Acellular Dermal Matrix Reduces Myofibroblast Presence in the Breast Capsule.

Ruth Tevlin, Mimi R Borrelli, Dre Irizarry, Dung Nguyen, Derrick C Wan, Arash Momeni
Author Information
  1. Ruth Tevlin: Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, Calif.
  2. Mimi R Borrelli: Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, Calif.
  3. Dre Irizarry: Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, Calif.
  4. Dung Nguyen: Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, Calif.
  5. Derrick C Wan: Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, Calif.
  6. Arash Momeni: Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, Calif.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Capsular contracture remains a common complication after implant-based breast reconstruction. Previous work has suggested that the use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) reduces the rate of capsular contracture, though little is understood about the underlying mechanism. As myofibroblasts are believed to be the key cells implicated in contracture formation, we hypothesized that ADM would result in a reduction in periprosthetic myofibroblast concentration.
METHODS: Five patients who underwent immediate prepectoral tissue expander placement with anterior ADM coverage and an inferior cuff were included. At the second stage, tissue samples were obtained of both ADM and capsule from each reconstructed breast. Samples were then prepared for hematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistochemistry for myofibroblast identification (alpha smooth muscle actin and vimentin positive and desmin negative) and analysis. Experimental values are presented as mean ± SD unless otherwise stated. Statistical significance was determined using unpaired test.
RESULTS: Successful incorporation of ADM was noted in all cases. A significant reduction in myofibroblast concentration was noted in the ADM versus the capsule ( = 0.0018). This was paralleled by significantly thicker periprosthetic capsule formation overlying the formerly raw pectoralis major muscle, that is, not covered by ADM ( < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: In the presence of ADM, there are significantly fewer myofibroblasts in breast capsules and thinner capsules on histology. Given the central role of myofibroblasts in the development of clinically significant capsular contracture, this study unmasks a possible mechanism for the protective effect of ADM with respect to capsular contracture development.

References

  1. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Apr;127(4):1417-1424 [PMID: 21460649]
  2. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 May 18;6(5):e1744 [PMID: 29922548]
  3. Br J Plast Surg. 1997 Apr;50(3):166-71 [PMID: 9176002]
  4. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 May;141(5):1077-1084 [PMID: 29697602]
  5. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Mar;127(3):1047-1058 [PMID: 21088648]
  6. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Aug;25(8):2279-2287 [PMID: 29855829]
  7. Arch Plast Surg. 2015 Sep;42(5):532-43 [PMID: 26430623]
  8. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Aug;142(2):232e-233e [PMID: 29889730]
  9. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Mar;137(3):826-841 [PMID: 26910663]
  10. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008 May;32(3):418-25 [PMID: 18338102]
  11. Gland Surg. 2016 Apr;5(2):158-73 [PMID: 27047784]
  12. Int Wound J. 2017 Apr;14(2):414-419 [PMID: 27524677]
  13. Clin Plast Surg. 2012 Apr;39(2):127-136 [PMID: 22482354]
  14. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Apr 20;6(4):e1731 [PMID: 29876176]
  15. Gland Surg. 2017 Feb;6(1):49-56 [PMID: 28210552]
  16. Ann Plast Surg. 2005 Sep;55(3):232-9 [PMID: 16106158]
  17. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015 Feb;68(2):162-7 [PMID: 25455288]
  18. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2018;70(2):191-200 [PMID: 29710686]
  19. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018 Aug;42(4):1133-1143 [PMID: 29564486]
  20. Chest. 2012 Jul;142(1):200-207 [PMID: 22796840]
  21. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979 Apr;63(4):473-80 [PMID: 370851]
  22. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Apr 4;6(4):e1712 [PMID: 29876165]
  23. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Nov;128(5):403e-410e [PMID: 22030500]
  24. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Sep;132(3):519-529 [PMID: 23985627]
  25. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Dec;140(6S Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction):31S-38S [PMID: 29166345]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0ADMcontracturebreastcapsularmyofibroblastsmyofibroblastcapsulemechanismformationreductionperiprostheticconcentrationtissuemusclenotedsignificant0significantlycapsulesdevelopmentBACKGROUND:Capsularremainscommoncomplicationimplant-basedreconstructionPreviousworksuggesteduseacellulardermalmatrixreducesratethoughlittleunderstoodunderlyingbelievedkeycellsimplicatedhypothesizedresultMETHODS:FivepatientsunderwentimmediateprepectoralexpanderplacementanteriorcoverageinferiorcuffincludedsecondstagesamplesobtainedreconstructedSamplespreparedhematoxylineosinstainingimmunohistochemistryidentificationalphasmoothactinvimentinpositivedesminnegativeanalysisExperimentalvaluespresentedmean±SDunlessotherwisestatedStatisticalsignificancedeterminedusingunpairedtestRESULTS:Successfulincorporationcasesversus=0018paralleledthickeroverlyingformerlyrawpectoralismajorcovered<0001CONCLUSIONS:presencefewerthinnerhistologyGivencentralroleclinicallystudyunmaskspossibleprotectiveeffectrespectAcellularDermalMatrixReducesMyofibroblastPresenceBreastCapsule

Similar Articles

Cited By