Persistence of the immune response after 4CMenB vaccination, and the response to an additional booster dose in infants, children, adolescents, and young adults.

Federico Martinón-Torres, Terry Nolan, Daniela Toneatto, Angelika Banzhoff
Author Information
  1. Federico Martinón-Torres: Translational Pediatrics and Infectious Diseases Section, Pediatrics Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. ORCID
  2. Terry Nolan: School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, and Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. ORCID
  3. Daniela Toneatto: GSK, Siena, Italy. ORCID
  4. Angelika Banzhoff: GSK, Marburg, Germany. ORCID

Abstract

The multicomponent meningococcal serogroup B vaccine, 4CMenB, has demonstrated effectiveness in preventing invasive MenB disease in infants and in controlling MenB outbreaks. The need for/timing of additional booster doses is not yet established. We reviewed eight studies that evaluated antibody persistence and booster following primary 4CMenB vaccination of infants, children, adolescents, and young adults. Putative seroprotective hSBA titers for ≥1 vaccine antigen were maintained by 76-100% of children 24-36 months after priming during infancy and in 84-100% after priming in the second year of life. hSBA levels were higher in vaccinees at 4 and 7.5 years following priming during adolescence than in vaccine-naïve individuals of a similar age. Antibodies persisted at higher levels to NHBA and NadA than to PorA or fHbp. Booster vaccination induced robust anamnestic responses, demonstrating effective priming by 4CMenB across age-groups. These data can inform decision-making to optimize vaccination strategies.

Keywords

References

  1. Vaccine. 2013 Oct 9;31(43):4968-74 [PMID: 23954380]
  2. J Infect. 2018 Mar;76(3):258-269 [PMID: 29253560]
  3. mSphere. 2017 Nov 15;2(6):null [PMID: 29152576]
  4. Pediatrics. 2015 May;135(5):798-804 [PMID: 25917990]
  5. Lancet. 2016 Dec 3;388(10061):2775-2782 [PMID: 28100432]
  6. Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 27;8(1):3700 [PMID: 29487324]
  7. Vaccine. 2011 Feb 24;29(10):1968-73 [PMID: 21241734]
  8. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Feb 23;107(8):3770-5 [PMID: 20133713]
  9. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2018 May;37(5):475-482 [PMID: 29329168]
  10. Lancet. 2014 Dec 13;384(9960):2123-31 [PMID: 25145775]
  11. J Adolesc Health. 2016 Aug;59(2 Suppl):S12-20 [PMID: 27449145]
  12. Vaccine. 2015 Sep 22;33(39):5217-24 [PMID: 26232542]
  13. Vaccine. 2015 Jul 31;33(32):3850-8 [PMID: 26141011]
  14. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2014 Jul;33(7):760-6 [PMID: 24722351]
  15. CMAJ. 2017 Oct 16;189(41):E1276-E1285 [PMID: 29038320]
  16. Vaccine. 2005 Mar 18;23(17-18):2206-9 [PMID: 15755596]
  17. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2019 Apr;18(4):343-352 [PMID: 30741040]
  18. Vaccine. 1998 May-Jun;16(9-10):921-7 [PMID: 9682338]
  19. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2016 May;15(5):641-58 [PMID: 26651380]
  20. Clin Infect Dis. 2017 May 1;64(9):1263-1267 [PMID: 28207068]
  21. CMAJ. 2015 Apr 21;187(7):E215-E223 [PMID: 25802309]
  22. CMAJ. 2013 Oct 15;185(15):E715-24 [PMID: 24062178]
  23. Vaccine. 2010 Jul 12;28(31):5023-30 [PMID: 20493284]
  24. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2017 Apr;16(4):313-328 [PMID: 27820969]
  25. J Exp Med. 2003 Mar 17;197(6):789-99 [PMID: 12642606]
  26. J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Aug;44(8):2743-9 [PMID: 16891487]
  27. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016 Dec 1;22 Suppl 5:S103-S112 [PMID: 27129415]
  28. Vaccine. 2017 Jan 11;35(3):427-434 [PMID: 27912986]
  29. Vaccine. 2006 Jun 12;24(24):5093-107 [PMID: 16838413]
  30. Vaccine. 2005 Mar 18;23(17-18):2222-7 [PMID: 15755600]
  31. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017 Jul;23(7):1184-1187 [PMID: 28409739]
  32. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2013 Oct;32(10):1116-21 [PMID: 23958808]
  33. Vaccine. 2017 Jan 5;35(2):395-402 [PMID: 27914744]
  34. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2017 May;16(5):433-451 [PMID: 28375029]
  35. Vaccine. 2019 Feb 21;37(9):1209-1218 [PMID: 30691980]
  36. Vaccine. 2012 May 30;30 Suppl 2:B87-97 [PMID: 22607904]
  37. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2013 Jun;77(2):234-52 [PMID: 23699256]
  38. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013 May;13(5):416-25 [PMID: 23414709]
  39. Vaccine. 2010 Aug 23;28(37):6086-93 [PMID: 20619376]
  40. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013 Nov;9(11):2304-10 [PMID: 23811804]
  41. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 May 27;65(20):520-1 [PMID: 27227576]
  42. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2016 Apr;35(4):e113-23 [PMID: 26756390]
  43. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013 Jan;9(1):162-71 [PMID: 23108355]
  44. Mol Microbiol. 2005 Feb;55(3):687-98 [PMID: 15660996]
  45. Hum Vaccin. 2011 May;7(5):511-22 [PMID: 21441782]
  46. Vaccine. 2009 Jun 24;27 Suppl 2:B51-63 [PMID: 19477562]
  47. Lancet. 2013 Mar 9;381(9869):825-35 [PMID: 23324563]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Antibodies, Bacterial
Clinical Studies as Topic
Female
Humans
Immunization Schedule
Immunization, Secondary
Immunogenicity, Vaccine
Infant
Male
Meningococcal Infections
Meningococcal Vaccines
Serogroup
Young Adult

Chemicals

4CMenB vaccine
Antibodies, Bacterial
Meningococcal Vaccines

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.04CMenBvaccinationpriminginfantsboosterchildrenmeningococcalserogroupBvaccineMenBadditionalantibodypersistencefollowingadolescentsyoungadultshSBAlevelshigherresponsemulticomponentdemonstratedeffectivenesspreventinginvasivediseasecontrollingoutbreaksneedfor/timingdosesyetestablishedreviewedeightstudiesevaluatedprimaryPutativeseroprotectivetiters≥1antigenmaintained76-100%24-36monthsinfancy84-100%secondyearlifevaccinees475yearsadolescencevaccine-naïveindividualssimilarageAntibodiespersistedNHBANadAPorAfHbpBoosterinducedrobustanamnesticresponsesdemonstratingeffectiveacrossage-groupsdatacaninformdecision-makingoptimizestrategiesPersistenceimmunedoseNeisseriameningitidisimmunogenicity

Similar Articles

Cited By