Heart Rate Variability and Stress Recovery Responses during a Training Camp in Elite Young Canoe Sprint Athletes.

André B Coelho, Fábio Y Nakamura, Micaela C Morgado, Clifton J Holmes, Angela Baldassarre, Michael R Esco, Luis M Rama
Author Information
  1. André B Coelho: Research Center for Sport and Physical Activity (CIDAF), Faculty of Sports Science and Physical Education, University of Coimbra, Coimbra 3040-256, Portugal. andrebastoscoelho@hotmail.com.
  2. Fábio Y Nakamura: Department of Medicine and Aging Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio", University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti - Via dei Vestini 31, Italy. fabioy_nakamura@yahoo.com.br. ORCID
  3. Micaela C Morgado: Faculty of Sports, University of Porto, Porto 4200-450, Portugal. micaelacmorgado@hotmail.com.
  4. Clifton J Holmes: Department of Kinesiology, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA. cjholmes2@crimson.ua.edu.
  5. Angela Baldassarre: Department of Medicine and Aging Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio", University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti - Via dei Vestini 31, Italy. a.dibaldassarre@unich.it. ORCID
  6. Michael R Esco: Department of Kinesiology, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA. mresco@ua.edu.
  7. Luis M Rama: Research Center for Sport and Physical Activity (CIDAF), Faculty of Sports Science and Physical Education, University of Coimbra, Coimbra 3040-256, Portugal. luisrama@fcdef.uc.pt. ORCID

Abstract

Training camps are typical in elite Canoeing preparation, during which, the care to assure adaptation to avoid undesired fatigue is not always present. This study aimed identifying a specific sex response in perceived training loads, recovery and stress balance, and cardiac autonomic responses. Twenty-one elite athletes (11 males and 10 females) of the Portuguese Canoeing National team participated in the investigation. The daily HRV (lnRMSSD) was monitored. The (RESTQ-52) questionnaire was used to access the recovery and stress state. The 10-day training camp was composed of two consecutive 5-day periods (P1 and P2). Data analyses were performed using confidence limits, effect size, and magnitude-based inference. In the females, Session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE), lnRMSSD, and its coefficient of variation did not change between P1 and P2. However, in males, lnRMSSD showed a small reduction from P1 to P2. Also, sRPE was higher in males over the training period, with a possibly small difference at P2. Regarding RESTQ-52, total stress most likely increased with large and very large differences in males and moderate differences in females during the training period. Male canoeists undertook higher perceived training loads than females, with a consequent higher level of total perceived stress and lnRMSSD during a 10-day training camp.

Keywords

References

  1. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2000 Dec;40(4):327-35 [PMID: 11297003]
  2. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2006 Feb;16(1):57-69 [PMID: 16430682]
  3. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007 Feb;99(3):313-24 [PMID: 17219174]
  4. J Sci Med Sport. 2007 Dec;10(6):372-81 [PMID: 17466593]
  5. Percept Mot Skills. 2008 Jun;106(3):904-16 [PMID: 18712214]
  6. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Jan;41(1):3-13 [PMID: 19092709]
  7. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2006 Mar;1(1):50-7 [PMID: 19114737]
  8. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010 Oct;20 Suppl 2:95-102 [PMID: 20840567]
  9. Int J Sports Med. 2011 Apr;32(4):259-65 [PMID: 21271495]
  10. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2012 Oct;52(5):501-5 [PMID: 22976736]
  11. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2013 Jul;8(4):400-9 [PMID: 23170746]
  12. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2013 Nov;8(6):618-22 [PMID: 23479432]
  13. Sports Med. 2013 Sep;43(9):773-81 [PMID: 23852425]
  14. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013 Nov;45(11):2061-71 [PMID: 24136138]
  15. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014 May;9(3):425-31 [PMID: 24155062]
  16. J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Jul;28(7):1896-905 [PMID: 24276307]
  17. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014 Sep;9(5):783-90 [PMID: 24334285]
  18. J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Feb;28(2):474-82 [PMID: 24476743]
  19. Front Physiol. 2014 Feb 27;5:73 [PMID: 24578692]
  20. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014 Sep;46(9):1769-77 [PMID: 25134000]
  21. J Sports Sci Med. 2014 Sep 01;13(3):535-41 [PMID: 25177179]
  22. J Sports Sci Med. 2014 Sep 01;13(3):571-9 [PMID: 25177184]
  23. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2015 Nov;10(8):994-1000 [PMID: 25756657]
  24. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2016 Mar;11(2):154-8 [PMID: 26115088]
  25. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2017 Jun;57(6):907-915 [PMID: 26997322]
  26. J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Feb;31(2):531-538 [PMID: 27227794]
  27. J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Feb;31(2):548-551 [PMID: 27243917]
  28. J Sci Med Sport. 2017 Jun;20(6):606-610 [PMID: 27890479]
  29. J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Jun;31(6):1477-1485 [PMID: 28538295]
  30. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018 Oct;50(10):2166-2176 [PMID: 29683920]
  31. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019 Mar;51(3):601 [PMID: 30365420]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0trainingperceivedstressmalesfemaleslnRMSSDP2P1higherTrainingeliteCanoeingloadsrecoverycardiacautonomicRESTQ-5210-daycampsRPEsmallperiodtotallargedifferencescanoeistscampstypicalpreparationcareassureadaptationavoidundesiredfatiguealwayspresentstudyaimedidentifyingspecificsexresponsebalanceresponsesTwenty-oneathletes1110PortugueseNationalteamparticipatedinvestigationdailyHRVmonitoredquestionnaireusedaccessstatecomposedtwoconsecutive5-dayperiodsDataanalysesperformedusingconfidencelimitseffectsizemagnitude-basedinferenceSessionratingexertioncoefficientvariationchangeHowevershowedreductionAlsopossiblydifferenceRegardinglikelyincreasedmoderateMaleundertookconsequentlevelHeartRateVariabilityStressRecoveryResponsesCampEliteYoungCanoeSprintAthletesfunctionpsychometricsimpulse

Similar Articles

Cited By (3)