Improving adrenaline autoinjector adherence: A psychologically informed training for healthcare professionals.

Béré Mahoney, Elaine Walklet, Eleanor Bradley, Steve O'Hickey
Author Information
  1. Béré Mahoney: School of Psychology, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK. ORCID
  2. Elaine Walklet: School of Psychology, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK.
  3. Eleanor Bradley: School of Psychology, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK.
  4. Steve O'Hickey: School of Psychology, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinicians draw on instructional approaches when training patients with anaphylaxis to use adrenaline autoinjectors, but patient use is poor. Psychological barriers to these behaviours exist but are not considered routinely when training patients to use autoinjectors. Health Psychology principles suggest exploring these factors with patients could improve their autoinjector use.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a 90-minute workshop training clinicians in strategies and techniques for exploring and responding to psychological barriers to autoinjector use with patients. Attendees' knowledge, confidence and likelihood of using the strategies were expected to improve.
METHODS: Impact was evaluated using a longitudinal mixed-method design. Twenty-nine clinicians (general and specialist nurses, general practitioners, and pharmacists) supporting patients with anaphylaxis in UK hospitals and general practice attended. Self-rated knowledge, confidence, and likelihood of using the strategies taught were evaluated online 1 week before, 1 to 3, and 6 to 8 weeks after the workshop. Clinicians were invited for telephone interview after attending to explore qualitatively the workshop impact.
RESULTS: χ analyses were significant in most cases (P < .05), with sustained (6-8 weeks) improvements in knowledge, confidence, and likelihood of using the strategies taught. Thematic analysis of interview data showed the workshop enhanced attendees' knowledge of the care pathway, understanding of patient's experience of anaphylaxis as psychological not purely physical, and altered their communication with this and other patient groups. However, interviewees perceived lack of time and organisational factors as barriers to using the strategies and techniques taught in clinical contexts.
CONCLUSION: Training clinicians in psychologically informed strategies produce sustained improvements in their confidence and knowledge around patient autoinjector education, and their likelihood of using strategies in clinical practice.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Exploring psychological barriers should be part of training patients with anaphylaxis in autoinjector use.

Keywords

References

  1. Healthcare (Basel). 2015 Dec 04;3(4):1228-42 [PMID: 27417822]
  2. Allergy. 2010 Apr;65(4):435-44 [PMID: 20028373]
  3. Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Jun;101(6):1006-1035 [PMID: 29402571]
  4. J Paediatr Child Health. 2017 Oct;53(10):1029-1030 [PMID: 28975748]
  5. Intern Med J. 2017 Mar;47(3):256-261 [PMID: 28260260]
  6. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2011 Sep;22(6):590-3 [PMID: 21309857]
  7. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2007 Aug;18(5):448-52 [PMID: 17617813]
  8. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2017 Mar;7(3):276-286 [PMID: 27869359]
  9. Allergy. 2013 Nov;68(11):1353-61 [PMID: 24117770]
  10. Clin Exp Allergy. 1997 Aug;27(8):898-903 [PMID: 9291286]
  11. BMC Nurs. 2015 Jan 31;14:6 [PMID: 25663819]
  12. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Feb 08;16:44 [PMID: 26857701]
  13. Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Oct;101(10):1795-1803 [PMID: 29891103]
  14. Allergy. 2015 Jun;70(6):703-6 [PMID: 25676800]
  15. BMJ. 2007 Jul 7;335(7609):24-7 [PMID: 17615222]
  16. Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Mar;94(3):291-309 [PMID: 24305642]
  17. J Asthma Allergy. 2014 Oct 24;7:141-64 [PMID: 25368525]
  18. J Behav Med. 2014 Aug;37(4):607-20 [PMID: 23670643]
  19. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004 May;113(5):832-6 [PMID: 15131563]
  20. Patient Educ Couns. 1999 Sep;38(1):61-7 [PMID: 14528572]
  21. Scand J Caring Sci. 2013 Jun;27(2):335-44 [PMID: 22834703]
  22. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Feb;121(2 Suppl):S402-7; quiz S420 [PMID: 18241691]
  23. Allergy. 2014 Aug;69(8):1026-45 [PMID: 24909803]
  24. PLoS One. 2017 Nov 27;12(11):e0188822 [PMID: 29176800]
  25. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2017 May;28(3):238-244 [PMID: 27992679]
  26. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000 Dec;106(6):1184-9 [PMID: 11112904]
  27. J Health Psychol. 2018 Oct;23(12):1579-1589 [PMID: 27553607]
  28. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016 Apr;137(4):1128-1137.e1 [PMID: 26806049]
  29. Isr Med Assoc J. 2012 Jan;14(1):14-7 [PMID: 22624436]
  30. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Apr 09;15:32 [PMID: 25888346]
  31. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Aug;122(2):353-61, 361.e1-3 [PMID: 18572231]
  32. Ann Behav Med. 2013 Aug;46(1):81-95 [PMID: 23512568]
  33. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2014 Sep 19;10(1):49 [PMID: 25264449]
  34. World Allergy Organ J. 2015 Oct 28;8(1):32 [PMID: 26525001]
  35. Clin Transl Allergy. 2012 Feb 02;2(1):3 [PMID: 22409884]
  36. Nurs Open. 2015 Dec 17;3(3):125-139 [PMID: 27708823]
  37. Pediatrics. 2006 Jun;117(6):2149-57 [PMID: 16740859]
  38. BMJ. 2003 Jul 5;327(7405):33-5 [PMID: 12842955]
  39. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Sep 05;11:126 [PMID: 21888678]
  40. Br J Health Psychol. 2014 Feb;19(1):65-82 [PMID: 23398539]
  41. Clin Exp Allergy. 2012 Feb;42(2):284-92 [PMID: 22181034]
  42. Clin Exp Allergy. 2003 Aug;33(8):1015-8 [PMID: 12911771]
  43. Nurse Res. 2014 Jan;21(3):24-6 [PMID: 24460562]
  44. Annu Rev Public Health. 2010;31:399-418 [PMID: 20070207]
  45. Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):2465-76 [PMID: 24938120]
  46. Health Educ Behav. 1998 Oct;25(5):545-63 [PMID: 9768376]
  47. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017 Jan 13;12(1):8 [PMID: 28086972]
  48. Clin Exp Allergy. 2007 Jul;37(7):1090-4 [PMID: 17581204]
  49. Allergy. 2004 Feb;59(2):185-91 [PMID: 14763932]
  50. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2019 Spring;39(2):130-135 [PMID: 31045987]
  51. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018 Oct;18(5):382-386 [PMID: 30028728]
  52. Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 23;6:42 [PMID: 21513547]
  53. World J Clin Pediatr. 2017 Feb 8;6(1):60-68 [PMID: 28224097]
  54. World Allergy Organ J. 2014 May 30;7(1):9 [PMID: 24920969]
  55. Intern Emerg Med. 2015 Dec;10(8):937-41 [PMID: 25990486]
  56. Immun Inflamm Dis. 2019 Sep;7(3):214-228 [PMID: 31290265]
  57. Clin Exp Allergy. 2016 Dec;46(12):1621-1622 [PMID: 27893945]
  58. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2018 Apr 4;14:12 [PMID: 29632547]
  59. Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 24;7:37 [PMID: 22530986]
  60. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014 Dec;134(6):1318-1328.e7 [PMID: 25280385]
  61. BMC Res Notes. 2015 Nov 10;8:663 [PMID: 26555569]
  62. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 Apr;135(4):956-963.e1 [PMID: 25468198]

MeSH Term

Adult
Anaphylaxis
Education, Medical
Epinephrine
Female
General Practitioners
Health Personnel
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Nurse Clinicians
Pharmacists
Physicians
Self Administration
Surveys and Questionnaires
Vasoconstrictor Agents

Chemicals

Vasoconstrictor Agents
Epinephrine

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0strategiestrainingpatientsuseautoinjectorusinganaphylaxisknowledgepatientbarriersworkshopconfidencelikelihoodadrenalineclinicianspsychologicalgeneraltaughtCliniciansautoinjectorsexploringfactorsimproveimpacttechniquesevaluatedpractice1weeksinterviewsustainedimprovementsclinicalpsychologicallyinformedBACKGROUND:drawinstructionalapproachespoorPsychologicalbehavioursexistconsideredroutinelyHealthPsychologyprinciplessuggestOBJECTIVE:evaluate90-minuterespondingAttendees'expectedMETHODS:Impactlongitudinalmixed-methoddesignTwenty-ninespecialistnursespractitionerspharmacistssupportingUKhospitalsattendedSelf-ratedonlineweek368invitedtelephoneattendingexplorequalitativelyRESULTS:χanalysessignificantcasesP <056-8Thematicanalysisdatashowedenhancedattendees'carepathwayunderstandingpatient'sexperiencepurelyphysicalalteredcommunicationgroupsHoweverintervieweesperceivedlacktimeorganisationalcontextsCONCLUSION:TrainingproducearoundeducationCLINICALRELEVANCE:ExploringpartImprovingadherence:healthcareprofessionalsclinicianadherence

Similar Articles

Cited By