E-cigarette minimum legal sale age laws and traditional cigarette use among rural pregnant teenagers.

Michael F Pesko, Janet M Currie
Author Information
  1. Michael F Pesko: Department of Economics, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, United States.
  2. Janet M Currie: Henry Putnam Professor of Economics and Public Affairs, Director of the Center for Health and Well-Being, Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, United States. Electronic address: jcurrie@princeton.edu.

Abstract

Teenagers under 18 could legally purchase e-cigarettes until states passed minimum legal sale age laws. These laws may have curtailed teenagers' use of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation. We investigate the effect of e-cigarette minimum legal sale age laws on prenatal cigarette smoking and birth outcomes for underage rural teenagers using data on all births from 2010 to 2016 from 32 states. We find that the laws increased prenatal smoking by 0.6 percentage points (pp) overall. These effects were concentrated in prepregnancy smokers, with no effect on prepregnancy non-smokers. These results suggest that the laws reduced cigarette smoking cessation during pregnancy rather than causing new cigarette smoking initiation. Our results may indicate an unmet need for assistance with smoking cessation among pregnant teenagers.

Keywords

References

  1. NCHS Data Brief. 2016 Nov;(264):1-8 [PMID: 27849147]
  2. Prev Med. 2018 Dec;117:61-68 [PMID: 29559222]
  3. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Jun 08;67(22):629-633 [PMID: 29879097]
  4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Sep 14;9:CD010216 [PMID: 27622384]
  5. J Health Econ. 2017 Dec;56:178-190 [PMID: 29107198]
  6. Matern Child Health J. 2015 Sep;19(9):1916-24 [PMID: 25676044]
  7. Health Econ. 2019 Mar;28(3):419-436 [PMID: 30648308]
  8. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Nov 16;67(45):1276-1277 [PMID: 30439875]
  9. J Health Econ. 2017 Jul;54:17-24 [PMID: 28349865]
  10. J Health Econ. 2003 Nov;22(6):1053-72 [PMID: 14604560]
  11. Prev Med. 2015 Sep;78:92-100 [PMID: 26190366]
  12. Prev Med. 2017 Nov;104:50-56 [PMID: 28789981]
  13. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Oct 20;163(8):622-34 [PMID: 26389730]
  14. N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 1;366(9):808-18 [PMID: 22375972]
  15. Nicotine Tob Res. 2017 May 1;19(5):585-590 [PMID: 28403454]
  16. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015 Apr 17;64(14):381-5 [PMID: 25879896]
  17. J Health Econ. 2018 Sep;61:205-219 [PMID: 30172023]
  18. J Health Econ. 2015 Dec;44:300-8 [PMID: 26583343]
  19. Prev Med. 2016 Jun;87:207-212 [PMID: 26971853]
  20. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2016 Feb 10;65(1):1-14 [PMID: 26905977]

Grants

  1. P30 DA040500/NIDA NIH HHS
  2. R01 DA039968/NIDA NIH HHS
  3. R01 DA045016/NIDA NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems
Female
Humans
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Trimesters
Pregnancy in Adolescence
Rural Population
Smoking
United States

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0lawssmokingagecigaretteminimumlegalsalecessationteenagerse-cigarettesstatesmayuseeffectprenataloutcomesruralprepregnancyresultsamongpregnantTeenagers18legallypurchasepassedcurtailedteenagers'investigatee-cigarettebirthunderageusingdatabirths2010201632findincreased06percentagepointsppoveralleffectsconcentratedsmokersnon-smokerssuggestreducedpregnancyrathercausingnewinitiationindicateunmetneedassistanceE-cigarettetraditionalBirthE-cigarettesElectronicnicotinedeliverysystemsPrenatalPurchasingTobaccocontrol

Similar Articles

Cited By