Cell-Based Therapies for Stroke: Are We There Yet?

Mirja Krause, Thanh G Phan, Henry Ma, Christopher G Sobey, Rebecca Lim
Author Information
  1. Mirja Krause: The Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  2. Thanh G Phan: Department of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  3. Henry Ma: Department of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  4. Christopher G Sobey: Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Microbiology, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  5. Rebecca Lim: The Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Abstract

Stroke is the second leading cause of death and physical disability, with a global lifetime incidence rate of 1 in 6. Currently, the only FDA approved treatment for ischemic stroke is the administration of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA). Stem cell clinical trials for stroke have been underway for close to two decades, with data suggesting that cell therapies are safe, feasible, and potentially efficacious. However, clinical trials for stroke account for <1% of all stem cell trials. Nevertheless, the resources devoted to clinical research to identify new treatments for stroke is still significant (53-64 million US$, Phase 1-4). Notably, a quarter of cell therapy clinical trials for stroke have been withdrawn (15.2%) or terminated (6.8%) to date. This review discusses the bottlenecks in delivering a successful cell therapy for stroke, and the cost-to-benefit ratio necessary to justify these expensive trials. Further, this review will critically assess the currently available data from completed stroke trials, the importance of standardization in outcome reporting, and the role of industry-led research in the development of cell therapies for stroke.

Keywords

References

  1. Neurology. 2000 Aug 22;55(4):565-9 [PMID: 10953194]
  2. J Neurol Sci. 2001 Aug 15;189(1-2):49-57 [PMID: 11535233]
  3. Stroke. 2002 May;33(5):1362-8 [PMID: 11988616]
  4. JAMA. 2003 Jan 22-29;289(4):454-65 [PMID: 12533125]
  5. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 May;111(6):1922-31 [PMID: 12711954]
  6. Brain Res. 2004 May 8;1007(1-2):1-9 [PMID: 15064130]
  7. Stroke. 2004 May;35(5):1209-15 [PMID: 15073405]
  8. J Insur Med. 2004;36(2):143-52 [PMID: 15301227]
  9. BMC Neurosci. 2004 Sep 15;5:33 [PMID: 15369599]
  10. NeuroRx. 2004 Oct;1(4):406-14 [PMID: 15717044]
  11. Stem Cells. 2005 Mar;23(3):383-91 [PMID: 15749933]
  12. Stem Cells. 2005 Mar;23(3):392-402 [PMID: 15749934]
  13. Ann Neurol. 2005 Jun;57(6):874-82 [PMID: 15929052]
  14. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2005;20(2):101-7 [PMID: 15976503]
  15. J Neurosurg. 2005 Jul;103(1):38-45 [PMID: 16121971]
  16. Neuroscience. 2006;137(2):393-9 [PMID: 16298076]
  17. Soc Sci Med. 1992 May;34(9):973-81 [PMID: 1631610]
  18. BMJ. 2006 May 6;332(7549):1061-4 [PMID: 16547014]
  19. Nature. 2006 Jun 29;441(7097):1094-6 [PMID: 16810245]
  20. Neurosurg Focus. 2008;24(3-4):E15 [PMID: 18341391]
  21. Stroke. 2009 Feb;40(2):510-5 [PMID: 19095993]
  22. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Nov;23(9):895-909 [PMID: 19633272]
  23. Stem Cells Dev. 2010 Jan;19(1):5-16 [PMID: 19951197]
  24. Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jun 1;152(11):726-32 [PMID: 20335313]
  25. Stem Cells. 2010 Jun;28(6):1099-106 [PMID: 20506226]
  26. Stroke. 2010 Oct;41(10):2254-8 [PMID: 20829513]
  27. Can Fam Physician. 1992 Feb;38:381-8 [PMID: 21221264]
  28. Stroke. 2011 Mar;42(3):825-9 [PMID: 21273569]
  29. Ann Neurol. 2011 Jul;70(1):59-69 [PMID: 21786299]
  30. Br Med Bull. 2011;100:137-55 [PMID: 21852279]
  31. J Neurol Sci. 2012 Feb 15;313(1-2):1-6 [PMID: 22047648]
  32. Stem Cells Dev. 2012 Jul 20;21(11):1838-51 [PMID: 22074360]
  33. Tex Heart Inst J. 2011;38(5):474-85 [PMID: 22163120]
  34. Stem Cells. 2012 Apr;30(4):785-96 [PMID: 22213183]
  35. Int J Stroke. 2012 Oct;7(7):582-8 [PMID: 22687044]
  36. Stroke. 2012 Aug;43(8):2242-4 [PMID: 22764211]
  37. Indian J Med Res. 2012 Aug;136(2):221-8 [PMID: 22960888]
  38. Cell Transplant. 2013;22(6):977-91 [PMID: 23031629]
  39. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46842 [PMID: 23056481]
  40. Cell Transplant. 2013;22(9):1541-52 [PMID: 23067568]
  41. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50444 [PMID: 23185625]
  42. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12:MR000033 [PMID: 23235689]
  43. Lancet. 2013 Jan 12;381(9861):91-2 [PMID: 23305999]
  44. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013 May;19(5):820-30 [PMID: 23416852]
  45. Int J Stroke. 2014 Apr;9(3):381-6 [PMID: 23692637]
  46. Trials. 2013 Oct 01;14:317 [PMID: 24083670]
  47. Stroke. 2014 Feb;45(2):634-9 [PMID: 24368562]
  48. Lancet. 2014 Jan 11;383(9912):166-75 [PMID: 24411645]
  49. Stroke. 2014 May;45(5):1545-88 [PMID: 24503673]
  50. J Comp Neurol. 2014 Sep 1;522(13):3120-37 [PMID: 24610730]
  51. Neuroradiology. 2014 Jun;56(6):467-76 [PMID: 24668181]
  52. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2014 Nov;3(11):1322-30 [PMID: 25107583]
  53. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014 Nov-Dec;23(10):2694-700 [PMID: 25304723]
  54. Stroke. 2014 Dec;45(12):3618-24 [PMID: 25378424]
  55. Int J Stem Cells. 2014 Nov;7(2):63-9 [PMID: 25473443]
  56. Cytotherapy. 2015 Jun;17(6):775-785 [PMID: 25800775]
  57. J Neurol Sci. 2015 May 15;352(1-2):1-11 [PMID: 25818674]
  58. BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 13;5(4):e006648 [PMID: 25869683]
  59. Int J Stroke. 2015 Oct;10(7):1149-52 [PMID: 26044701]
  60. Med Sci Monit. 2015 Jul 28;21:2190-5 [PMID: 26215395]
  61. Transl Stroke Res. 2015 Dec;6(6):421-9 [PMID: 26482176]
  62. J Clin Neurol. 2016 Jan;12(1):14-20 [PMID: 26610894]
  63. Lancet Neurol. 2016 Feb;15(2):219-230 [PMID: 26704439]
  64. Clin Trials. 2016 Apr;13(2):117-26 [PMID: 26908540]
  65. Neural Regen Res. 2016 Feb;11(2):298-304 [PMID: 27073384]
  66. Perspect Clin Res. 2016 Apr-Jun;7(2):62-7 [PMID: 27141471]
  67. Stroke. 2016 Jul;47(7):1817-24 [PMID: 27256670]
  68. Transl Stroke Res. 2016 Oct;7(5):378-87 [PMID: 27384771]
  69. Lancet. 2016 Aug 20;388(10046):787-96 [PMID: 27497862]
  70. Lancet. 2016 Aug 20;388(10046):736-8 [PMID: 27497863]
  71. Transl Stroke Res. 2016 Dec;7(6):452-457 [PMID: 27515852]
  72. Regen Med. 2016 Oct;11(7):725-41 [PMID: 27580670]
  73. Cell Stem Cell. 2016 Sep 1;19(3):293-7 [PMID: 27588746]
  74. J Stroke. 2016 Sep;18(3):256-266 [PMID: 27733032]
  75. Mol Ther. 2016 Oct;24(10):1710-1711 [PMID: 27818493]
  76. Front Neurol. 2016 Dec 16;7:228 [PMID: 28018286]
  77. Transl Stroke Res. 2017 Apr;8(2):93-103 [PMID: 28127687]
  78. Lancet Neurol. 2017 May;16(5):360-368 [PMID: 28320635]
  79. Stem Cell Reports. 2017 May 9;8(5):1190-1201 [PMID: 28416287]
  80. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2017 Aug 30;8(1):191 [PMID: 28854961]
  81. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2017 May 22;2(2):59-64 [PMID: 28959493]
  82. BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 5;7(10):e015997 [PMID: 28982811]
  83. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 4;378(1):11-21 [PMID: 29129157]
  84. Int J Stroke. 2018 Jun;13(4):444-448 [PMID: 29134924]
  85. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Feb;55(2):257-265 [PMID: 29208350]
  86. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2018 Jan 25;18(1):1 [PMID: 29372464]
  87. Stroke. 2018 Mar;49(3):700-709 [PMID: 29382802]
  88. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2018 Jul;7(7):521-529 [PMID: 29752869]
  89. N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 16;379(7):611-622 [PMID: 29766770]
  90. Cell Stem Cell. 2018 Jun 01;22(6):824-833 [PMID: 29859173]
  91. Front Neurol. 2018 Jun 07;9:198 [PMID: 29930530]
  92. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018 Mar 20;59(4):AMD78-AMD82 [PMID: 30025109]
  93. Neural Regen Res. 2018 Jul;13(7):1294-1304 [PMID: 30028342]
  94. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018 Aug 24;9(1):228 [PMID: 30143053]
  95. Intensive Care Med. 2018 Oct;44(10):1613-1627 [PMID: 30151688]
  96. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2019 Jan;8(1):14-21 [PMID: 30156755]
  97. J Neurosurg. 2018 Nov 1;:1-11 [PMID: 30497166]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0strokecellclinicaltrialstherapy6datatherapiesstemresearchreviewtrialStrokesecondleadingcausedeathphysicaldisabilitygloballifetimeincidencerate1CurrentlyFDAapprovedtreatmentischemicadministrationtissueplasminogenactivatortPAStemunderwayclosetwodecadessuggestingsafefeasiblepotentiallyefficaciousHoweveraccount<1%Neverthelessresourcesdevotedidentifynewtreatmentsstillsignificant53-64millionUS$Phase1-4Notablyquarterwithdrawn152%terminated8%datediscussesbottlenecksdeliveringsuccessfulcost-to-benefitrationecessaryjustifyexpensivewillcriticallyassesscurrentlyavailablecompletedimportancestandardizationoutcomereportingroleindustry-leddevelopmentCell-BasedTherapiesStroke:Yet?cellcostscells

Similar Articles

Cited By