Foraging Fungus-Growing Termites Avoid a Mycopathogen but Not an Entomopathogen.

Kasun H Bodawatta, Michael Poulsen, Nick Bos
Author Information
  1. Kasun H Bodawatta: Section for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen East, Denmark. ORCID
  2. Michael Poulsen: Section for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen East, Denmark. mpoulsen@bio.ku.dk. ORCID
  3. Nick Bos: Section for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen East, Denmark.

Abstract

Fungus-growing termites have to defend both themselves and their monoculture fungal cultivars from antagonistic microbes. One of the ways that pathogens can enter the termite colony is on the plant substrate that is collected by termite foragers. In order to understand whether foragers avoid substrate infected with antagonists, we offered sub-colonies of a choice between food exposed to either a mycopathogenic or an entomopathogenic fungus, and control food. Workers did not show any preference between entomopathogen-exposed and control substrate, but significantly avoided the mycopathogen-exposed substrate. This suggests that the behaviour of foraging workers is more strongly influenced by pathogens affecting their crop than those posing risks to the termite workers themselves.

Keywords

References

  1. Oecologia. 2001 Jun;128(1):99-106 [PMID: 28547096]
  2. Science. 1966 Aug 5;153(3736):587-604 [PMID: 17757227]
  3. Insect Mol Biol. 2018 Oct;27(5):564-576 [PMID: 29663551]
  4. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2010 Aug;2(4):534-540 [PMID: 22896766]
  5. J Evol Biol. 2012 Feb;25(2):342-51 [PMID: 22122288]
  6. Biol Lett. 2009 Aug 23;5(4):446-8 [PMID: 19411266]
  7. J Invertebr Pathol. 2011 Jun;107(2):100-6 [PMID: 21414322]
  8. J Chem Ecol. 1982 Jan;8(1):147-61 [PMID: 24414591]
  9. J Econ Entomol. 2015 Jun;108(3):1243-50 [PMID: 26470252]
  10. J Transl Med. 2012 May 31;10:112 [PMID: 22650233]
  11. Curr Biol. 2005 May 10;15(9):851-5 [PMID: 15886104]
  12. Toxins (Basel). 2019 Apr 29;11(5): [PMID: 31035652]
  13. Insects. 2012 Aug 15;3(3):789-820 [PMID: 26466629]
  14. J Insect Physiol. 2009 Sep;55(9):774-80 [PMID: 19442668]
  15. Sci Rep. 2013 Nov 19;3:3250 [PMID: 24248063]
  16. Curr Biol. 2007 Aug 21;17(16):R693-702 [PMID: 17714663]
  17. J Chem Ecol. 2017 Oct;43(10):986-995 [PMID: 29124530]
  18. Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Jun 22;276(1665):2263-9 [PMID: 19324734]
  19. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 May 22;268(1471):1033-9 [PMID: 11375087]
  20. J Evol Biol. 2010 Jul;23(7):1538-46 [PMID: 20500363]
  21. Nat Commun. 2018 Jun 7;9(1):2208 [PMID: 29880868]
  22. Oecologia. 2010 Jan;162(1):103-15 [PMID: 19690891]
  23. J Chem Ecol. 2013 Jan;39(1):101-8 [PMID: 23111683]
  24. Sci Rep. 2012;2:483 [PMID: 22761991]
  25. Curr Biol. 2010 Jul 13;20(13):R553-4 [PMID: 20619804]
  26. Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Jul 7;273(1594):1689-95 [PMID: 16769642]
  27. Insects. 2019 Mar 28;10(4): [PMID: 30925664]
  28. Curr Biol. 2010 Feb 9;20(3):249-52 [PMID: 20116243]
  29. Curr Biol. 2006 Dec 19;16(24):R1014-6 [PMID: 17174901]
  30. Microb Ecol. 2012 May;63(4):975-85 [PMID: 22173371]
  31. Genetica. 2016 Oct;144(5):547-552 [PMID: 27623784]
  32. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 May 26;370(1669): [PMID: 25870389]
  33. PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e22028 [PMID: 21857911]
  34. Dev Comp Immunol. 2012 Feb;36(2):372-7 [PMID: 21824492]
  35. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2003 Mar;61(1):1-9 [PMID: 12658509]
  36. Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 19;9(1):8819 [PMID: 31217550]
  37. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 8;105(14):5435-40 [PMID: 18362345]
  38. Science. 2005 Feb 4;307(5710):741-4 [PMID: 15692054]
  39. Environ Microbiol. 2015 Aug;17(8):2562-72 [PMID: 25581852]
  40. Environ Microbiol. 2018 Mar;20(3):971-979 [PMID: 29235709]
  41. Science. 2009 Nov 20;326(5956):1103-6 [PMID: 19965427]

Grants

  1. 10101/Villum Fonden
  2. SR17/1384/British Ecological Society
  3. ERC-2017-COG 771349/H2020 European Research Council

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0substratetermitepathogensforagersfoodcontrolworkersFungus-growingtermitesdefendmonoculturefungalcultivarsantagonisticmicrobesOnewayscanentercolonyplantcollectedorderunderstandwhetheravoidinfectedantagonistsofferedsub-colonieschoiceexposedeithermycopathogenicentomopathogenicfungusWorkersshowpreferenceentomopathogen-exposedsignificantlyavoidedmycopathogen-exposedsuggestsbehaviourforagingstronglyinfluencedaffectingcropposingrisksthemselvesForagingFungus-GrowingTermitesAvoidMycopathogenEntomopathogenBeauveriaTermitomycesTrichodermadefencesocialimmunity

Similar Articles

Cited By (5)