Effects of RF-EMF on the Human Resting-State EEG-the Inconsistencies in the Consistency. Part 1: Non-Exposure-Related Limitations of Comparability Between Studies.

Heidi Danker-Hopfe, Torsten Eggert, Hans Dorn, Cornelia Sauter
Author Information
  1. Heidi Danker-Hopfe: Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Competence Centre of Sleep Medicine at Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charit��-Universit��tsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. ORCID
  2. Torsten Eggert: Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Competence Centre of Sleep Medicine at Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charit��-Universit��tsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
  3. Hans Dorn: Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Competence Centre of Sleep Medicine at Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charit��-Universit��tsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
  4. Cornelia Sauter: Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Competence Centre of Sleep Medicine at Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charit��-Universit��tsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Abstract

The results of studies on possible effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMFs) on Human waking electroencephalography (EEG) have been quite heterogeneous. In the majority of studies, changes in the alpha-frequency range in subjects who were exposed to different signals of mobile phone-related EMF sources were observed, whereas other studies did not report any effects. In this review, possible reasons for these inconsistencies are presented and recommendations for future waking EEG studies are made. The physiological basis of underlying brain activity, and the technical requirements and framework conditions for conducting and analyzing the Human resting-state EEG are discussed. Peer-reviewed articles on possible effects of EMF on waking EEG were evaluated with regard to non-exposure-related confounding factors. Recommendations derived from international guidelines on the analysis and reporting of findings are proposed to achieve comparability in future studies. In total, 22 peer-reviewed studies on possible RF-EMF effects on Human resting-state EEG were analyzed. EEG power in the alpha frequency range was reported to be increased in 10, decreased in four, and not affected in eight studies. All reviewed studies differ in several ways in terms of the methodologies applied, which might contribute to different results and conclusions about the impact of EMF on Human resting-state EEG. A discussion of various study protocols and different outcome parameters prevents a scientifically sound statement on the impact of RF-EMF on Human brain activity in resting-state EEG. Further studies which apply comparable, standardized study protocols are recommended. Bioelectromagnetics. 2019;40:291-318. �� 2019 The Authors. Bioelectromagnetics Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords

References

  1. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1982 Jan;53(1):119-24 [PMID: 6173196]
  2. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2011 Apr;29(2):163-70 [PMID: 21134438]
  3. Radiat Res. 2015 Dec;184(6):568-77 [PMID: 26600173]
  4. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013 Jul;124(7):1303-8 [PMID: 23428307]
  5. Clin Electroencephalogr. 1994 Apr;25(2):81-5 [PMID: 8194192]
  6. Bioelectromagnetics. 2011 Jul;32(5):417-21 [PMID: 21404307]
  7. Bioelectromagnetics. 2008 Oct;29(7):527-38 [PMID: 18452168]
  8. Health Phys. 1998 Apr;74(4):494-522 [PMID: 9525427]
  9. Neuroreport. 2000 Oct 20;11(15):3321-5 [PMID: 11059895]
  10. Neuroreport. 2004 Nov 15;15(16):2557-60 [PMID: 15538195]
  11. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2014 Sep;124:412-20 [PMID: 25073015]
  12. Neuropsychobiology. 2012;66(4):201-20 [PMID: 23075830]
  13. Bioelectromagnetics. 2010 Sep;31(6):434-44 [PMID: 20564174]
  14. Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Jan;127(1):409-418 [PMID: 26051750]
  15. Bioelectromagnetics. 2013 Jan;34(1):31-42 [PMID: 22674213]
  16. BMJ. 2017 Jun 30;357:j2835 [PMID: 28667088]
  17. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1976 Feb;40(2):113-31 [PMID: 55353]
  18. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Apr;147(4):571-2 [PMID: 19327444]
  19. Biol Psychiatry. 2002 Oct 15;52(8):831-42 [PMID: 12372655]
  20. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1982;7(1):75-90 [PMID: 7100370]
  21. Int J Psychophysiol. 2012 May;84(2):164-71 [PMID: 22326594]
  22. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2009 Jul;204(4):573-85 [PMID: 19241060]
  23. Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao. 2010 Jul;8(7):604-12 [PMID: 20619135]
  24. Clin Neurophysiol. 2012 Jan;123(1):121-8 [PMID: 21873111]
  25. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2017 May;48(3):168-175 [PMID: 27118764]
  26. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2000 Apr;26(2):87-92 [PMID: 10817372]
  27. Prog Neurobiol. 2007 Dec;83(6):375-400 [PMID: 17870229]
  28. Lancet. 2001 Apr 14;357(9263):1191-4 [PMID: 11323066]
  29. Neuropsychobiology. 2015;72(3-4):165-77 [PMID: 26900936]
  30. J Sleep Res. 2000 Sep;9(3):243-8 [PMID: 11012862]
  31. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995 Jan;94(1):1-5 [PMID: 7530634]
  32. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1990 Apr;7(2):163-89 [PMID: 2187019]
  33. Bioelectromagnetics. 2008 Jan;29(1):1-10 [PMID: 17786925]
  34. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1980 Sep;49(5-6):636-45 [PMID: 6158443]
  35. Sleep Med. 2013 Sep;14(9):902-12 [PMID: 23770159]
  36. Int J Radiat Biol. 2008 Jan;84(1):69-79 [PMID: 18058332]
  37. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2003 Apr;27(4):607-15 [PMID: 12711923]
  38. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012 Feb;20(1):71-5 [PMID: 21875223]
  39. Int J Psychophysiol. 1984 Mar;1(3):241-54 [PMID: 6394561]
  40. Psychophysiology. 2012 Apr;49(4):549-65 [PMID: 22176204]
  41. Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Apr 1;46(2):746-755 [PMID: 28025257]
  42. Int J Neurosci. 1998 Feb;93(1-2):87-100 [PMID: 9604172]
  43. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2000;28(1-2):323-37 [PMID: 10999398]
  44. Int J Radiat Biol. 2011 Nov;87(11):1077-85 [PMID: 21913816]
  45. Neurosci Lett. 2008 Aug 22;441(2):188-92 [PMID: 18577422]
  46. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2007 Dec;30(4):274-80 [PMID: 18274067]
  47. Bioelectromagnetics. 1997;18(2):172-6 [PMID: 9084868]
  48. Neuropsychobiology. 1999;39(2):92-100 [PMID: 10072666]
  49. J Pineal Res. 1999 Nov;27(4):237-42 [PMID: 10551772]
  50. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002 Oct;113(10):1623-32 [PMID: 12350439]
  51. Brain Res. 2014 Aug 19;1577:36-44 [PMID: 25010817]
  52. Neuroimage. 2013 Feb 15;67:111-8 [PMID: 23123297]
  53. Neuroreport. 2005 Nov 28;16(17):1973-6 [PMID: 16272890]
  54. Int J Neurosci. 2003 Jul;113(7):1007-19 [PMID: 12881192]
  55. Sleep. 2017 May 1;40(5): [PMID: 28329120]
  56. BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c869 [PMID: 20332511]
  57. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1985 May;60(5):394-406 [PMID: 2580690]
  58. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Oct;122(10):2010-5 [PMID: 21489866]
  59. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2006;2006:3751-4 [PMID: 17946579]
  60. Sci Rep. 2015 Sep 23;5:14434 [PMID: 26395526]
  61. Clin Investig. 1993 Mar;71(3):197-207 [PMID: 8481621]
  62. Bioelectromagnetics. 2013 May;34(4):264-74 [PMID: 23280729]
  63. Int J Surg. 2012;10(1):28-55 [PMID: 22036893]
  64. PLoS One. 2015 Jun 08;10(6):e0129496 [PMID: 26053854]
  65. Neuropsychobiology. 2005;52(2):71-6 [PMID: 15990459]
  66. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001 May;112(5):806-14 [PMID: 11336896]
  67. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2003 Dec;26(4):162-7 [PMID: 14995060]
  68. J Neurophysiol. 2015 Apr 1;113(7):2753-9 [PMID: 25695646]
  69. Eur J Med Res. 1995 Oct 16;1(1):27-32 [PMID: 9392690]
  70. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1987 Apr;4(2):121-33 [PMID: 3624457]
  71. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Aug;126(8):1468-81 [PMID: 25511636]
  72. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1987 Jun;66(6):489-501 [PMID: 2438114]
  73. Psychophysiology. 2011 Dec;48(12):1711-25 [PMID: 21895683]
  74. J Neurosci Methods. 2007 Aug 15;164(1):177-90 [PMID: 17517438]
  75. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1989 Sep;73(3):179-87 [PMID: 2475322]
  76. Bioelectromagnetics. 2008 Sep;29(6):479-87 [PMID: 18431738]
  77. Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Feb;125(2):277-86 [PMID: 24012322]
  78. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Apr;126(4):659-66 [PMID: 25163416]
  79. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1995 Mar;12(2):116-31 [PMID: 7797626]
  80. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 Feb;121(2):163-71 [PMID: 20005167]
  81. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001 Jun;112(6):997-1000 [PMID: 11377257]
  82. J Sleep Res. 2010 Mar;19(1 Pt 2):214-27 [PMID: 19840240]
  83. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2010 Mar;121(3):161-73 [PMID: 20148773]
  84. Environ Health Perspect. 2007 Mar;115(3):416-24 [PMID: 17431492]
  85. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 Dec;121(12):1981-91 [PMID: 20547470]
  86. Psychophysiology. 2005 Nov;42(6):691-7 [PMID: 16364064]
  87. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013 Jun;60(6):1702-10 [PMID: 23358937]
  88. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Aug;122(8):1505-17 [PMID: 21349761]
  89. Psychophysiology. 1992 Sep;29(5):576-92 [PMID: 1410187]
  90. Front Psychol. 2013 Nov 26;4:863 [PMID: 24324449]
  91. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Nov;116(11):2693-700 [PMID: 16221568]
  92. J Grad Med Educ. 2012 Sep;4(3):279-82 [PMID: 23997866]
  93. Neurophysiol Clin. 2000 Feb;30(1):5-19 [PMID: 10740792]
  94. Neurosci Res. 2005 Nov;53(3):265-70 [PMID: 16102863]
  95. Eur J Neurosci. 2007 Mar;25(6):1908-13 [PMID: 17432975]
  96. J Neurosci. 2009 Sep 2;29(35):10855-62 [PMID: 19726643]
  97. Neuroreport. 2007 May 28;18(8):803-7 [PMID: 17471070]
  98. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Feb 04;9:11 [PMID: 25698950]
  99. Front Aging Neurosci. 2013 Dec 27;5:100 [PMID: 24409145]
  100. Neuropadiatrie. 1971 Feb;2(3):247-304 [PMID: 5171359]

MeSH Term

Brain
Cell Phone
Electroencephalography
Electromagnetic Fields
Female
Humans
Male
Radiation Exposure
Radio Waves

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0studiesEEGhumanpossibleeffectsresting-statewakingdifferentEMFbrainactivityRF-EMFresultsradiofrequencyelectroencephalographyrangemobilefuturepoweralphaimpactstudyprotocolsBioelectromagnetics2019electromagneticfieldsRF-EMFsquiteheterogeneousmajoritychangesalpha-frequencysubjectsexposedsignalsphone-relatedsourcesobservedwhereasreportreviewreasonsinconsistenciespresentedrecommendationsmadephysiologicalbasisunderlyingtechnicalrequirementsframeworkconditionsconductinganalyzingdiscussedPeer-reviewedarticlesevaluatedregardnon-exposure-relatedconfoundingfactorsRecommendationsderivedinternationalguidelinesanalysisreportingfindingsproposedachievecomparabilitytotal22peer-reviewedanalyzedfrequencyreportedincreased10decreasedfouraffectedeightrevieweddifferseveralwaystermsmethodologiesappliedmightcontributeconclusionsdiscussionvariousoutcomeparameterspreventsscientificallysoundstatementapplycomparablestandardizedrecommended40:291-318��AuthorsPublishedWileyPeriodicalsIncEffectsHumanResting-StateEEG-theInconsistenciesConsistencyPart1:Non-Exposure-RelatedLimitationsComparabilityStudiesbandphone

Similar Articles

Cited By