Patient-reported outcomes as predictors of survival in patients with bowel cancer: a systematic review.

Claudia Rutherford, Rachel Campbell, Kate White, Madeleine King
Author Information
  1. Claudia Rutherford: Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Quality of Life Office, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. claudia.rutherford@sydney.edu.au. ORCID
  2. Rachel Campbell: Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Quality of Life Office, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  3. Kate White: Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Cancer Nursing Research Unit (CNRU), The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
  4. Madeleine King: Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Quality of Life Office, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The prognostic value of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) has been determined in some cancers, but a focussed review in colorectal cancer (CRC) has not yet been conducted. We systematically reviewed PRO predictors of CRC patient survival.
METHODS: We searched four electronic databases (from inception to May 2018), reference lists and professional organisations to identify studies reporting pre-treatment PRO predictors of overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) in CRC identified through univariate or multivariate models. Two reviewers independently applied inclusion criteria and extracted data on study characteristics, median and 1-year survival rates, PROs assessed and model results.
RESULTS: In 25 of 27 studies (n = 12,544), at least one PRO was significantly associated with survival. Physical functioning, fatigue, pain and appetite loss predicted OS more often than other PROs in metastatic disease (19/27 studies). One study explored PRO predictors in early-stage CRC, finding emotional well-being and mood predicted OS. In mixed-stage samples (7/27 studies), physical functioning predicted OS more often than other PROs. Few studies modelled PFS, for which few PROs had predictive value.
CONCLUSIONS: Physical and psychological functioning, pain, fatigue and appetite loss had prognostic significance above and beyond clinical predictors in CRC. Routine monitoring of these PROs may allow earlier detection and amelioration of problems, which may improve quality of life and perhaps extend survival. More research is needed to determine prognostic value of PROs in early-stage CRC, and prognostic significance of changes in PRO scores.

Keywords

References

  1. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Oct 10;31(29):3711-8 [PMID: 24019549]
  2. Cancer. 2014 Jan 15;120(2):302-11 [PMID: 24127333]
  3. Eur J Cancer. 2017 Mar;74:98-108 [PMID: 27825697]
  4. Qual Life Res. 2000;9(8):887-900 [PMID: 11284208]
  5. J Clin Oncol. 1994 Mar;12(3):608-16 [PMID: 8120561]
  6. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2015 Dec;6(6):605-12 [PMID: 26697191]
  7. Pharmacotherapy. 1995 Sep-Oct;15(5):600-7 [PMID: 8570432]
  8. Eur J Cancer. 2006 Jan;42(1):42-9 [PMID: 16298522]
  9. Med Clin (Barc). 2017 Apr 21;148(8):345-350 [PMID: 28073517]
  10. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 May 13;12:69 [PMID: 24886671]
  11. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr 20;26(12):2020-6 [PMID: 18421055]
  12. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Mar 10;26(8):1355-63 [PMID: 18227528]
  13. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Apr;18(4):989-96 [PMID: 21132391]
  14. Br J Surg. 2001 Dec;88(12):1617-22 [PMID: 11736975]
  15. Cancer. 2009 Dec 15;115(24):5798-806 [PMID: 19937953]
  16. Cancer. 2017 May 15;123(10):1839-1847 [PMID: 28081292]
  17. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011 Aug 03;9:62 [PMID: 21812962]
  18. J Geriatr Oncol. 2014 Oct 1;5(4):368-75 [PMID: 25002322]
  19. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Dec 28;108(5):null [PMID: 26714759]
  20. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 May 6;67(3):177-193 [PMID: 28248415]
  21. Stat Med. 2002 Dec 30;21(24):3865-84 [PMID: 12483772]
  22. J Clin Oncol. 1996 Jan;14(1):171-5 [PMID: 8558193]
  23. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Jun 11;13:211 [PMID: 23758898]
  24. Eur J Cancer. 2010 Nov;46(16):2879-88 [PMID: 20605090]
  25. J Cancer Surviv. 2018 Dec;12(6):733-743 [PMID: 30191524]
  26. J R Soc Med. 1998 Aug;91(8):408-13 [PMID: 9816354]
  27. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009 Dec 23;7:102 [PMID: 20030832]
  28. Acta Oncol. 2010;49(1):50-6 [PMID: 20100144]
  29. Eur J Cancer. 2016 Oct;66:138-43 [PMID: 27573427]
  30. Qual Life Res. 2019 May;28(5):1315-1325 [PMID: 30659449]
  31. Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Mar 1;11(5):1757-64 [PMID: 15755997]
  32. Int J Surg Oncol. 2013;2013:269510 [PMID: 24369498]
  33. Dig Liver Dis. 2016 Jan;48(1):87-93 [PMID: 26493627]
  34. Clin Cancer Res. 2000 Aug;6(8):3038-45 [PMID: 10955782]
  35. J Clin Med. 2018 Jan 30;7(2):null [PMID: 29385768]
  36. BMC Cancer. 2014 May 17;14:337 [PMID: 24886385]
  37. Sleep Med. 2015 Mar;16(3):391-8 [PMID: 25678361]
  38. Qual Life Res. 2017 Feb;26(2):319-330 [PMID: 27492454]

MeSH Term

Colorectal Neoplasms
Female
Humans
Male
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Prognosis
Quality of Life

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0PROssurvivalCRCPROpredictorsstudiesprognosticOSvalueoutcomesreviewfunctioningpredictedcancerPFSstudyPhysicalfatiguepainappetitelossoftenearly-stagesignificancemayPatient-reportedINTRODUCTION:patient-reporteddeterminedcancersfocussedcolorectalyetconductedsystematicallyreviewedpatientMETHODS:searchedfourelectronicdatabasesinceptionMay2018referencelistsprofessionalorganisationsidentifyreportingpre-treatmentoverallprogression-freeidentifiedunivariatemultivariatemodelsTworeviewersindependentlyappliedinclusioncriteriaextracteddatacharacteristicsmedian1-yearratesassessedmodelresultsRESULTS:2527n = 12544leastonesignificantlyassociatedmetastaticdisease19/27Oneexploredfindingemotionalwell-beingmoodmixed-stagesamples7/27physicalmodelledpredictiveCONCLUSIONS:psychologicalbeyondclinicalRoutinemonitoringallowearlierdetectionameliorationproblemsimprovequalitylifeperhapsextendresearchneededdeterminechangesscorespatientsbowelcancer:systematicBowelPredictorsSurvivalSystematic

Similar Articles

Cited By