Effect of mobile text message reminders on routine childhood vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zeleke Abebaw Mekonnen, Kassahun Alemu Gelaye, Martin C Were, Kassahun Dessie Gashu, Binyam Chakilu Tilahun
Author Information
  1. Zeleke Abebaw Mekonnen: Department of Health Informatics, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia. zelekeabebaw7@gmail.com.
  2. Kassahun Alemu Gelaye: Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
  3. Martin C Were: Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA.
  4. Kassahun Dessie Gashu: Department of Health Informatics, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
  5. Binyam Chakilu Tilahun: Department of Health Informatics, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization estimates that 29% of under-five mortality could be prevented with existing vaccines. However, non-consistent attendance for immunization appointments remains a global challenge to healthcare providers. Thus, innovative strategies are required to reach the last mile where technology could be effectively utilized to achieve better compliance with children immunization schedules. Therefore, the aim of the review was to systematically collect and summarize the available evidence on the effectiveness of text message reminders on childhood vaccination.
METHODS: This review was conducted according to a priori published protocol on PROSPERO. A systematic literature search of databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane/Wiley library, and Science direct) was conducted. Eligibility and risk of bias assessments were performed independently by two reviewers. PRISMA flow diagrams were used to summarize the study selection process. Taking into account the level of heterogeneity, a random effects model was used and risk ratios with their 95% CI were used to present the pooled estimates. To investigate the sources of heterogeneity, subgroup analysis and meta-regression analysis were also considered. In this review, publication bias was assessed statistically using Harbord test.
RESULTS: A total of 1771 articles were searched. Out of those 1771 articles, 558 duplicated articles were removed. About 1213 articles were further screened, and finally, ten articles met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed that there is a significant effect of text message reminders on childhood vaccination coverage (RR = 1.11; 95% CI 1.05-1.17) with a moderate level of heterogeneity (I = 64.3%, P = 0.003). The results from the Harbord test suggested that there is no evidence for publication bias (P = 0.340).
CONCLUSION: This review highlights the potential benefits of incorporating mobile text message reminders into the standard management of childhood immunizations, especially in low- and middle-income countries. The frequency and timing of the text message reminders are also crucial in determining the effectiveness of text message reminders. Hence, mHealth interventions deserve more attention as a potential innovation to improve healthcare programs.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42017074230.

Keywords

References

  1. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Jun;24(6):1719-41 [PMID: 18474148]
  2. PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000100 [PMID: 19621070]
  3. BMC Public Health. 2015 Feb 12;15:137 [PMID: 25885862]
  4. Vaccine. 2015 Oct 26;33(43):5741-5746 [PMID: 26424607]
  5. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:153402 [PMID: 26380263]
  6. BMC Public Health. 2016 Feb 16;16:152 [PMID: 26880141]
  7. Am J Prev Med. 2000 Feb;18(2):132-9 [PMID: 10698243]
  8. BMJ Open. 2015 Oct 15;5(10):e008310 [PMID: 26474937]
  9. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 May 17;5(2):e72 [PMID: 27189422]
  10. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2018 Apr;71(2):103-112 [PMID: 29619782]
  11. J Med Internet Res. 2014 Oct 17;16(10):e222 [PMID: 25326646]
  12. BMC Public Health. 2014 Feb 21;14:188 [PMID: 24555733]
  13. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013 Aug;9(8):1802-11 [PMID: 23807361]
  14. Vaccine. 2015 Jun 9;33(25):2862-80 [PMID: 25944299]
  15. Vaccine. 2013 Jan 30;31(6):987-93 [PMID: 23246258]
  16. Glob Health Action. 2016 May 03;9:30963 [PMID: 27146444]
  17. Vaccine. 2012 Aug 3;30(36):5305-9 [PMID: 22750044]
  18. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2015;11(1):72-82 [PMID: 25483518]
  19. BMC Public Health. 2017 Mar 8;17(1):236 [PMID: 28270125]
  20. PLoS One. 2016 May 04;11(5):e0154664 [PMID: 27144393]
  21. BMC Public Health. 2008 May 16;8:161 [PMID: 18485194]
  22. Vaccine. 2016 May 5;34(21):2437-2443 [PMID: 27026145]
  23. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2012 Apr;9(2):66-77 [PMID: 22268959]
  24. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2013 Aug 06;1(2):160-71 [PMID: 25276529]
  25. JAMA. 2012 Apr 25;307(16):1702-8 [PMID: 22535855]
  26. PLoS Med. 2013;10(3):e1001405 [PMID: 23526886]
  27. West Afr J Med. 2015 Jan-Mar;34(1):3-10 [PMID: 26902809]
  28. Indian J Public Health. 2011 Oct-Dec;55(4):321-3 [PMID: 22298144]
  29. Vaccine. 2015 Jun 12;33(26):2984-9 [PMID: 25957663]
  30. J Infect Public Health. 2016 Nov - Dec;9(6):781-789 [PMID: 27659114]

MeSH Term

Caregivers
Cell Phone
Child, Preschool
Humans
Reminder Systems
Text Messaging
Vaccination
Vaccination Coverage

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0messagetextremindersreviewarticleschildhoodbiasusedheterogeneityestimatesimmunizationhealthcaresummarizeevidenceeffectivenessvaccinationconductedPROSPEROsystematicrisklevel95%CIanalysisalsopublicationHarbordtest1771meta-analysisP = 0potentialmobilemHealthBACKGROUND:WorldHealthOrganization29%under-fivemortalitypreventedexistingvaccinesHowevernon-consistentattendanceappointmentsremainsglobalchallengeprovidersThusinnovativestrategiesrequiredreachlastmiletechnologyeffectivelyutilizedachievebettercompliancechildrenschedulesThereforeaimsystematicallycollectavailableMETHODS:accordingprioripublishedprotocolliteraturesearchdatabasesPubMed/MEDLINEEMBASECochrane/WileylibrarySciencedirectEligibilityassessmentsperformedindependentlytworeviewersPRISMAflowdiagramsstudyselectionprocessTakingaccountrandomeffectsmodelratiospresentpooledinvestigatesourcessubgroupmeta-regressionconsideredassessedstatisticallyusingRESULTS:totalsearched558duplicatedremoved1213screenedfinallytenmetinclusioncriteriashowedsignificanteffectcoverageRR = 111105-117moderateI = 643%003resultssuggested340CONCLUSION:highlightsbenefitsincorporatingstandardmanagementimmunizationsespeciallylow-middle-incomecountriesfrequencytimingcrucialdeterminingHenceinterventionsdeserveattentioninnovationimproveprogramsSYSTEMATICREVIEWREGISTRATION:CRD42017074230Effectroutinevaccination:ImmunizationTextVaccination

Similar Articles

Cited By