., Kidney, D. and Borchers, D.L. (2016). Capture-recapture abundance estimation using a semi-complete data likelihood approach. Annals of Applied Statistics, 10, 264-285.
  13. Otis, D.L., Burnham, K.P., White, G.C. and Anderson, D.R. (1978). Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations. Wildlife Monographs, 62, 3-135.
  14. Plummer, M. (2013). rjags: Bayesian Graphics Models Using MCMC package, version 3. The Comprehensive R Archive Network. https://cran.r-project.org/package=rjags.
  15. Pollock, K.H. (1982). A capture-recapture design robust to unequal probability of capture. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 46, 752-757.
  16. Royle, J.A., Chandler, R.B., Sollmann, R. and Gardner, B. (2013). Spatial Capture-Recapture. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Academic Press.
  17. Royle, J.A., Fuller, A.K. and Sutherland, C. (2016). Spatial capture-recapture models allowing markovian transience or dispersal. Population Ecology, 58, 53-62.
  18. Schwarz, C. and Arnason, A. (1996). A general methodology for the analysis of capture-recapture experiments in open populations. Biometrics, 52, 860-873.
  19. Seber, G.A. (1965). A note on the multiple-recapture census. Biometrika, 52, 249-259.
  20. Zucchini, W., MacDonald, I.L. and Langrock, R. (2016). Hidden Markov Models for Time Series: An Introduction Using R. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.

MeSH Term

Animals
Animals, Wild
Bayes Theorem
Belize
Biometry
Male
Markov Chains
Models, Biological
Panthera
Population Density
Population Dynamics
Probability
Survival Rate

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0populationcapture-recapturemodelstimeBayesianopenspatialdensitymodelactivityOpenestimateabundanceSCRallowinghiddenMarkovHMMinferencemaximumlikelihoodcentermovementmethodPantheraoncasurvivalapplicationprovidesapproachcomparedclosedwidelyuseddemographicsmethodsexistincorporatemodelingestimationeffectiveareasampledformulatedCormack-Jolly-SeberJolly-Seberwithoutapplied12-yearsurveymalejaguarsCockscombBasinWildlifeSanctuaryBelizeprobabilityshownbiasedassumingcentersfixedincludingnegligiblebiasnominalconfidenceintervalcoveragedemonstratedsimulationstudydataaugmentationsubstantiallycomputationallyefficientlowerroot-mean-squareerrorpredicting

Similar Articles

Cited By