Medical students' perceptions towards learning communication skills: a qualitative study following the 2-year training programme.

Roger Ruiz-Moral, Cristina Gracia de Leonardo, Fernando Caballero Martínez, Diana Monge Martín
Author Information
  1. Roger Ruiz-Moral: Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Francisco de Vitoria University, Spain.
  2. Cristina Gracia de Leonardo: Department of Basic Sciences, School of Medicine, Francisco de Vitoria University, Spain.
  3. Fernando Caballero Martínez: Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Francisco de Vitoria University, Spain.
  4. Diana Monge Martín: Department of Statistic and Research, School of Medicine, Francisco de Vitoria University, Spain.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to gain an understanding of the perceptions of 4th-year medical students about a training course in communication skills with 'experiential learning' characteristics, completed over the past two years.
METHODS: Twenty 4th-year medical students were invited to participate in a qualitative study with focus groups. These students were selected randomly, stratifying by gender, from all 4th-year medical students (106) at the Francisco de Vitoria University (Madrid). The students had just completed their communication skills training taught in small groups, with simulated patient interviews and feedback. The focus-group facilitator used an open-ended discussion guide to explore the students' perceptions. Thematic analysis was used to identify salient themes from these discussions.
RESULTS: Sixteen students participated in two focus groups. The discussions revealed two contrasting perceptions: while this learning is considered useful, it nevertheless brings about a great deal of stress, especially regarding student exposure to peers in small-group sessions when interviewing standardised patients, and summative assessment. This generates a range of negative feelings in students that could affect perspective and attitude towards the importance of doctor-patient relationships.
CONCLUSIONS: Experiential learning is effective in improving students' communication skills. However, these results suggest that use of such strategies requires a strong focus on "student-centred" teaching approaches, in order to minimise some sensitive topics that may arise during the learning. Further research is needed to refine these strategies depending on the teaching situation and to identify different ways of implementing these experiential methods.

Keywords

References

  1. JAMA. 1999 Sep 1;282(9):833-9 [PMID: 10478689]
  2. Acad Med. 2000 Oct;75(10 Suppl):S90-2 [PMID: 11031185]
  3. J Fam Pract. 2000 Sep;49(9):796-804 [PMID: 11032203]
  4. Med Educ. 2001 Mar;35(3):225-31 [PMID: 11260445]
  5. Lancet. 2001 Mar 24;357(9260):945-9 [PMID: 11289364]
  6. Med Educ. 2001 Jun;35(6):548-54 [PMID: 11380857]
  7. Eur J Neurol. 2002 Jan;9(1):83-7 [PMID: 11784381]
  8. Fam Med. 2002 May;34(5):319-24 [PMID: 12038712]
  9. Med Teach. 2002 May;24(3):289-93 [PMID: 12098416]
  10. JAMA. 2002 Aug 14;288(6):756-64 [PMID: 12169083]
  11. Patient Educ Couns. 2002 Sep;48(1):51-61 [PMID: 12220750]
  12. Med Educ. 2002 Nov;36(11):1017-27 [PMID: 12406261]
  13. BMJ. 2003 Mar 15;326(7389):591-4 [PMID: 12637408]
  14. Soc Sci Med. 2003 Sep;57(5):791-806 [PMID: 12850107]
  15. JAMA. 2003 Sep 3;290(9):1157-65 [PMID: 12952997]
  16. J Gen Intern Med. 1992 Sep-Oct;7(5):499-505 [PMID: 1403205]
  17. Acad Med. 2004 Mar;79(3):276-80 [PMID: 14985204]
  18. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Jun 1;140(11):874-81 [PMID: 15172901]
  19. Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Jul;54(1):119-21 [PMID: 15210269]
  20. Acad Med. 2004 Oct;79(10 Suppl):S70-81 [PMID: 15383395]
  21. Med Educ. 2004 Oct;38(10):1044-52 [PMID: 15461649]
  22. Curr Opin Oncol. 2005 Jul;17(4):351-4 [PMID: 15933466]
  23. Med Educ. 2005 Jul;39(7):742-50 [PMID: 15960795]
  24. BMC Med Educ. 2005 Jul 19;5:28 [PMID: 16029509]
  25. Med Educ. 2006 Apr;40(4):322-8 [PMID: 16573667]
  26. Curr Surg. 2006 Nov-Dec;63(6):401-9 [PMID: 17084769]
  27. Eval Health Prof. 2007 Mar;30(1):3-21 [PMID: 17293605]
  28. J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Jan;22(1):86-91 [PMID: 17351845]
  29. BMC Med Educ. 2007 Mar 30;7:4 [PMID: 17394673]
  30. Med Care. 2007 Apr;45(4):340-9 [PMID: 17496718]
  31. Acad Med. 2008 Mar;83(3):257-64 [PMID: 18316871]
  32. Med Teach. 2008;30(3):272-9 [PMID: 18484454]
  33. Med Educ. 2008 Nov;42(11):1100-7 [PMID: 18761615]
  34. Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Nov;15(11):1010-6 [PMID: 18945231]
  35. Med Teach. 2009 Jul;31(7):e316-22 [PMID: 19811140]
  36. Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Aug;84(2):152-62 [PMID: 20673620]
  37. Med Teach. 1999;21(6):563-70 [PMID: 21281175]
  38. Med Educ. 2011 Mar;45(3):217-26 [PMID: 21299597]
  39. Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Sep;84(3):310-8 [PMID: 21482064]
  40. Med Teach. 2012;34(2):e102-15 [PMID: 22289008]
  41. Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Feb;90(2):193-9 [PMID: 22632737]
  42. Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Oct;93(1):18-26 [PMID: 23199592]
  43. Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Feb;90(2):177-83 [PMID: 23273436]
  44. Med Teach. 2013 May;35(5):395-403 [PMID: 23444891]
  45. Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Apr;95(1):91-7 [PMID: 24468200]
  46. BMC Med Educ. 2016 Mar 28;16:99 [PMID: 27017939]
  47. Med Educ. 1989 Jul;23(4):364-70 [PMID: 2770578]
  48. Med Educ Online. 2006 Dec;11(1):4594 [PMID: 28253797]
  49. Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Sep;100(9):1694-1700 [PMID: 28487117]
  50. J Med Educ. 1986 Jul;61(7):603-5 [PMID: 3723575]
  51. BMJ. 1995 Jul 29;311(7000):299-302 [PMID: 7633241]
  52. JAMA. 1997 Feb 19;277(7):553-9 [PMID: 9032162]
  53. J Gen Intern Med. 1998 Feb;13(2):111-6 [PMID: 9502371]
  54. Med Educ. 1998 May;32(3):332-6 [PMID: 9743791]

MeSH Term

Clinical Competence
Communication
Education, Medical
Feedback
Female
Focus Groups
Humans
Male
Peer Group
Physician-Patient Relations
Problem-Based Learning
Qualitative Research
Spain
Students, Medical
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0studentscommunicationlearningstudymedicalskillsfocusgroupsperceptions4th-yeartrainingtwoqualitativestudents'completedusedidentifydiscussionstowardsstrategiesteachingexperientialOBJECTIVES:aimedgainunderstandingcourse'experientiallearning'characteristicspastyearsMETHODS:Twentyinvitedparticipateselectedrandomlystratifyinggender106FranciscodeVitoriaUniversityMadridjusttaughtsmallsimulatedpatientinterviewsfeedbackfocus-groupfacilitatoropen-endeddiscussionguideexploreThematicanalysissalientthemesRESULTS:Sixteenparticipatedrevealedcontrastingperceptions:consideredusefulneverthelessbringsgreatdealstressespeciallyregardingstudentexposurepeerssmall-groupsessionsinterviewingstandardisedpatientssummativeassessmentgeneratesrangenegativefeelingsaffectperspectiveattitudeimportancedoctor-patientrelationshipsCONCLUSIONS:ExperientialeffectiveimprovingHoweverresultssuggestuserequiresstrong"student-centred"approachesorderminimisesensitivetopicsmayariseresearchneededrefinedependingsituationdifferentwaysimplementingmethodsMedicalskills:following2-yearprogramme

Similar Articles

Cited By