Mid-term outcomes of endovascular repair for traumatic thoracic aortic injury: a single-center experience.

Shin-Ah Son, Hanna Jung, Joon Yong Cho, Tak-Hyuk Oh, Young Woo Do, Kyoung Hoon Lim, Gun-Jik Kim
Author Information
  1. Shin-Ah Son: Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, 130 Dongdeok-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu, Republic of Korea. ORCID
  2. Hanna Jung: Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, 130 Dongdeok-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu, Republic of Korea. ORCID
  3. Joon Yong Cho: Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, 130 Dongdeok-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu, Republic of Korea. ORCID
  4. Tak-Hyuk Oh: Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, 130 Dongdeok-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu, Republic of Korea. ORCID
  5. Young Woo Do: Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, 130 Dongdeok-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu, Republic of Korea. ORCID
  6. Kyoung Hoon Lim: Trauma Center, Department of Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea. ORCID
  7. Gun-Jik Kim: Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, 130 Dongdeok-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu, Republic of Korea. straightroot@knu.ac.kr. ORCID

Abstract

PURPOSE: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for traumatic thoracic aortic injury (TTAI) reports short-term benefits. However, long-term durability and the need of reintervention remain unclear. Here, we determined mid-term outcome of TEVAR for TTAI and investigated the influence of the length of proximal landing zone on aorta.
METHODS: Between October 2009 and February 2018, 69 patients diagnosed TTAI and 42 included patients underwent TEVAR. patients were divided into two groups by the length of proximal landing zone; ≤ 20 mm and > 20 mm. The primary endpoint was success and survival rate, and the secondary endpoint was the increase of aorta size and the need of reintervention.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 47.9 ± 29.6 months and 100% success rate. No endoleaks or additional reinterventions during the follow-up period. The cumulative survival of all-cause death was 90.5 ± 2.3%, 85.7 ± 4.1% and 61.7 ± 8.4% at 1, 5 and 7 years, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the increase of aorta size due to the length of the proximal landing zone (p = 0.65).
CONCLUSION: In selective TTAI patients for TEVAR, the length of proximal landing zone did not considerably influence the aorta size or needed further reintervention.

Keywords

References

  1. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Winter;21(4):393-8 [PMID: 20226354]
  2. J Trauma. 2006 Nov;61(5):1150-5 [PMID: 17099521]
  3. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Nov;152(5):1279-1288.e3 [PMID: 27453556]
  4. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Feb;76(2):510-6 [PMID: 24458059]
  5. N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 16;359(16):1708-16 [PMID: 18923173]
  6. J Vasc Surg. 2012 Oct;56(4):973-8 [PMID: 22608791]
  7. Circulation. 2010 Jun 29;121(25):2780-804 [PMID: 20530003]
  8. J Trauma. 1974 Mar;14(3):187-96 [PMID: 4814394]
  9. N Engl J Med. 1997 Feb 27;336(9):626-32 [PMID: 9032049]
  10. J Vasc Surg. 2010 Oct;52(4):1022-33, 1033.e15 [PMID: 20888533]
  11. J Vasc Surg. 2009 Jun;49(6):1403-8 [PMID: 19497498]
  12. Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Jul;50:140-147 [PMID: 29455010]
  13. J Trauma. 2001 Aug;51(2):346-51 [PMID: 11493798]
  14. J Vasc Surg. 2013 Mar;57(3):684-690.e1 [PMID: 23182152]
  15. J Trauma. 2005 Nov;59(5):1062-5 [PMID: 16385279]
  16. J Endovasc Ther. 2002 Jun;9 Suppl 2:II84-91 [PMID: 12166847]
  17. J Trauma. 1997 Mar;42(3):374-80; discussion 380-3 [PMID: 9095103]
  18. J Vasc Surg. 2012 Mar;55(3):652-8; discussion 658 [PMID: 22169662]
  19. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009 Jan;37(1):8-14 [PMID: 19008125]
  20. J Vasc Surg. 2015 Jan;61(1):73-9 [PMID: 25080884]
  21. N Engl J Med. 1994 Dec 29;331(26):1729-34 [PMID: 7984192]
  22. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Dec;148(6):2956-61 [PMID: 25240524]
  23. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 Dec;50(6):754-60 [PMID: 26371414]
  24. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002 Jun;21(6):959-63 [PMID: 12048070]
  25. J Endovasc Ther. 2002 Jun;9 Suppl 2:II98-105 [PMID: 12166849]
  26. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Oct;88(4):1258-63 [PMID: 19766818]

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aorta, Thoracic
Endoleak
Endovascular Procedures
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Reoperation
Retrospective Studies
Survival Analysis
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0TEVARTTAIlengthproximallandingzoneaortaaorticreinterventionpatientssizeendovascularrepairtraumaticthoracicneedinfluenceendpointsuccesssurvivalrateincreasefollow-upperiodPURPOSE:Thoracicinjuryreportsshort-termbenefitsHoweverlong-termdurabilityremainuncleardeterminedmid-termoutcomeinvestigatedMETHODS:October2009February201869diagnosed42includedunderwentPatientsdividedtwogroups ≤ 20 mmand > 20 mmprimarysecondaryRESULTS:mean479 ± 296 months100%endoleaksadditionalreinterventionscumulativeall-causedeath905 ± 23%857 ± 41%617 ± 84%157 yearsrespectivelystatisticallysignificantdifferenceduep = 065CONCLUSION:selectiveconsiderablyneededMid-termoutcomesinjury:single-centerexperienceAortaEndovascularprocedureStentsTrauma

Similar Articles

Cited By