Screen Recordings as a Tool to Document Computer Assisted Data Collection Procedures.

Tobias Heycke, Lisa Spitzer
Author Information
  1. Tobias Heycke: GESIS - Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences, DE. ORCID
  2. Lisa Spitzer: University of Cologne, DE.

Abstract

Recently in psychological science and many related fields, a surprisingly large amount of experiments could not be replicated by independent researchers. A non-replication could indicate that a previous finding might have been a false positive statistical result and the effect does not exist. However, it could also mean that a specific detail of the experimental procedure is essential for the effect to emerge, which might not have been included in the replication attempt. Therefore any replication attempt that does not replicate the original effect is most informative when the original procedure is closely adhered to. One proposed solution to facilitate the empirical reproducibility of the experimental procedures in psychology is to upload the experimental script and materials to a public repository. However, we believe that merely providing the materials of an experimental procedure is not sufficient, as many software solutions are not freely available, software solutions might change, and it is time consuming to set up the procedure. We argue that there is a simple solution to these problems when an experiment is conducted using computers: recording an example procedure with a screen capture software and providing the video in an online repository. We therefore provide a brief tutorial on screen recordings using an open source screen recording software. With this information, individual researchers should be able to record their experimental procedures and we hope to facilitate the use of screen recordings in computer assisted data collection procedures.

Keywords

References

  1. Psychol Sci. 2011 Nov;22(11):1359-66 [PMID: 22006061]
  2. Nature. 2014 Nov 6;515(7525):9 [PMID: 25373639]
  3. Front Psychol. 2015 May 19;6:621 [PMID: 26042061]
  4. Science. 2015 Jun 26;348(6242):1422-5 [PMID: 26113702]
  5. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2014 Sep;9(5):556-78 [PMID: 26186758]
  6. Science. 2015 Aug 28;349(6251):aac4716 [PMID: 26315443]
  7. Science. 2016 Mar 25;351(6280):1433-6 [PMID: 26940865]
  8. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 Jul;11(4):546-73 [PMID: 27474142]
  9. PLoS One. 2016 Nov 10;11(11):e0166387 [PMID: 27832157]
  10. Psychol Sci. 2017 Jun;28(6):699-702 [PMID: 28414920]
  11. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018 Feb 1;13(2):127-134 [PMID: 28787228]
  12. Scientometrics. 2017;113(1):633-650 [PMID: 29056794]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0experimentalprocedurescreensoftwaremighteffectreplicationproceduresrecordingmanyresearchersHoweverattemptoriginalsolutionfacilitatereproducibilitymaterialsrepositoryprovidingsolutionsusingrecordingsRecentlypsychologicalsciencerelatedfieldssurprisinglylargeamountexperimentsreplicatedindependentnon-replicationindicatepreviousfindingfalsepositivestatisticalresultexistalsomeanspecificdetailessentialemergeincludedThereforereplicateinformativecloselyadheredOneproposedempiricalpsychologyuploadscriptpublicbelievemerelysufficientfreelyavailablechangetimeconsumingsetarguesimpleproblemsexperimentconductedcomputers:examplecapturevideoonlinethereforeprovidebrieftutorialopensourceinformationindividualablerecordhopeusecomputerassisteddatacollectionScreenRecordingsToolDocumentComputerAssistedDataCollectionProceduresdocumentation

Similar Articles

Cited By (3)