Biomarkers in the diagnosis and symptom assessment of patients with bladder pain syndrome: a systematic review.

Thais F Magalhaes, Edmund C Baracat, Stergios K Doumouchtsis, Jorge M Haddad
Author Information
  1. Thais F Magalhaes: Urogynecology Division, Discipline of Gynecology, Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo, 255 Dr Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar Ave, 10th floor, Sao Paulo, 05402-000, Brazil. thaisfdemagalhaes@gmail.com. ORCID
  2. Edmund C Baracat: Urogynecology Division, Discipline of Gynecology, Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo, 255 Dr Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar Ave, 10th floor, Sao Paulo, 05402-000, Brazil.
  3. Stergios K Doumouchtsis: Epsom & St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.
  4. Jorge M Haddad: Urogynecology Division, Discipline of Gynecology, Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo, 255 Dr Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar Ave, 10th floor, Sao Paulo, 05402-000, Brazil.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Bladder pain syndrome (BPS) is a disease of unknown etiology defined as an unpleasant sensation related to the bladder, associated with lower urinary tract symptoms of more than 6 weeks' duration, in the absence of any identifiable causes. Despite its impact on quality of life (QoL) and socioeconomic burden, there are no objective methods for the diagnosis or assessment of therapeutic response. We systematically reviewed biomarkers associated with BPS to update the current knowledge on this issue.
METHODS: A systematic review of the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed/MEDLINE, LILACS, SCOPUS, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases was conducted following the PRISMA statement. Original articles investigating biomarkers for the diagnosis or symptom assessment of patients with BPS were assessed; no language restrictions were applied. Animal or post-mortem studies were excluded.
RESULTS: Of the 478 records retrieved, 11 articles were included. MIF, NGF, Etio-S, APF, and a combined methylhistamine/Il-6 model were increased in BPS urine samples versus controls. Also increased were glyceraldehyde in stool, in addition to the expression of some genes (ARID1A, ARF, CHAT, eNOS, GLI-1, iNOS, MCP-1, NGF, WNT-8A, WNT-10A), nerve density, IL-16, VCAM-1, and ICAM-1 in bladder tissue specimens. In contrast, some fecal bacteria, expression of other genes (CHT, HB-EGF, OCT-1, SMRT-1, WNT11) in the bladder urothelium, and urinary DNA methylation in CpG-sites, MCP-3, G5P1, and HB-EGF were decreased in BPS. As none of the biomarkers was studied more than once, a Forest plot could not be constructed. Only 4 articles reported the relation of biomarkers to symptom scores.
CONCLUSIONS: Potential biomarkers for BPS in urine, stool, and bladder biopsy specimens are described. Further research is needed before their use in clinical practice.

Keywords

References

  1. World J Urol. 2007 Oct;25(5):499-504 [PMID: 17694391]
  2. J Urol. 2009 Jun;181(6):2555-61 [PMID: 19375108]
  3. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016 Jan-Feb;22(1):16-23 [PMID: 26571430]
  4. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Apr;37(4):1485-1493 [PMID: 29363787]
  5. J Urol. 2011 Aug;186(2):540-4 [PMID: 21683389]
  6. Scand J Urol. 2016 Aug;50(4):292-7 [PMID: 27002743]
  7. Int J Urol. 2014 Apr;21 Suppl 1:34-41 [PMID: 24807491]
  8. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Jun;295(6):1341-1359 [PMID: 28391486]
  9. Eur Urol. 2008 Jan;53(1):60-7 [PMID: 17900797]
  10. J Urol. 2015 May;193(5):1545-53 [PMID: 25623737]
  11. J Urol. 2006 Apr;175(4):1523-8 [PMID: 16516040]
  12. J Urol. 2013 Jan;189(1):141-5 [PMID: 23164386]
  13. Sci Rep. 2016 May 18;6:26083 [PMID: 27188581]
  14. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2009 Aug;15(8):1183-9 [PMID: 19235886]
  15. J Urol. 2019 Nov;202(5):880-889 [PMID: 30925127]
  16. Prog Urol. 2015 Mar;25(4):188-99 [PMID: 25482921]
  17. Cell Cycle. 2017 Apr 18;16(8):749-758 [PMID: 28278053]
  18. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2018 Mar 1;314(3):R334-R341 [PMID: 29092859]
  19. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Apr;23(4):474-482 [PMID: 28345436]
  20. PLoS One. 2015 May 28;10(5):e0127628 [PMID: 26020638]
  21. J Urol. 2004 Apr;171(4):1698-703 [PMID: 15017269]
  22. Urology. 2009 May;73(5):987-92 [PMID: 19394494]
  23. Neurourol Urodyn. 2014 Nov;33(8):1193-201 [PMID: 23946107]
  24. J Urol. 2000 Dec;164(6):1908-11 [PMID: 11061878]
  25. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Apr;175:30-7 [PMID: 24480114]
  26. J Urol. 2011 Jun;185(6):2162-70 [PMID: 21497847]
  27. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):4-20 [PMID: 19941278]
  28. EBioMedicine. 2016 May;7:167-74 [PMID: 27322470]
  29. Neuroscience. 2007 Nov 9;149(3):660-72 [PMID: 17920206]
  30. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1958 Oct;18(10):1056-66 [PMID: 13587621]
  31. J Urol. 2007 Jul;178(1):145-52 [PMID: 17499305]
  32. Br J Urol. 1997 Apr;79(4):572-7 [PMID: 9126085]
  33. BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2535 [PMID: 19622551]
  34. J Urol. 1999 Feb;161(2):553-7 [PMID: 9915447]
  35. Urology. 2003 Jan;61(1):37-49 [PMID: 12559262]
  36. Mol Pharmacol. 2007 Jun;71(6):1582-90 [PMID: 17341652]
  37. J Urol. 1999 Jun;161(6):1786-90 [PMID: 10332435]
  38. FEBS Lett. 2007 Aug 7;581(20):3795-9 [PMID: 17628545]
  39. Urology. 2001 Jun;57(6 Suppl 1):26-9 [PMID: 11378046]
  40. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2017 Mar 1;312(3):R292-R300 [PMID: 27974317]
  41. Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 14;8(1):4505 [PMID: 29540744]
  42. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2018 Feb;27(2):159-163 [PMID: 29521057]
  43. World J Urol. 2013 Feb;31(1):241-6 [PMID: 22441309]
  44. Urology. 2001 Jun;57(6 Suppl 1):67-81 [PMID: 11378053]
  45. Urology. 2006 Oct;68(4):702-6 [PMID: 17070335]
  46. Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 28;8(1):9782 [PMID: 29955137]
  47. Urology. 2018 Jun;116:55-62 [PMID: 29580781]
  48. Urology. 2004 Jan;63(1):22-6 [PMID: 14751340]
  49. Can J Urol. 2010 Feb;17(1):4989-94 [PMID: 20156378]

MeSH Term

Biomarkers
Cystitis, Interstitial
Humans
Symptom Assessment

Chemicals

Biomarkers

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0BPSbladderbiomarkersdiagnosisassessmentarticlessymptompainassociatedurinarysymptomssystematicreviewpatientsNGFincreasedurinestoolexpressiongenesspecimensHB-EGFINTRODUCTIONANDHYPOTHESIS:Bladdersyndromediseaseunknownetiologydefinedunpleasantsensationrelatedlowertract6 weeks'durationabsenceidentifiablecausesDespiteimpactqualitylifeQoLsocioeconomicburdenobjectivemethodstherapeuticresponsesystematicallyreviewedupdatecurrentknowledgeissueMETHODS:CochraneLibraryEmbasePubMed/MEDLINELILACSSCOPUSClinicalTrialsgovdatabasesconductedfollowingPRISMAstatementOriginalinvestigatingassessedlanguagerestrictionsappliedAnimalpost-mortemstudiesexcludedRESULTS:478recordsretrieved11includedMIFEtio-SAPFcombinedmethylhistamine/Il-6modelsamplesversuscontrolsAlsoglyceraldehydeadditionARID1AARFCHATeNOSGLI-1iNOSMCP-1WNT-8AWNT-10AnervedensityIL-16VCAM-1ICAM-1tissuecontrastfecalbacteriaCHTOCT-1SMRT-1WNT11urotheliumDNAmethylationCpG-sitesMCP-3G5P1decreasednonestudiedForestplotconstructed4reportedrelationscoresCONCLUSIONS:PotentialbiopsydescribedresearchneededuseclinicalpracticeBiomarkerssyndrome:DiagnosisInterstitialcystitisSigns

Similar Articles

Cited By