Effect of music interventions on anxiety during labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Hsin-Hui Lin, Yu-Chen Chang, Hsiao-Hui Chou, Chih-Po Chang, Ming-Yuan Huang, Shu-Jung Liu, Chin-Han Tsai, Wei-Te Lei, Tzu-Lin Yeh
Author Information
  1. Hsin-Hui Lin: Department of Family Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. ORCID
  2. Yu-Chen Chang: Department of Family Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
  3. Hsiao-Hui Chou: Department of Family Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
  4. Chih-Po Chang: Department of Family Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
  5. Ming-Yuan Huang: Department of Hospice and Palliative Care, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Tamsui Branch, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
  6. Shu-Jung Liu: Department of Medical Library, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Tamsui Branch, New Taipei City, Taiwan. ORCID
  7. Chin-Han Tsai: Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hsinchu MacKay Memorial Hospital, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
  8. Wei-Te Lei: Department of Pediatrics, Hsinchu MacKay Memorial Hospital, Hsinchu, Taiwan. ORCID
  9. Tzu-Lin Yeh: Department of Family Medicine, Hsinchu MacKay Memorial Hospital, Hsinchu, Taiwan. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anxiety is commonly experienced during the delivery process and has shown to have adverse effects on maternal and infant health outcomes. Music interventions tend to reduce the effects of Anxiety in diverse populations, are low cost, are easily accessible, and have high acceptability. The aim of this review and meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of music interventions in reducing Anxiety levels among women during labor.
METHODS: Seven databases from inception to the end of December, 2018, without any language or time restriction including Embase, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, PsycINFO, Airiti Library, and PerioPath: Index to Taiwan Periodical Literature were searched using key terms related to pregnancy, Anxiety, and music. Randomized controlled trials that assessed the effect of music during labor and measured Anxiety levels as an outcome were included. Meta-analyses were conducted to assess Anxiety reduction following a music intervention compared to that after placebo treatment.
RESULTS: A total of 14 studies that investigated a total of 1,310 participants were included in this review. The meta-analyses indicated that those in the intervention group had a significant decrease in Anxiety scores (standardized mean difference = -2.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) [-3.29 to -1.52], < 0.001; = 97.66%), heart rate (HR) (difference in means = -3.04 beats/min, 95% CI [-4.79 to -1.29] beats/min, = 0.001; = 0.00%), systolic blood pressure (SBP) (difference in means = -3.71 mmHg, 95% CI [-7.07 to -0.35] mmHg, = 0.031; = 58.47%), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (difference in means = -3.54 mmHg, 95% CI [-5.27 to -1.81] mmHg, < 0.001; = 0.00%) as compared to the women in the control group.
CONCLUSIONS: Music interventions may decrease Anxiety scores and physiological indexes related to Anxiety (HR, SBP, and DBP). Music interventions may be a good non-pharmacological approach for decreasing Anxiety levels during labor.

Keywords

References

  1. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1976 Dec;10(4):339-41 [PMID: 1071419]
  2. Birth. 2000 Dec;27(4):272-6 [PMID: 11251514]
  3. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001 Aug;45(7):812-7 [PMID: 11472279]
  4. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Dec;44(4):704-32 [PMID: 11600853]
  5. Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1539-58 [PMID: 12111919]
  6. Appl Nurs Res. 2002 Aug;15(3):126-36 [PMID: 12173164]
  7. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2003 Jan;47(1):26-9 [PMID: 12492793]
  8. AORN J. 2003 Feb;77(2):396-7, 401-6, 409-10 [PMID: 12619853]
  9. Pain Manag Nurs. 2003 Jun;4(2):54-61 [PMID: 12836149]
  10. BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60 [PMID: 12958120]
  11. Nurs Crit Care. 2004 Mar-Apr;9(2):72-9 [PMID: 15068057]
  12. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2004 Jul-Aug;33(4):410-20 [PMID: 15346666]
  13. AORN J. 2004 Aug;80(2):269-74, 277-8 [PMID: 15382598]
  14. Res Nurs Health. 2005 Dec;28(6):453-61 [PMID: 16287051]
  15. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1992 Jul;19(6):863-7 [PMID: 1635867]
  16. J Adv Nurs. 2006 Jun;54(5):553-62 [PMID: 16722953]
  17. Australas Radiol. 2007 Apr;51(2):159-62 [PMID: 17419862]
  18. Br J Surg. 2007 Aug;94(8):943-7 [PMID: 17636513]
  19. Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2007 Oct;19(3):573-86 [PMID: 18044285]
  20. Anesth Analg. 1991 Aug;73(2):190-8 [PMID: 1854034]
  21. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;(2):CD006914 [PMID: 19370660]
  22. BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2700 [PMID: 19622552]
  23. J Clin Nurs. 2010 Apr;19(7-8):1065-72 [PMID: 20492051]
  24. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012 Oct;119(1):81-3 [PMID: 22795881]
  25. Birth. 2012 Jun;39(2):121-7 [PMID: 23281860]
  26. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2013 Feb;68(2):119-29 [PMID: 23417218]
  27. J Affect Disord. 2014 Mar;156:194-9 [PMID: 24411681]
  28. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2014 Jun;17(3):221-8 [PMID: 24442712]
  29. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2014;78(4):244-50 [PMID: 25227477]
  30. Support Care Cancer. 2015 May;23(5):1261-71 [PMID: 25322972]
  31. Eur Heart J. 2015 Nov 21;36(44):3043-9 [PMID: 26354957]
  32. Minerva Anestesiol. 2016 Sep;82(9):974-80 [PMID: 27028449]
  33. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 May 18;16:113 [PMID: 27188222]
  34. Stress. 2017 Sep;20(5):495-504 [PMID: 28691638]
  35. BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Jul 27;17(1):271 [PMID: 28750631]
  36. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2018 Feb;30:96-102 [PMID: 29389487]
  37. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 28;3:CD009290 [PMID: 29589380]
  38. J Adv Nurs. 2019 Apr;75(4):723-733 [PMID: 30289556]
  39. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Nov 3;18(1):435 [PMID: 30390639]
  40. Biomed Pharmacother. 1994;48(7):275-81 [PMID: 7858157]
  41. BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):629-34 [PMID: 9310563]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0anxiety=0interventionsmusicMusicdifference95%CImmHgreviewlevelslabor-1001means-3Anxietyeffectsmeta-analysisassesswomenLibraryIndexrelatedcontrolledtrialsincludedinterventioncomparedtotalgroupdecreasescores<HRbeats/min00%bloodpressureSBPDBPmayBACKGROUND:commonlyexperienceddeliveryprocessshownadversematernalinfanthealthoutcomestendreducediversepopulationslowcosteasilyaccessiblehighacceptabilityaimeffectivenessreducingamongMETHODS:SevendatabasesinceptionendDecember2018withoutlanguagetimerestrictionincludingEmbasePubMedCochraneCumulativeNursingAlliedHealthPsycINFOAiritiPerioPath:TaiwanPeriodicalLiteraturesearchedusingkeytermspregnancyRandomizedassessedeffectmeasuredoutcomeMeta-analysesconductedreductionfollowingplacebotreatmentRESULTS:14studiesinvestigated1310participantsmeta-analysesindicatedsignificantstandardizedmean-240confidenceinterval[-32952]9766%heartrate04[-47929]systolic71[-707-035]0315847%diastolic54[-52781]controlCONCLUSIONS:physiologicalindexesgoodnon-pharmacologicalapproachdecreasingEffectlabor:systematicrandomizedLaborPregnancyStress

Similar Articles

Cited By