Ecophysiology, genotoxicity, histopathology, and gene responses of naphthalene injected Colossoma macropomum (Cuvier, 1818) exposed to hypoxia.

Samara Silva de Souza, Grazyelle Sebrenski da Silva, Vera Maria Fonseca de Almeida-Val
Author Information
  1. Samara Silva de Souza: Laboratory of Ecophysiology and Molecular Evolution, National Institute for Research in the Amazon (INPA), Manaus, AM, Brazil. ORCID
  2. Grazyelle Sebrenski da Silva: Laboratory of Ecophysiology and Molecular Evolution, National Institute for Research in the Amazon (INPA), Manaus, AM, Brazil. ORCID
  3. Vera Maria Fonseca de Almeida-Val: Laboratory of Ecophysiology and Molecular Evolution, National Institute for Research in the Amazon (INPA), Manaus, AM, Brazil. ORCID

Abstract

The present study aimed to evaluate the biological responses of Colossoma macropomum to naphthalene injection and subsequent hypoxia exposure, emphasizing the expression of the tumor suppressor gene tp53. Tambaquis were intraperitoneally injected with naphthalene (50 mg/kg) and, after 96 hours, the fish were transferred to respirometry chambers and, submitted to progressive hypoxia for the determination of critical PO2. In a subsequent experiment, the fish received an intraperitoneal injection of naphthalene and were kept for 96 hours under normoxia. Successively, fish were challenged with acute hypoxia (PO2

References

  1. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 2000 Feb;125(2):219-26 [PMID: 10817909]
  2. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2001 Jan;280(1):R100-7 [PMID: 11124139]
  3. Mol Cell Biol. 2001 Feb;21(4):1297-310 [PMID: 11158315]
  4. Methods. 2001 Dec;25(4):402-8 [PMID: 11846609]
  5. Mol Cell Biol. 2002 Mar;22(6):1834-43 [PMID: 11865061]
  6. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2002 Nov;53(3):331-47 [PMID: 12485576]
  7. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2003 May;55(1):98-107 [PMID: 12706398]
  8. Clin Chim Acta. 1961 Jul;6:538-44 [PMID: 14453500]
  9. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2004 May;58(1):110-6 [PMID: 15087171]
  10. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2004 Feb;46(2):244-53 [PMID: 15106677]
  11. Anal Biochem. 1992 May 1;202(2):384-9 [PMID: 1519766]
  12. Nature. 1992 Mar 19;356(6366):215-21 [PMID: 1552940]
  13. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jan 11;102(2):407-12 [PMID: 15630097]
  14. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2005 Jan;140(1):115-21 [PMID: 15792630]
  15. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 2005 Jul;141(3):347-55 [PMID: 15950510]
  16. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2007 Feb;66(2):139-47 [PMID: 16466791]
  17. Toxicol Lett. 2006 Nov 1;167(1):27-33 [PMID: 17029827]
  18. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2007 Jun;26(2):225-39 [PMID: 17440684]
  19. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 2007 Dec;148(4):390-7 [PMID: 17822934]
  20. Aquat Toxicol. 2008 Feb 18;86(3):341-51 [PMID: 18180048]
  21. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2008 Jul 31;162(2):109-16 [PMID: 18555751]
  22. Aquat Toxicol. 2009 Apr 2;92(1):1-8 [PMID: 19185928]
  23. Cancer Res. 1991 Dec 1;51(23 Pt 1):6304-11 [PMID: 1933891]
  24. Neoplasia. 2009 Oct;11(10):976-86 [PMID: 19794957]
  25. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Nov 17;106(46):19485-90 [PMID: 19887629]
  26. Aquat Toxicol. 2010 Apr 15;97(2):134-41 [PMID: 20097436]
  27. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2010 May 3;99(2):93-9 [PMID: 20338776]
  28. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2010 Nov;299(5):C968-76 [PMID: 20810912]
  29. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2011 May;153(4):408-14 [PMID: 21320635]
  30. Ecotoxicology. 2011 Aug;20(6):1455-66 [PMID: 21656038]
  31. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2003 Feb;13(2):57-149 [PMID: 21782649]
  32. Chemosphere. 2012 Apr;87(4):413-22 [PMID: 22239943]
  33. Ecotoxicology. 2012 Apr;21(3):820-31 [PMID: 22307397]
  34. Ambio. 2012 Jul;41(5):456-66 [PMID: 22457077]
  35. Biotechnol Lett. 2012 Oct;34(10):1797-805 [PMID: 22714278]
  36. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2013 Aug;65(2):266-75 [PMID: 23539120]
  37. Ecotoxicology. 2013 Sep;22(7):1111-22 [PMID: 23836361]
  38. J Exp Biol. 2013 Dec 15;216(Pt 24):4590-600 [PMID: 24072802]
  39. Aquat Toxicol. 2014 Nov;156:201-10 [PMID: 25259779]
  40. Environ Toxicol. 2016 May;31(5):533-42 [PMID: 25359229]
  41. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2015 Jan;111:32-41 [PMID: 25450912]
  42. Mar Environ Res. 2015 Jul;108:33-44 [PMID: 25956543]
  43. Aquat Toxicol. 2016 Jan;170:52-61 [PMID: 26619215]
  44. Oncogenesis. 2016 Jan 25;5:e190 [PMID: 26807645]
  45. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2016 Oct;42(5):1307-18 [PMID: 26994906]
  46. PLoS One. 2016 Mar 28;11(3):e0152366 [PMID: 27018790]
  47. Aquat Toxicol. 2016 Aug;177:250-60 [PMID: 27315012]
  48. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Oct;23(19):19764-75 [PMID: 27411537]
  49. Chemosphere. 2016 Oct;161:454-462 [PMID: 27459156]
  50. J Exp Biol. 2017 Jul 15;220(Pt 14):2536-2544 [PMID: 28476894]
  51. Genet Mol Biol. 2017 Apr-Jun;40(2):491-501 [PMID: 28486571]
  52. Chemosphere. 2018 Jan;190:253-259 [PMID: 28992477]
  53. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019 Aug;222:49-58 [PMID: 31004834]
  54. Exp Cell Res. 1988 Mar;175(1):184-91 [PMID: 3345800]
  55. Respir Physiol. 1985 Mar;59(3):361-77 [PMID: 3992067]
  56. Am J Clin Pathol. 1971 Jul;56(1):35-9 [PMID: 5556212]
  57. Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248-54 [PMID: 942051]
  58. J Biol Chem. 1976 Oct 25;251(20):6183-8 [PMID: 977564]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0naphthalenehypoxiainjectionfishinjectedhoursresponsesColossomamacropomumsubsequentexposuregenetp5396PO2critalsoenvironmentspresentstudyaimedevaluatebiologicalemphasizingexpressiontumorsuppressorTambaquisintraperitoneally50mg/kgtransferredrespirometrychamberssubmittedprogressivedeterminationcriticalexperimentreceivedintraperitonealkeptnormoxiaSuccessivelychallengedacutePO26observedaffectedMoreoverhematologicalparametersmodulatedresponseFishpluspresentedalteredactivityGSTCATenzymesExposureresultedDNAdamagesinfluencedHypoxiaaccentuatedhepaticlesionscausedwellimpairedtranscriptionnaphtalenedemonstratingriskscontaminatingaquaticespeciallyhypoxicconditionscommonoccurdailyseasonalbasisAmazonbasinEcophysiologygenotoxicityhistopathologyCuvier1818exposed

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.