Effects of Acute Tryptophan Depletion on Repetitive Behavior in Laying Hens.

Patrick Birkl, Jacqueline Chow, Peter McBride, Joergen B Kjaer, Wolfgang Kunze, Paul Forsythe, Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek
Author Information
  1. Patrick Birkl: Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
  2. Jacqueline Chow: Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
  3. Peter McBride: Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
  4. Joergen B Kjaer: Friedrich-Loeffler-Institute, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Institute of Animal Welfare and Animal Husbandry, Celle, Germany.
  5. Wolfgang Kunze: Department of Medicine, Brain-Body Institute and Firestone Institute for Respiratory Health, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
  6. Paul Forsythe: Department of Medicine, Brain-Body Institute and Firestone Institute for Respiratory Health, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
  7. Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek: Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.

Abstract

Repetitive pecking at the feather cover of other birds (FP) is one of the most important welfare problems in domestic birds. It is not only characterized by motor symptoms, but also by an innate vulnerability of the serotonergic system. Moreover, the serotonergic system influences cognitive function. Acute Tryptophan depletion (ATD) is a widely used method for studying serotonergic function in mammals and has been recently validated in birds. However, a Tryptophan-deficient amino acid mixture has never been tested on groups of birds to impact their social behavior, including repetitive feather pecking, nor has it been given to potentially impact their cognition and motor performance. One hundred and sixty White Leghorn laying hens consisting of two genetic lines divergently selected to perform high (H) or low (L) levels of FP, and an unselected control line (UC), were kept in 10 groups consisting of 4 H, 3 L, and 9 UC genotypes. In a counterbalanced order, half of the groups were first subjected to an ATD treatment, while the other half were first given a balanced control (BC) treatment, and vice versa, after which their feather pecking behavior was observed. The effect of ATD/BC on repetitive pecking, motor performance, and cognition was investigated in a 5-s delayed reward task in an operant chamber with 10 phenotypic feather peckers, 10 recipients of feather pecking, and 10 bystanders (who neither performed nor received feather pecks). ATD given to groups of birds induced gentle, repetitive feather pecking in all genotypes. Following ATD, phenotypic feather peckers performed more poorly during the delayed reward task, as seen by their higher number of repetitive, non-rewarded key, and non-key pecks in the operant chamber. In conclusion, ATD impacted the hens' social behavior by increasing the number of repetitive gentle feather pecks at conspecifics. Furthermore, feather peckers were more likely to peck while waiting for a reward after ATD, suggesting a role for the serotonergic system on cognition in these birds.

Keywords

References

  1. Br Poult Sci. 1998 Dec;39 Suppl:S17-8 [PMID: 10188023]
  2. Br Poult Sci. 1999 Dec;40(5):579-84 [PMID: 10670667]
  3. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000 Jun;71(6):1536-44 [PMID: 10837296]
  4. Anim Behav. 2000 Aug;60(2):211-216 [PMID: 10973723]
  5. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2001 Mar 2;71(3):229-239 [PMID: 11230903]
  6. Physiol Behav. 2002 Apr 15;75(5):653-9 [PMID: 12020730]
  7. Mol Psychiatry. 2003 Nov;8(12):951-73 [PMID: 14647394]
  8. Behav Neurosci. 2004 Jun;118(3):575-83 [PMID: 15174935]
  9. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2005 Jul;39(7):558-64 [PMID: 15996136]
  10. Poult Sci. 2006 Jan;85(1):21-5 [PMID: 16493941]
  11. J Neural Transm Gen Sect. 1990;79(1-2):25-34 [PMID: 1688706]
  12. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2007 Aug;10(4):449-61 [PMID: 16893493]
  13. Behav Brain Res. 2007 Jan 10;176(1):66-74 [PMID: 16997392]
  14. Behav Genet. 2009 Sep;39(5):564-70 [PMID: 19526353]
  15. Br J Psychiatry. 2009 Aug;195(2):102-8 [PMID: 19648538]
  16. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2009 Jun;7(2):150-7 [PMID: 19949574]
  17. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011 Jan;35(3):356-65 [PMID: 20153769]
  18. Behav Genet. 2010 Sep;40(5):715-27 [PMID: 20496162]
  19. Mol Psychiatry. 2011 Jul;16(7):695-713 [PMID: 21339754]
  20. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Feb 25;368(1615):20110375 [PMID: 23440461]
  21. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1989;98(4):508-11 [PMID: 2505291]
  22. Behav Brain Res. 2017 Jun 1;327:11-20 [PMID: 28347825]
  23. Poult Sci. 2017 Sep 1;96(9):3021-3025 [PMID: 28641389]
  24. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 Dec;95:170-188 [PMID: 30055196]
  25. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1986 Jul;25(1):1-6 [PMID: 3749215]
  26. Behaviour. 1974;49(3):227-67 [PMID: 4597405]
  27. J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 Mar;69(2):103-22 [PMID: 9540229]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0featherpeckingbirdsATDrepetitiveserotonergicgroupscognition10motorsystembehaviorgivenrewardoperantchamberpeckerspecksRepetitiveFPdomesticfunctionAcuteimpactsocialperformanceconsistingHLcontrolUCgenotypeshalffirsttreatmentdelayedtaskphenotypicperformedgentlenumbercoveroneimportantwelfareproblemscharacterizedsymptomsalsoinnatevulnerabilityMoreoverinfluencescognitivetryptophandepletionwidelyusedmethodstudyingmammalsrecentlyvalidatedHowevertryptophan-deficientaminoacidmixturenevertestedincludingpotentiallyOnehundredsixtyWhiteLeghornlayinghenstwogeneticlinesdivergentlyselectedperformhighlowlevelsunselectedlinekept439counterbalancedordersubjectedbalancedBCviceversaobservedeffectATD/BCinvestigated5-srecipientsbystandersneitherreceivedinducedFollowingpoorlyseenhighernon-rewardedkeynon-keyconclusionimpactedhens'increasingconspecificsFurthermorelikelypeckwaitingsuggestingroleEffectsTryptophanDepletionBehaviorLayingHens

Similar Articles

Cited By (4)