Trust and Rejection Sensitivity in Personality Disorders.

Anita Poggi, Juliette Richetin, Emanuele Preti
Author Information
  1. Anita Poggi: Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo, 1, 20126, Milano, Italy.
  2. Juliette Richetin: Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo, 1, 20126, Milano, Italy.
  3. Emanuele Preti: Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo, 1, 20126, Milano, Italy. emanuele.preti@unimib.it.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We review recent empirical investigations about two core processes subtending impairments in interpersonal functioning and, more precisely, cooperative behaviors in personality disorders: Trust toward others and rejection sensitivity. The main contributions are about borderline and narcissistic personality disorders but we report a little evidence about other personality disorders too (i.e., avoidant, antisocial, and paranoid personality disorders).
RECENT FINDINGS: Regarding borderline personality disorder, a misinterpretation of situations as threatening seems to be relevant for both trust and rejection sensitivity. With specific regard to narcissistic personality disorder, results suggest rejection sensitivity and distrust to be plausible risk factors for aggressive outbursts. Empirical findings display specific patterns of disturbances in rejection sensitivity and trust dynamics across different personality disorders. Nonetheless, further studies on personality disorders other than borderline or narcissistic personality disorder are needed. A deeper understanding may provide insight for better clinical management of such impairments among patients with personality disorders.

Keywords

References

  1. Psychol Med. 1999 Jul;29(4):943-51 [PMID: 10473321]
  2. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2000 Mar;23(1):103-22, vii-viii [PMID: 10729934]
  3. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Nov;79(5):748-62 [PMID: 11079239]
  4. Psychol Assess. 2001 Dec;13(4):531-42 [PMID: 11793896]
  5. Nat Neurosci. 2002 Mar;5(3):277-83 [PMID: 11850635]
  6. J Pers. 2002 Aug;70(4):509-32 [PMID: 12095189]
  7. Br J Psychiatry. 2003 Jan;182:5-7 [PMID: 12509310]
  8. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003 Feb;29(2):261-72 [PMID: 15272953]
  9. J Pers Assess. 1978 Oct;42(5):483-8 [PMID: 16367066]
  10. J Pers Assess. 1984 Jun;48(3):301-5 [PMID: 16367529]
  11. J Pers Disord. 2005 Dec;19(6):641-58 [PMID: 16553560]
  12. Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Nov;164(11):1637-40 [PMID: 17974925]
  13. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2008 Apr;49(4):359-75 [PMID: 18221345]
  14. J Pers Disord. 2008 Feb;22(1):22-41 [PMID: 18312121]
  15. Science. 2008 Aug 8;321(5890):806-10 [PMID: 18687957]
  16. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2011 Jul-Aug;18(4):275-83 [PMID: 21110407]
  17. J Abnorm Psychol. 2011 Aug;120(3):681-90 [PMID: 21500875]
  18. Personal Disord. 2011 Oct;2(4):243-60 [PMID: 22448801]
  19. J Pers. 2013 Feb;81(1):29-38 [PMID: 22583003]
  20. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Nov;103(5):854-78 [PMID: 22889074]
  21. Front Neurosci. 2013 Jan 14;6:195 [PMID: 23335877]
  22. Psychiatry Res. 2013 May 30;207(3):195-202 [PMID: 23419843]
  23. J Pers Disord. 2013 Aug;27(4):442-56 [PMID: 23586933]
  24. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Dec;105(6):1013-37 [PMID: 24128186]
  25. PLoS One. 2013 Nov 06;8(11):e73440 [PMID: 24223110]
  26. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2014 Jan;27(1):73-7 [PMID: 24270477]
  27. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Nov;9(11):1789-97 [PMID: 24273076]
  28. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015 Mar;10(3):335-41 [PMID: 24860084]
  29. Psychopathology. 2015;48(1):31-5 [PMID: 25277634]
  30. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 May;108(5):784-801 [PMID: 25545840]
  31. J Pers. 2016 Jun;84(3):361-8 [PMID: 25564936]
  32. Personal Disord. 2015 Oct;6(4):301-9 [PMID: 26147068]
  33. J Pers Disord. 2016 Oct;30(5):595-612 [PMID: 26623540]
  34. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Mar 30;10:125 [PMID: 27064696]
  35. Cognit Ther Res. 2016 Aug;40(4):510-521 [PMID: 27616800]
  36. Personal Disord. 2018 Mar;9(2):172-181 [PMID: 27831693]
  37. Personal Disord. 2017 Jul;8(3):281-286 [PMID: 27845530]
  38. Bull Menninger Clin. 1989 Nov;53(6):527-32 [PMID: 2819295]
  39. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2017 May 8;13:291-315 [PMID: 28301765]
  40. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Apr;71(4):989-1008 [PMID: 28303739]
  41. Clin Psychol Rev. 2017 Nov;57:59-74 [PMID: 28841457]
  42. Personal Disord. 2018 May;9(3):197-206 [PMID: 29745698]
  43. J Adolesc. 2018 Aug;67:45-54 [PMID: 29906692]
  44. J Abnorm Psychol. 2018 Oct;127(7):670-682 [PMID: 30102052]
  45. Assessment. 2018 Dec 12;:1073191118817866 [PMID: 30539642]
  46. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988 Oct;56(5):741-7 [PMID: 3192791]
  47. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1985 Sep;49(3):710-21 [PMID: 4045699]
  48. J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 1967 Jul;15(3):641-85 [PMID: 4861171]
  49. Behav Res Ther. 1970 Aug;8(3):249-66 [PMID: 5470377]
  50. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Jun;70(6):1327-43 [PMID: 8667172]

MeSH Term

Antisocial Personality Disorder
Borderline Personality Disorder
Humans
Interpersonal Relations
Narcissism
Personality Disorders
Rejection, Psychology
Trust

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0personalitydisorderssensitivityrejectionTrustborderlinenarcissisticdisorderimpairmentstrustspecificRejectionPersonalityPURPOSEOFREVIEW:reviewrecentempiricalinvestigationstwocoreprocessessubtendinginterpersonalfunctioningpreciselycooperativebehaviorsdisorders:towardothersmaincontributionsreportlittleevidenceieavoidantantisocialparanoidRECENTFINDINGS:RegardingmisinterpretationsituationsthreateningseemsrelevantregardresultssuggestdistrustplausibleriskfactorsaggressiveoutburstsEmpiricalfindingsdisplaypatternsdisturbancesdynamicsacrossdifferentNonethelessstudiesneededdeeperunderstandingmayprovideinsightbetterclinicalmanagementamongpatientsSensitivityDisordersInterpersonalSocialcognition

Similar Articles

Cited By (14)