Fine Sediment Removal Influences Biogeochemical Processes in a Gravel-bottomed Stream.

Joseph A Morgan, Todd V Royer, Jeffrey R White
Author Information
  1. Joseph A Morgan: School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington, 702N. Walnut Grove Ave, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA. morgan.joseph@epa.gov. ORCID
  2. Todd V Royer: School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington, 702N. Walnut Grove Ave, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA. ORCID
  3. Jeffrey R White: School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington, 702N. Walnut Grove Ave, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA. ORCID

Abstract

The transport and processing of nutrients and organic matter in streams are important functions that influence the condition of watersheds and downstream ecosystems. In this study, we investigated the effects of streambed sediment removal on biogeochemical cycling in Fawn River, a gravel-bottomed river in Indiana, U.S.A. We measured stream metabolism as well as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) retention in both restored and unrestored reaches of Fawn River to examine how sediment removal affected multiple biogeochemical functions at the reach scale. We also assessed the properties of restored and unrestored streambed sediments to elucidate potential mechanisms driving observed reach-scale differences. We found that sediment removal led to lower rates of primary productivity and ecosystem respiration in the restored reach, likely due to macrophyte removal and potentially due to changes to sediment organic matter quality. We found minimal differences in N and P retention, suggesting that these processes are controlled at larger spatial or temporal scales than were examined in this study. Denitrification enzyme activity was lower in sediments from the restored reach compared to the unrestored reach, suggesting that restoration may have decreased N removal. Our results indicate that most near-term changes in biogeochemical function following restoration could be attributed to macrophyte removal, although effects from sediment removal may emerge over longer timescales.

Keywords

References

  1. J Environ Qual. 2004 Jul-Aug;33(4):1296-304 [PMID: 15254111]
  2. Science. 2005 Apr 29;308(5722):636-7 [PMID: 15860611]
  3. Environ Sci Technol. 2007 Mar 1;41(5):1570-6 [PMID: 17396643]
  4. Nature. 2008 Mar 13;452(7184):202-5 [PMID: 18337819]
  5. Ecology. 2008 Oct;89(10):2935-45 [PMID: 18959330]
  6. Ecol Appl. 2011 Sep;21(6):1926-31 [PMID: 21939034]
  7. J Environ Qual. 2013 Sep;42(5):1308-26 [PMID: 24216410]
  8. Sci Total Environ. 2017 Feb 1;579:1815-1821 [PMID: 27932213]

Grants

  1. EPA999999/Intramural EPA

MeSH Term

Ecosystem
Geologic Sediments
Indiana
Nitrogen
Phosphorus
Rivers

Chemicals

Phosphorus
Nitrogen

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0removalsedimentrestoredreachbiogeochemicalFawnRiverNretentionunrestoredrestorationorganicmatterfunctionsstudyeffectsstreambedmetabolismPsedimentsdifferencesfoundlowerduemacrophytechangessuggestingmayFineStreamtransportprocessingnutrientsstreamsimportantinfluenceconditionwatershedsdownstreamecosystemsinvestigatedcyclinggravel-bottomedriverIndianaUSAmeasuredstreamwellnitrogenphosphorusreachesexamineaffectedmultiplescalealsoassessedpropertieselucidatepotentialmechanismsdrivingobservedreach-scaleledratesprimaryproductivityecosystemrespirationlikelypotentiallyqualityminimalprocessescontrolledlargerspatialtemporalscalesexaminedDenitrificationenzymeactivitycompareddecreasedresultsindicatenear-termfunctionfollowingattributedalthoughemergelongertimescalesSedimentRemovalInfluencesBiogeochemicalProcessesGravel-bottomedEcosystemMacrophyteNutrient

Similar Articles

Cited By