Exact sampling hardness of Ising spin models.

B Fefferman, M Foss-Feig, A V Gorshkov
Author Information
  1. B Fefferman: Joint Center for Quantum Information and Computer Science, NIST and University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA.
  2. M Foss-Feig: Joint Center for Quantum Information and Computer Science, NIST and University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA.
  3. A V Gorshkov: Joint Center for Quantum Information and Computer Science, NIST and University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA.

Abstract

We study the complexity of classically sampling from the output distribution of an Ising spin model, which can be implemented naturally in a variety of atomic, molecular, and optical systems. In particular, we construct a specific example of an Ising Hamiltonian that, after time evolution starting from a trivial initial state, produces a particular output configuration with probability very nearly proportional to the square of the permanent of a matrix with arbitrary integer entries. In a similar spirit to boson sampling, the ability to sample classically from the probability distribution induced by time evolution under this Hamiltonian would imply unlikely complexity theoretic consequences, suggesting that the dynamics of such a spin model cannot be efficiently simulated with a classical computer. Physical Ising spin systems capable of achieving problem-size instances (i.e., qubit numbers) large enough so that classical sampling of the output distribution is classically difficult in practice may be achievable in the near future. Unlike boson sampling, our current results only imply hardness of classical sampling, leaving open the important question of whether a much stronger approximate-sampling hardness result holds in this context. The latter is most likely necessary to enable a convincing experimental demonstration of quantum supremacy. As referenced in a recent paper [A. Bouland, L. Mancinska, and X. Zhang, in International Proceedings in Informatics (Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fur Informatik, Dagstuhl, 2016)], our result completes the sampling hardness classification of two-qubit commuting Hamiltonians.

References

  1. Science. 2013 Feb 15;339(6121):794-8 [PMID: 23258411]
  2. Nature. 2014 Jul 10;511(7508):198-201 [PMID: 25008525]
  3. Science. 2013 Feb 15;339(6121):798-801 [PMID: 23258407]
  4. Science. 2016 Jun 10;352(6291):1297-301 [PMID: 27284189]
  5. Nature. 2016 Aug 03;536(7614):63-6 [PMID: 27488798]
  6. Phys Rev Lett. 2013 Sep 27;111(13):130503 [PMID: 24116759]
  7. Phys Rev Lett. 2017 Jan 27;118(4):040502 [PMID: 28186821]

Grants

  1. 9999-NIST/Intramural NIST DOC

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0samplingIsingspinhardnessclassicallyoutputdistributionclassicalcomplexitymodelsystemsparticularHamiltoniantimeevolutionprobabilitybosonimplyresultstudycanimplementednaturallyvarietyatomicmolecularopticalconstructspecificexamplestartingtrivialinitialstateproducesconfigurationnearlyproportionalsquarepermanentmatrixarbitraryintegerentriessimilarspiritabilitysampleinducedunlikelytheoreticconsequencessuggestingdynamicsefficientlysimulatedcomputerPhysicalcapableachievingproblem-sizeinstancesiequbitnumberslargeenoughdifficultpracticemayachievablenearfutureUnlikecurrentresultsleavingopenimportantquestionwhethermuchstrongerapproximate-samplingholdscontextlatterlikelynecessaryenableconvincingexperimentaldemonstrationquantumsupremacyreferencedrecentpaper[ABoulandLMancinskaXZhangInternationalProceedingsInformaticsSchlossDagstuhl-Leibniz-ZentrumfurInformatikDagstuhl2016]completesclassificationtwo-qubitcommutingHamiltoniansExactmodels

Similar Articles

Cited By