High Fidelity Microsurgical Simulation: The Thiel Model and Evaluation Instrument.

Andrei Odobescu, Isak Goodwin, Djamal Berbiche, Joseph BouMerhi, Patrick G Harris, Michel A Danino
Author Information
  1. Andrei Odobescu: Division of plastic surgery, University of Montreal Hospital Center, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
  2. Isak Goodwin: Division of plastic surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  3. Djamal Berbiche: University of Sherbrooke, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
  4. Joseph BouMerhi: Division of plastic surgery, University of Montreal Hospital Center, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
  5. Patrick G Harris: Division of plastic surgery, University of Montreal Hospital Center, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
  6. Michel A Danino: Division of plastic surgery, University of Montreal Hospital Center, Montreal, Québec, Canada.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Thiel embalmment method has recently been used in a number of medical simulation fields. The authors investigate the use of Thiel vessels as a high fidelity model for microvascular simulation and propose a new checklist-based evaluation instrument for microsurgical training.
METHODS: Thirteen residents and 2 attending microsurgeons performed video recorded microvascular anastomoses on Thiel embalmed arteries that were evaluated using a new evaluation instrument (Microvascular Evaluation Scale) by 4 fellowship trained microsurgeons. The internal validity was assessed using the Cronbach coefficient. The external validity was verified using regression models.
RESULTS: The reliability assessment revealed an excellent intra-class correlation of 0.89. When comparing scores obtained by participants from different levels of training, attending surgeons and senior residents (Post Graduate Year [PGY] 4-5) scored significantly better than junior residents (PGY 1-3). The difference between senior residents and attending surgeons was not significant. When considering microsurgical experience, the differences were significant between the advanced group and the minimal and moderate experience groups. The differences between minimal and moderate experience groups were not significant. Based on the data obtained, a score of 8 would translate into a level of microsurgical competence appropriate for clinical microsurgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Thiel cadaveric vessels are a high fidelity model for microsurgical simulation. Excellent internal and external validity measures were obtained using the Microvascular Evaluation Scale (MVES).

Keywords

References

  1. Microsurgery. 2001;21(8):389-93 [PMID: 11757067]
  2. Microsurgery. 2004;24(4):335-8 [PMID: 15274194]
  3. Microsurgery. 2008;28(4):273-8 [PMID: 18383351]
  4. J Craniofac Surg. 2009 Jan;20(1):238-9 [PMID: 19165035]
  5. Surg Neurol. 2009 Dec;72(6):695-9 [PMID: 19329164]
  6. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010 Aug;63(8):1329-34 [PMID: 19625227]
  7. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010 Jun;63(6):1063 [PMID: 19939756]
  8. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Jan;127(1):215-22 [PMID: 21200214]
  9. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011 Aug;64(8):e210-2 [PMID: 21277267]
  10. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014 Mar;67(3):389-95 [PMID: 24507964]
  11. Plast Surg (Oakv). 2015 Summer;23(2):100-2 [PMID: 26090351]
  12. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017 Jul;70(7):893-900 [PMID: 28526634]
  13. Br J Surg. 1997 Feb;84(2):273-8 [PMID: 9052454]
  14. Am J Surg. 1997 Mar;173(3):226-30 [PMID: 9124632]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0ThielsimulationmicrosurgicalresidentsusingmicrovascularattendingEvaluationvalidityobtainedsignificantexperiencevesselshighfidelitymodelnewevaluationinstrumenttrainingmicrosurgeonsMicrovascularScaleinternalexternalsurgeonsseniordifferencesminimalmoderategroupsmicrosurgeryBACKGROUND:embalmmentmethodrecentlyusednumbermedicalfieldsauthorsinvestigateuseproposechecklist-basedMETHODS:Thirteen2performedvideorecordedanastomosesembalmedarteriesevaluated4fellowshiptrainedassessedCronbachcoefficientverifiedregressionmodelsRESULTS:reliabilityassessmentrevealedexcellentintra-classcorrelation089comparingscoresparticipantsdifferentlevelsPostGraduateYear[PGY]4-5scoredsignificantlybetterjuniorPGY1-3differenceconsideringadvancedgroupBaseddatascore8translatelevelcompetenceappropriateclinicalCONCLUSIONS:cadavericExcellentmeasuresMVESHighFidelityMicrosurgicalSimulation:ModelInstrument

Similar Articles

Cited By (3)