Women Reduce the Performance Difference to Men with Increasing Age in Ultra-Marathon Running.

Karin J Waldvogel, Pantelis T Nikolaidis, Stefania Di Gangi, Thomas Rosemann, Beat Knechtle
Author Information
  1. Karin J Waldvogel: Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
  2. Pantelis T Nikolaidis: Exercise Physiology Laboratory, 18450 Nikaia, Greece. ORCID
  3. Stefania Di Gangi: Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
  4. Thomas Rosemann: Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland. ORCID
  5. Beat Knechtle: Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland. beat.knechtle@hispeed.ch. ORCID

Abstract

Age and sex are well-known factors influencing ultra-marathon race performance. The fact that women in older age groups are able to achieve a similar performance as men has been documented in swimming. In ultra-marathon running, knowledge is still limited. The aim of this study was to analyze sex-specific performance in ultra-marathon running according to age and distance. All ultra-marathon races documented in the online database of the German Society for Ultra-Marathon from 1964 to 2017 for 50-mile races (i.e., 231,980 records from 91,665 finishers) and from 1953 to 2017 for 100-mile races (i.e., 107,445 records from 39,870 finishers) were analyzed. In 50-mile races, race times were 11.74 ± 1.95 h for men and 12.31 ± 1.69 h for women. In 100-mile races, race times were 26.6 ± 3.49 h for men and 27.47 ± 3.6 h for women. The sex differences decreased with older age and were smaller in 100-mile (4.41%) than in 50-mile races (9.13%). The overall age of peak performance was 33 years for both distances. In summary, women reduced the performance difference to men with advancing age, the relative difference being smaller in 100-mile compared to 50-mile races. These findings might aid coaches and ultra-marathon runners set long-term training goals considering their sex and age.

Keywords

References

  1. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Dec;41(12):2191-8 [PMID: 19915499]
  2. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2014 Jan;69(1):38-46 [PMID: 24473558]
  3. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006 Oct;61(10):1059-64 [PMID: 17077199]
  4. Chin J Physiol. ;60(1):11-22 [PMID: 28052642]
  5. Res Sports Med. 2017 Jan-Mar;25(1):67-77 [PMID: 27868433]
  6. Int J Gen Med. 2013 Jun 05;6:427-38 [PMID: 23776392]
  7. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997 Feb;29(2):244-7 [PMID: 9044230]
  8. J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Aug;31(8):2189-2207 [PMID: 28731980]
  9. Age (Dordr). 2014;36(5):9715 [PMID: 25280550]
  10. Chin J Physiol. 2016 Oct 31;59(5):247-259 [PMID: 27604135]
  11. Asian J Sports Med. 2012 Dec;3(4):247-56 [PMID: 23342223]
  12. Clin Geriatr Med. 2017 Feb;33(1):17-26 [PMID: 27886695]
  13. Age (Dordr). 2012 Aug;34(4):1033-45 [PMID: 21796378]
  14. J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Feb;32(2):379-395 [PMID: 28225523]
  15. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013 May;68(5):605-11 [PMID: 23778421]
  16. Open Access J Sports Med. 2012 Oct 23;3:121-9 [PMID: 24198595]
  17. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2018 May;58(5):690-698 [PMID: 28462568]
  18. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001 Feb;86(2):724-31 [PMID: 11158037]
  19. Extrem Physiol Med. 2013 May 01;2(1):15 [PMID: 23848985]
  20. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016 Jan;26(1):17-28 [PMID: 25648250]
  21. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Sep;40(9):1681-6 [PMID: 18685521]
  22. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 29;16(13): [PMID: 31261850]
  23. JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Oct 5;1(6):e183605 [PMID: 30646252]
  24. Open Access J Sports Med. 2018 Mar 01;9:37-45 [PMID: 29535560]
  25. Age (Dordr). 2014 Apr;36(2):1003-8 [PMID: 24407890]
  26. Phys Sportsmed. 1996 Feb;24(2):72-6 [PMID: 20086971]
  27. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2012 Dec;7(4):310-2 [PMID: 23197583]
  28. J Sports Sci. 2014;32(4):354-66 [PMID: 24015856]
  29. J Strength Cond Res. 2020 May;34(5):1409-1415 [PMID: 32324710]
  30. J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 Jan-Feb;32(1):103-107 [PMID: 30610148]
  31. PLoS One. 2017 Feb 10;12(2):e0172121 [PMID: 28187185]
  32. Springerplus. 2016 May 20;5(1):672 [PMID: 27350909]
  33. Springerplus. 2016 May 17;5:645 [PMID: 27330911]
  34. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2005 Jun;4(3):165-70 [PMID: 15907270]
  35. Age (Dordr). 2016 Feb;38(1):18 [PMID: 26833033]
  36. Int J Sports Med. 2010 Apr;31(4):251-6 [PMID: 20166005]
  37. Can J Appl Physiol. 2004 Apr;29(2):139-45 [PMID: 15064423]
  38. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2016 Jun;7(3):290-8 [PMID: 27239410]
  39. Int J Hist Sport. 2010;27(11):1877-91 [PMID: 20684085]
  40. J Hum Kinet. 2017 Jun 22;57:199-211 [PMID: 28713472]

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Aging
Athletic Performance
Female
Humans
Male
Physical Endurance
Running
Sex Factors

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0ageracesperformanceultra-marathonsexwomenmen50-mile100-mile±hracedifferenceAgeolderdocumentedrunningUltra-Marathon2017ierecordsfinisherstimes163smallerpeakwell-knownfactorsinfluencingfactgroupsableachievesimilarswimmingknowledgestilllimitedaimstudyanalyzesex-specificaccordingdistanceonlinedatabaseGermanSociety196423198091665195310744539870analyzed11749512316926492747differencesdecreased441%913%overall33yearsdistancessummaryreducedadvancingrelativecomparedfindingsmightaidcoachesrunnerssetlong-termtraininggoalsconsideringWomenReducePerformanceDifferenceMenIncreasingRunningathleteultra-endurance

Similar Articles

Cited By