Understanding health management and safety decisions using signal processing and machine learning.

Lisa Aufegger, Colin Bicknell, Emma Soane, Hutan Ashrafian, Ara Darzi
Author Information
  1. Lisa Aufegger: Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK. l.aufegger@imperial.ac.uk.
  2. Colin Bicknell: Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  3. Emma Soane: Department of Management, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
  4. Hutan Ashrafian: Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  5. Ara Darzi: Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Small group research in healthcare is important because it deals with interaction and decision-making processes that can help to identify and improve safer patient treatment and care. However, the number of studies is limited due to time- and resource-intensive data processing. The aim of this study was to examine the feasibility of using signal processing and machine learning techniques to understand teamwork and behaviour related to healthcare management and patient safety, and to contribute to literature and research of teamwork in healthcare.
METHODS: Clinical and non-clinical healthcare professionals organised into 28 teams took part in a video- and audio-recorded role-play exercise that represented a fictional healthcare system, and included the opportunity to discuss and improve healthcare management and patient safety. Group interactions were analysed using the recurrence quantification analysis (RQA; Knight et al., 2016), a signal processing method that examines stability, determinism, and complexity of group interactions. Data were benchmarked against self-reported quality of team participation and social support. Transcripts of group conversations were explored using the topic modelling approach (Blei et al., 2003), a machine learning method that helps to identify emerging themes within large corpora of qualitative data.
RESULTS: Groups exhibited stable group interactions that were positively correlated with perceived social support, and negatively correlated with predictive behaviour. Data processing of the qualitative data revealed conversations focused on: (1) the management of patient incidents; (2) the responsibilities among team members; (3) the importance of a good internal team environment; and (4) the hospital culture.
CONCLUSIONS: This study has shed new light on small group research using signal processing and machine learning methods. Future studies are encouraged to use these methods in the healthcare context, and to conduct further research on how the nature of group interaction and communication processes contribute to the quality of team and task decision-making.

References

  1. BMJ. 2015 Jun 02;350:h2622 [PMID: 26037412]
  2. Med Eng Phys. 2002 Jan;24(1):53-60 [PMID: 11891140]
  3. Res Dev Disabil. 2018 Oct;81:1-11 [PMID: 29786528]
  4. J Appl Psychol. 2003 Aug;88(4):587-604 [PMID: 12940401]
  5. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Feb;40(1):145-58 [PMID: 23750969]
  6. Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Nov;15(11):1002-9 [PMID: 18828828]
  7. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2007 Dec;2(4):396-403 [PMID: 26151975]
  8. Hum Factors. 2012 Aug;54(4):503-17 [PMID: 22908675]
  9. Am J Pharm Educ. 2010 Oct 11;74(8):141 [PMID: 21179252]
  10. Ergonomics. 2009 Oct;52(10):1185-95 [PMID: 19787499]
  11. Int J Appl Sci Technol. 2014 Oct;4(5):9-19 [PMID: 25664257]
  12. Educ Psychol Meas. 2016 Feb;76(1):64-87 [PMID: 29795857]
  13. Med Care Res Rev. 2006 Jun;63(3):263-300 [PMID: 16651394]
  14. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Jul;83(1):126-37 [PMID: 12088122]
  15. Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 28;8:1135 [PMID: 28804466]
  16. Multivariate Behav Res. 1966 Apr 1;1(2):245-76 [PMID: 26828106]
  17. J Fam Psychol. 2012 Oct;26(5):816-27 [PMID: 22888778]
  18. J Interprof Care. 2008 Mar;22(2):191-203 [PMID: 18320453]
  19. Psychol Bull. 1965 Jun;63:384-99 [PMID: 14314073]

MeSH Term

Decision Making
Humans
Machine Learning
Patient Care Management
Patient Care Team
Patient Safety
Surveys and Questionnaires

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0healthcaregroupprocessingusingresearchpatientsignalmachinelearningmanagementteamdatasafetyinteractionsinteractiondecision-makingprocessesidentifyimprovestudiesstudyteamworkbehaviourcontributeetalmethodDataqualitysocialsupportconversationsqualitativecorrelatedmethodsBACKGROUND:SmallimportantdealscanhelpsafertreatmentcareHowevernumberlimitedduetime-resource-intensiveaimexaminefeasibilitytechniquesunderstandrelatedliteratureMETHODS:Clinicalnon-clinicalprofessionalsorganised28teamstookpartvideo-audio-recordedrole-playexerciserepresentedfictionalsystemincludedopportunitydiscussGroupanalysedthe recurrencequantificationanalysisRQA Knight2016examinesstabilitydeterminismcomplexitybenchmarkedself-reportedparticipationTranscriptsexploredtopicmodellingapproachBlei2003helpsemergingthemeswithinlargecorporaRESULTS:Groupsexhibitedstablepositivelyperceivednegativelypredictiverevealedfocusedon:1incidents2responsibilitiesamongmembers3importancegoodinternalenvironment4hospitalcultureCONCLUSIONS:shednewlightsmallFutureencouragedusecontextconductnaturecommunicationtaskUnderstandinghealthdecisions

Similar Articles

Cited By