Inoculum effect of β-lactam antibiotics.

Justin R Lenhard, Zackery P Bulman
Author Information
  1. Justin R Lenhard: California Northstate University College of Pharmacy, Elk Grove, CA, USA.
  2. Zackery P Bulman: College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Abstract

The phenomenon of attenuated antibacterial activity at inocula above those utilized for susceptibility testing is referred to as the inoculum effect. Although the inoculum effect has been reported for several decades, it is currently debatable whether the inoculum effect is clinically significant. The aim of the present review was to consolidate currently available evidence to summarize which β-lactam drug classes demonstrate an inoculum effect against specific bacterial pathogens. Review of the literature showed that the majority of studies that evaluated the inoculum effect of β-lactams were in vitro investigations of Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Staphylococcus aureus. Across all five pathogens, cephalosporins consistently displayed observable inoculum effects in vitro, whereas carbapenems were less susceptible to an inoculum effect. A handful of animal studies were available that validated that the in vitro inoculum effect translates into attenuated pharmacodynamics of β-lactams in vivo. Only a few clinical investigations were available and suggested that an in vitro inoculum effect of cefazolin against MSSA may correspond to an increased likeliness of adverse clinical outcomes in patients receiving cefazolin for bacteraemia. The presence of β-lactamase enzymes was the primary mechanism responsible for an inoculum effect, but the observation of an inoculum effect in multiple pathogens lacking β-lactamase enzymes indicates that there are likely multiple mechanisms that may result in an inoculum effect. Further clinical studies are needed to better define whether interventions made in the clinic in response to organisms displaying an in vitro inoculum effect will optimize clinical outcomes.

References

  1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999 May;43(5):1170-6 [PMID: 10223931]
  2. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999 Jul;43(7):1669-73 [PMID: 10390220]
  3. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1999 Jul;44(1):91-7 [PMID: 10459815]
  4. Infection. 1979;7(2):67-73 [PMID: 108220]
  5. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2000 Sep;6(9):509-15 [PMID: 11168187]
  6. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001 Apr;45(4):1287-91 [PMID: 11257049]
  7. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2001 Mar 1;196(1):25-9 [PMID: 11257543]
  8. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1975 Sep;8(3):344-9 [PMID: 1167043]
  9. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001 Dec;45(12):3548-54 [PMID: 11709338]
  10. Mol Microbiol. 2002 Feb;43(3):677-85 [PMID: 11929524]
  11. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002 Oct;50(4):525-32 [PMID: 12356797]
  12. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002 Dec;46(12):3712-8 [PMID: 12435666]
  13. Trans Assoc Am Physicians. 1956;69:56-64 [PMID: 13380946]
  14. J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Jan;42(1):269-75 [PMID: 14715764]
  15. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004 Jun;48(6):1941-7 [PMID: 15155182]
  16. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004 Dec;54(6):1130-3 [PMID: 15486080]
  17. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004 Dec;48(12):4574-81 [PMID: 15561828]
  18. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2004 Dec;50(4):229-30 [PMID: 15582294]
  19. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992 Jan;36(1):223-6 [PMID: 1590693]
  20. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005 Aug;49(8):3311-6 [PMID: 16048941]
  21. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005 Oct;18(4):657-86 [PMID: 16223952]
  22. Pharm Res. 2006 Apr;23(4):729-41 [PMID: 16554956]
  23. Infect Immun. 1970 May;1(5):427-30 [PMID: 16557753]
  24. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2006 Jul;28(1):1-5 [PMID: 16769202]
  25. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1991 Jul;28(1):61-70 [PMID: 1769944]
  26. Curr Microbiol. 2009 Jan;58(1):18-24 [PMID: 18815831]
  27. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 Jan;53(1):46-56 [PMID: 18852268]
  28. J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Apr;47(4):969-74 [PMID: 19213695]
  29. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009 Apr;63(4):745-57 [PMID: 19218572]
  30. J Infect Chemother. 2009 Feb;15(1):18-22 [PMID: 19280295]
  31. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009 Jun;64(2):166-71 [PMID: 19304437]
  32. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 Aug;53(8):3437-41 [PMID: 19487449]
  33. J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Sep;47(9):2918-24 [PMID: 19605577]
  34. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1981 Sep;8 Suppl B:345-8 [PMID: 19803012]
  35. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010 May;54(5):2206-8 [PMID: 20211890]
  36. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1946 Nov;63(2):443-6 [PMID: 20277778]
  37. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Mar;35(3):560-6 [PMID: 2039208]
  38. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990 Nov;34(11):2070-4 [PMID: 2073099]
  39. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010 Nov;54(11):4739-43 [PMID: 20805390]
  40. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011 Dec;17(12):1798-803 [PMID: 21595793]
  41. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990 Apr;34(4):581-6 [PMID: 2188586]
  42. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1990 Apr;25(4):621-7 [PMID: 2190971]
  43. J Invest Surg. 2012 Apr;25(2):67-77 [PMID: 22439833]
  44. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 Aug;56(8):4474-7 [PMID: 22585225]
  45. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012 Oct;67(10):2424-8 [PMID: 22665388]
  46. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Jan;57(1):196-204 [PMID: 23089750]
  47. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Mar;57(3):1434-41 [PMID: 23295932]
  48. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1990 Mar;9(3):201-5 [PMID: 2338089]
  49. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 May;57(5):2109-13 [PMID: 23439636]
  50. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e60033 [PMID: 23527296]
  51. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013 Dec;68(12):2773-8 [PMID: 23794599]
  52. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Sep;57(9):4276-4281 [PMID: 23796934]
  53. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2014 May;43(5):456-9 [PMID: 24690213]
  54. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014 Nov;20(11):O831-9 [PMID: 24813594]
  55. Microb Drug Resist. 2014 Dec;20(6):568-74 [PMID: 25000230]
  56. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989 Aug;33(8):1368-72 [PMID: 2508546]
  57. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 Nov;58(11):6931-3 [PMID: 25136006]
  58. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2014 Sep 12;13:45 [PMID: 25213463]
  59. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015 Feb;34(2):349-55 [PMID: 25213722]
  60. Clin Infect Dis. 2015 May 1;60(9):1319-25 [PMID: 25586681]
  61. Nat Chem Biol. 2015 Mar;11(3):182-8 [PMID: 25689336]
  62. J Infect. 2015 Jun;71 Suppl 1:S10-4 [PMID: 25917803]
  63. Crit Care. 2015 May 06;19:219 [PMID: 25944081]
  64. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015 Aug;21(8):788.e1-788.e13 [PMID: 25980353]
  65. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Aug;59(8):5014-7 [PMID: 25987630]
  66. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015 Aug;36(8):981-5 [PMID: 25990361]
  67. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015 Jul;28(3):603-61 [PMID: 26016486]
  68. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:568079 [PMID: 26064923]
  69. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989 Nov;33(11):1878-82 [PMID: 2610499]
  70. Mol Syst Biol. 2015 Jul 29;11(7):822 [PMID: 26227664]
  71. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015 Nov;83(3):286-91 [PMID: 26277619]
  72. BMC Pulm Med. 2015 Aug 19;15:94 [PMID: 26286268]
  73. Circulation. 2015 Oct 13;132(15):1435-86 [PMID: 26373316]
  74. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Mar 25;60(4):1967-73 [PMID: 26729494]
  75. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Oct 21;60(11):6928-6932 [PMID: 27572417]
  76. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Nov;37(11):1288-1301 [PMID: 27573805]
  77. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017 Feb;36(2):285-294 [PMID: 27714592]
  78. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2016 Dec;48(6):719-724 [PMID: 27773498]
  79. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Jul 1;72(7):1911-1914 [PMID: 28369441]
  80. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 May 24;61(6): [PMID: 28373200]
  81. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Jun 27;61(7): [PMID: 28483961]
  82. Infect Dis (Auckl). 2017 May 22;10:1179916117703999 [PMID: 28579798]
  83. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Feb;24(2):152-158 [PMID: 28694202]
  84. MBio. 2017 Jul 25;8(4): [PMID: 28743810]
  85. J Infect Chemother. 2018 Mar;24(3):212-215 [PMID: 29198902]
  86. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2018 Mar;32(1):119-128 [PMID: 29233576]
  87. J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Jul 26;56(8): [PMID: 29769277]
  88. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Jul 27;62(8): [PMID: 29784837]
  89. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Jul 27;62(8): [PMID: 29891607]
  90. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018 May 23;5(6):ofy123 [PMID: 29977970]
  91. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Oct 24;62(11): [PMID: 30150459]
  92. JAMA. 2018 Sep 11;320(10):984-994 [PMID: 30208454]
  93. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Jan;38(1):67-74 [PMID: 30269181]
  94. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 May;13(5):861-4 [PMID: 307367]
  95. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1987 Nov;20(5):639-44 [PMID: 3429369]
  96. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986 May;29(5):748-52 [PMID: 3460523]
  97. South Med J. 1985 Jun;78(6):643-6 [PMID: 3873708]
  98. Chemotherapy. 1985;31(2):102-11 [PMID: 3921317]
  99. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 Nov;28(5):601-6 [PMID: 4091525]
  100. Appl Microbiol. 1971 Nov;22(5):870-5 [PMID: 4332044]
  101. Infect Immun. 1974 Dec;10(6):1256-9 [PMID: 4611923]
  102. Chemotherapy. 1971;16(1):18-28 [PMID: 4994994]
  103. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Jul;26(1):42-7 [PMID: 6433787]
  104. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Mar;17(3):393-6 [PMID: 6448575]
  105. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Aug;24(2):287-9 [PMID: 6605716]
  106. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Nov;22(5):832-8 [PMID: 6891198]
  107. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Nov;22(5):923-5 [PMID: 6983863]
  108. Am J Med. 1978 Nov;65(5):729-37 [PMID: 707532]
  109. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995 Jun;35(6):765-73 [PMID: 7559188]
  110. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995 Feb;39(2):380-5 [PMID: 7726502]
  111. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1994 Dec;34(6):909-20 [PMID: 7730234]
  112. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994 May;38(5):1112-7 [PMID: 8067747]
  113. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Jan;31 Suppl A:23-8 [PMID: 8383653]
  114. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 Feb;37(2):203-6 [PMID: 8452349]
  115. J Infect Dis. 1993 Jun;167(6):1401-5 [PMID: 8501331]
  116. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996 Sep;15(9):761-3 [PMID: 8922582]
  117. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997 Jan;41(1):7-12 [PMID: 8980746]
  118. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996 Oct;26(2):95-8 [PMID: 8985663]
  119. QJM. 1996 Dec;89(12):933-41 [PMID: 9015487]
  120. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1997 Mar;16(3 Suppl):S49-55 [PMID: 9076836]
  121. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Jun;9(6):994-9 [PMID: 938029]
  122. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1998 Aug;42(2):227-32 [PMID: 9738841]
  123. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998 Oct;11(4):589-603 [PMID: 9767057]
  124. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1999 Jan;33(1):47-58 [PMID: 9990476]

Grants

  1. KL2 TR002002/NCATS NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Animals
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Bacterial Load
Disease Models, Animal
Gram-Negative Bacteria
Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections
Hydrolysis
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Staphylococcal Infections
Staphylococcus aureus
Treatment Outcome
beta-Lactamases
beta-Lactams

Chemicals

Anti-Bacterial Agents
beta-Lactams
beta-Lactamases

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0inoculumeffectvitroclinicalavailablepathogensstudiesattenuatedcurrentlywhetherβ-lactamβ-lactamsinvestigationscefazolinmayoutcomesβ-lactamaseenzymesmultiplephenomenonantibacterialactivityinoculautilizedsusceptibilitytestingreferredAlthoughreportedseveraldecadesdebatableclinicallysignificantaimpresentreviewconsolidateevidencesummarizedrugclassesdemonstratespecificbacterialReviewliteratureshowedmajorityevaluatedEscherichiacoliPseudomonasaeruginosaKlebsiellapneumoniaeHaemophilusinfluenzaeStaphylococcusaureusAcrossfivecephalosporinsconsistentlydisplayedobservableeffectswhereascarbapenemslesssusceptiblehandfulanimalvalidatedtranslatespharmacodynamicsvivosuggestedMSSAcorrespondincreasedlikelinessadversepatientsreceivingbacteraemiapresenceprimarymechanismresponsibleobservationlackingindicateslikelymechanismsresultneededbetterdefineinterventionsmadeclinicresponseorganismsdisplayingwilloptimizeInoculumantibiotics

Similar Articles

Cited By