Smartphone-supported Positive Adjustment Coping Intervention (PACI) for couples undergoing fertility treatment: a randomised controlled trial protocol.

Maren Schick, Sabine Roesner, Ariane Germeyer, Markus Moessner, Stephanie Bauer, Beate Ditzen, Tewes Wischmann
Author Information
  1. Maren Schick: Institute of Medical Psychology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg, Germany.
  2. Sabine Roesner: Department of Gynecologic Endocrinology and Fertility Disorders, University Women's Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
  3. Ariane Germeyer: Department of Gynecologic Endocrinology and Fertility Disorders, University Women's Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
  4. Markus Moessner: Center for Psychotherapy Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg, Germany.
  5. Stephanie Bauer: Center for Psychotherapy Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg, Germany.
  6. Beate Ditzen: Institute of Medical Psychology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg, Germany.
  7. Tewes Wischmann: Institute of Medical Psychology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg, Germany.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Infertility generally counts as a profound crisis in the lives of couples and as an emotionally stressful experience. For couples undergoing fertility treatment, this is especially true of the waiting period following embryo transfer, which couples say is the most stressful period during treatment. However, at this specific phase, psychosocial counselling is not always available on the spot. The aim of this randomised controlled trial (RCT) study was to test the Positive Adjustment Coping Intervention (PACI), a low-dose, smartphone-supported psychological intervention for women and men undergoing fertility treatment.
METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The effectiveness of PACI is tested by means of a prospective two-arm RCT. During the 14-day waiting period between oocyte puncture/oocyte thawing and pregnancy test, participants are randomly assigned to one of the two groups, and both women and men receive daily text messages on their smartphones. One group receives text messages with statements reflecting positive-adjustment coping attitudes, the other group messages containing cognitive distractions. The primary outcome of this study is the reduction of psychosocial burden during the waiting period of reproductive treatment. Furthermore, we want to assess whether there are differences between the interventions in a pre-post assessment. The secondary outcomes are information on perceived effectiveness and practicability of the intervention one month after the waiting period.
ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained from the Ethics Committee of Heidelberg University Faculty of Medicine (S-074/2017). Study findings are planned for dissemination via peer-reviewed journal articles and at national and international conferences.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03118219; Pre-results.
PROTOCOL VERSION: Version 2.0 dated 18/02/2019.

Keywords

Associated Data

ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT03118219

References

  1. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2008 Jun;29(2):83-90 [PMID: 18484439]
  2. Psychol Health Med. 2010 Jan;15(1):26-33 [PMID: 20391222]
  3. Psychol Bull. 1996 Jan;119(1):138-48 [PMID: 8559858]
  4. J Psychosom Res. 2007 Jul;63(1):59-64 [PMID: 17586338]
  5. BMC Womens Health. 2013 Sep 03;13:35 [PMID: 24004640]
  6. Psychooncology. 2006 Feb;15(2):169-73 [PMID: 15929031]
  7. Fertil Steril. 2017 Jun;107(6):1370-1379.e5 [PMID: 28501369]
  8. Hum Reprod Update. 2009 May-Jun;15(3):279-95 [PMID: 19196795]
  9. Health Psychol. 2005 Mar;24(2):171-8 [PMID: 15755231]
  10. Hum Reprod. 2014 Feb;29(2):293-302 [PMID: 24287818]
  11. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2016 Apr 25;28(2):86-94 [PMID: 27605864]
  12. Hum Reprod. 2014 Jul;29(7):1459-70 [PMID: 24812317]
  13. Hum Reprod. 2016 May;31(5):1046-57 [PMID: 26965429]
  14. Hum Reprod. 2014 Dec;29(12):2712-8 [PMID: 25316451]
  15. Hum Reprod Update. 2014 Jul-Aug;20(4):594-613 [PMID: 24676468]
  16. Hum Reprod. 2015 Nov;30(11):2476-85 [PMID: 26345684]
  17. Womens Health (Lond). 2010 Jan;6(1):59-69 [PMID: 20088730]
  18. J Adv Nurs. 2005 Aug;51(3):217-26 [PMID: 16033589]
  19. J Behav Med. 2005 Apr;28(2):181-90 [PMID: 15957573]
  20. Appl Nurs Res. 2015 Nov;28(4):285-92 [PMID: 26608427]
  21. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2007 Apr;21(2):293-308 [PMID: 17241818]
  22. Hum Reprod. 2008 Oct;23(10):2299-307 [PMID: 18628259]
  23. BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 15;5(4):e007322 [PMID: 25877278]
  24. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2017 Jan;77(1):52-58 [PMID: 28190889]
  25. Fertil Steril. 2015 Aug;104(2):440-51.e7 [PMID: 26072382]
  26. Fertil Steril. 2010 Jul;94(2):574-80 [PMID: 19342027]
  27. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2009 Mar;12(1):14-20 [PMID: 19330608]
  28. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2014 Sep;27(5):320-5 [PMID: 25023887]
  29. Int J Eat Disord. 2017 Oct;50(10):1215-1221 [PMID: 28921689]
  30. BMJ. 2011 Feb 07;342:d40 [PMID: 21300711]
  31. Sociol Health Illn. 2010 Jan;32(1):140-62 [PMID: 20003036]
  32. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91 [PMID: 17695343]
  33. Int J Fertil Steril. 2018 Apr;12(1):13-18 [PMID: 29334201]
  34. Psychooncology. 2013 Apr;22(4):837-44 [PMID: 22473731]
  35. Int J Reprod Biomed (Yazd). 2017 Nov;15(11):687-696 [PMID: 29404530]
  36. Hum Reprod. 2010 May;25(5):1234-40 [PMID: 20228392]
  37. Andrologia. 2016 Nov;48(9):849-854 [PMID: 27739143]

MeSH Term

Adaptation, Psychological
Adolescent
Adult
Attitude
Couples Therapy
Female
Fertilization in Vitro
Germany
Humans
Infertility
Male
Patient Satisfaction
Pregnancy
Prospective Studies
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted
Smartphone
Social Support
Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic
Therapy, Computer-Assisted
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0periodwaitingcouplestreatmentinterventionundergoingfertilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialRCTPACImessagesstressfulembryotransferpsychosocialstudytestPositiveAdjustmentCopingInterventionsmartphone-supportedwomenmenANDeffectivenesstextgroupreproductiveINTRODUCTION:InfertilitygenerallycountsprofoundcrisislivesemotionallyexperienceespeciallytruefollowingsayHoweverspecificphasecounsellingalwaysavailablespotaimlow-dosepsychologicalMETHODSANALYSIS:testedmeansprospectivetwo-arm14-dayoocytepuncture/oocytethawingpregnancyparticipantsrandomlyassignedonetwogroupsreceivedailysmartphonesOnereceivesstatementsreflectingpositive-adjustmentcopingattitudescontainingcognitivedistractionsprimaryoutcomereductionburdenFurthermorewantassesswhetherdifferencesinterventionspre-postassessmentsecondaryoutcomesinformationperceivedpracticabilityone monthETHICSDISSEMINATION:EthicalapprovalobtainedEthicsCommitteeHeidelbergUniversityFacultyMedicineS-074/2017Studyfindingsplanneddisseminationviapeer-reviewedjournalarticlesnationalinternationalconferencesTRIALREGISTRATIONNUMBER:NCT03118219Pre-resultsPROTOCOLVERSION:Version20dated18/02/2019Smartphone-supportedtreatment:protocolassistedtechnologyonline

Similar Articles

Cited By