Tuning HS Release by Controlling Mobility in a Micelle Core.

Jeffrey C Foster, Ryan J Carrazzone, Nathan J Spear, Scott C Radzinski, Kyle J Arrington, John B Matson
Author Information
  1. Jeffrey C Foster: Department of Chemistry, Center for Drug Discovery, and Macromolecules Innovation Institute, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, United States. ORCID
  2. Ryan J Carrazzone: Department of Chemistry, Center for Drug Discovery, and Macromolecules Innovation Institute, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, United States.
  3. Nathan J Spear: Department of Chemistry, Center for Drug Discovery, and Macromolecules Innovation Institute, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, United States.
  4. Scott C Radzinski: Department of Chemistry, Center for Drug Discovery, and Macromolecules Innovation Institute, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, United States.
  5. Kyle J Arrington: Department of Chemistry, Center for Drug Discovery, and Macromolecules Innovation Institute, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, United States.
  6. John B Matson: Department of Chemistry, Center for Drug Discovery, and Macromolecules Innovation Institute, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, United States. ORCID

Abstract

Drug delivery from polymer micelles has been widely studied, but methods to precisely tune rates of drug release from micelles are limited. Here, the mobility of hydrophobic micelle cores was varied to tune the rate at which a covalently bound drug was released. This concept was applied to cysteine-triggered release of hydrogen sulfide (HS), a signaling gas with therapeutic potential. In this system, thiol-triggered HS donor molecules were covalently linked to the hydrophobic blocks of self-assembled polymer amphiphiles. Because release of HS is triggered by cysteine, diffusion of cysteine into the hydrophobic micelle core was hypothesized to control the rate of release. We confirmed this hypothesis by carrying out release experiments from HS-releasing micelles in varying compositions of EtOH/HO. Higher EtOH concentrations caused the micelles to swell, facilitating diffusion in and out of their hydrophobic cores and leading to faster HS release from the micelles. To achieve a similar effect without addition of organic solvent, we prepared micelles with varying core mobility via incorporation of a plasticizing co-monomer in the core-forming block. The glass transition temperature (T) of the core block could therefore be precisely varied by changing the amount of the plasticizing co-monomer in the polymer. In aqueous solution under identical conditions, the release rate of HS varied over 20-fold (t = 0.18 - 4.2 h), with the lowest T hydrophobic block resulting in the fastest HS release. This method of modulating release kinetics from polymer micelles by tuning core mobility may be applicable to many types of physically encapsulated and covalently linked small molecules in a variety of drug delivery systems.

References

  1. Mol Pharm. 2017 Apr 3;14(4):1300-1306 [PMID: 28300411]
  2. J Am Chem Soc. 2013 Feb 27;135(8):2907-10 [PMID: 23379791]
  3. Org Lett. 2014 Mar 21;16(6):1558-61 [PMID: 24575729]
  4. Science. 2004 Mar 19;303(5665):1818-22 [PMID: 15031496]
  5. Physiol Rev. 2012 Apr;92(2):791-896 [PMID: 22535897]
  6. Biomacromolecules. 2017 Apr 10;18(4):1434-1439 [PMID: 28263572]
  7. J Mater Chem B. 2018 Nov 28;6(44):7122-7128 [PMID: 32254628]
  8. Nat Chem. 2018 Jun;10(6):659-666 [PMID: 29713034]
  9. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2002 Feb 21;54(2):203-22 [PMID: 11897146]
  10. J Am Chem Soc. 2011 Jan 12;133(1):15-7 [PMID: 21142018]
  11. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2001 Mar 23;47(1):113-31 [PMID: 11251249]
  12. J Control Release. 2014 Sep 28;190:31-2 [PMID: 25356469]
  13. Nat Nanotechnol. 2007 Dec;2(12):751-60 [PMID: 18654426]
  14. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2009;48(29):5309-12 [PMID: 19294716]
  15. Biomacromolecules. 2011 Aug 8;12(8):3015-22 [PMID: 21657209]
  16. Med Res Rev. 2018 Jan;38(1):57-100 [PMID: 28240384]
  17. ACS Macro Lett. 2016 Sep 20;5(9):1044-1048 [PMID: 35614643]
  18. Biochem Pharmacol. 2018 Mar;149:110-123 [PMID: 29175421]
  19. Macromolecules. 2016 Jan 26;49(2):653-662 [PMID: 27065494]
  20. Cancer Res. 2003 Dec 15;63(24):8977-83 [PMID: 14695216]
  21. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003 May;2(5):347-60 [PMID: 12750738]
  22. Chem Commun (Camb). 2015 Aug 25;51(66):13131-4 [PMID: 26189449]
  23. J Am Chem Soc. 2008 May 28;130(21):6731-3 [PMID: 18452296]
  24. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2001 Dec 3;53(1):95-108 [PMID: 11733119]
  25. J Am Chem Soc. 2013 Jun 26;135(25):9518-24 [PMID: 23763310]
  26. Org Biomol Chem. 2005 Aug 21;3(16):2917-20 [PMID: 16186921]

Grants

  1. R01 GM123508/NIGMS NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0releasemicellesHShydrophobicpolymercoredrugmobilityvariedratecovalentlyblockdeliverypreciselytunemicellecoresmoleculeslinkedcysteinediffusionvaryingplasticizingco-monomerTDrugwidelystudiedmethodsrateslimitedboundreleasedconceptappliedcysteine-triggeredhydrogensulfidesignalinggastherapeuticpotentialsystemthiol-triggereddonorblocksself-assembledamphiphilestriggeredhypothesizedcontrolconfirmedhypothesiscarryingexperimentsHS-releasingcompositionsEtOH/HOHigherEtOHconcentrationscausedswellfacilitatingleadingfasterachievesimilareffectwithoutadditionorganicsolventpreparedviaincorporationcore-formingglasstransitiontemperaturethereforechangingamountaqueoussolutionidenticalconditions20-foldt=018-42hlowestresultingfastestmethodmodulatingkineticstuningmayapplicablemanytypesphysicallyencapsulatedsmallvarietysystemsTuningReleaseControllingMobilityMicelleCore

Similar Articles

Cited By