Conventional oral and secondary high dose vaginal metronidazole therapy for recurrent bacterial vaginosis: clinical outcomes, impacts of sex and menses.

Jack D Sobel, Navkiranjot Kaur, Nicole A Woznicki, Dina Boikov, Tina Aguin, Gurveer Gill, Robert A Akins
Author Information
  1. Jack D Sobel: Division of Infectious Diseases, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
  2. Navkiranjot Kaur: Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology, and Immunology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit MI, USA.
  3. Nicole A Woznicki: Division of Infectious Diseases, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
  4. Dina Boikov: Division of Infectious Diseases, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
  5. Tina Aguin: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
  6. Gurveer Gill: Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology, and Immunology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit MI, USA.
  7. Robert A Akins: Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology, and Immunology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit MI, USA.

Abstract

PURPOSE: Oral metronidazole therapy is the standard of care for bacterial vaginosis (BV), yet it has alarming rates of recurrence and refractory responses among recurrent BV (RBV) patients. This study addresses whether high dose vaginal metronidazole therapy (HDM) is beneficial in RBV patients who fail after standard of care (SOC) therapy, whether diagnostic test scores proximal to the HDM predict clinical outcome, and whether menses, coitus, or race influences therapy outcome.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 90 patients with RBV were given SOC and tracked 74 for up to 9 months. Refractory or recurrent patients (57) with symptomatic BV were given HDM and followed for up to 8 months. Patients were evaluated by Amsel criteria, Nugent score, and a qPCR assay that assesses the content.
RESULTS: HDM achieved at least short-term remission in 68% of the patients who were refractory to or recurred after SOC and provided a 10-day increase in the mean duration of remission among patients who eventually recurred (=0.027). Patients with prolonged dysbiosis (pH >5 or Amsel 4) before symptomatic recurrence were more likely to recur after subsequent HDM. Most recurrence happened within 10 days of menses, but sex in this cohort was not associated with clinical outcome. Mean diagnostic BV scores of African American patients in remission were inferior to scores of a small cohort of Caucasian patients in remission.
CONCLUSION: Encouraging results obtained with HDM justify a prospective, randomized study to determine if follow-up HDM is beneficial among a broader cohort of women failing conventional oral metronidazole therapy.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001 Jul;74(1):35-43 [PMID: 11430939]
  2. Transplant Proc. 2003 Nov;35(7):2696-7 [PMID: 14612078]
  3. BMC Infect Dis. 2004 Feb 13;4:5 [PMID: 15018635]
  4. JAMA. 1992 Jul 1;268(1):92-5 [PMID: 1535108]
  5. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Dec;191(6):1898-906 [PMID: 15592270]
  6. Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Nov;106(5 Pt 1):1013-23 [PMID: 16260520]
  7. BMC Infect Dis. 2006 Mar 16;6:51 [PMID: 16542416]
  8. J Infect Dis. 2006 Jun 1;193(11):1478-86 [PMID: 16652274]
  9. Anaerobe. 2006 Oct-Dec;12(5-6):227-30 [PMID: 16893662]
  10. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007 Oct;134(2):188-91 [PMID: 17123692]
  11. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Aug;197(2):170.e1-7 [PMID: 17689638]
  12. Sex Transm Dis. 2008 Jan;35(1):78-83 [PMID: 17989585]
  13. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jan;198(1):97.e1-6 [PMID: 18005928]
  14. Sex Transm Dis. 2007 Dec;34(12):954-9 [PMID: 18077845]
  15. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2008 Apr-Jun;26(2):155-7 [PMID: 18445953]
  16. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008 Sep;102(3):287-92 [PMID: 18603245]
  17. Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Dec 1;47(11):1426-35 [PMID: 18947329]
  18. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2009 Feb;22(1):82-6 [PMID: 19532085]
  19. Sex Transm Dis. 2009 Nov;36(11):732-4 [PMID: 19704395]
  20. PLoS One. 2010 Jan 06;5(1):e8422 [PMID: 20066050]
  21. PLoS One. 2010 Apr 15;5(4):e10197 [PMID: 20419168]
  22. J Clin Periodontol. 2010 Oct;37(10):888-93 [PMID: 20636412]
  23. BJOG. 2011 Jan;118(2):154-63 [PMID: 21054765]
  24. Anaerobe. 2011 Aug;17(4):191-5 [PMID: 21376827]
  25. Arzneimittelforschung. 2011;61(4):260-5 [PMID: 21650086]
  26. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e34540 [PMID: 22509319]
  27. Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Mar;56(6):777-86 [PMID: 23243173]
  28. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57688 [PMID: 23472099]
  29. AIDS. 2013 Aug 24;27(13):2141-53 [PMID: 23660575]
  30. J Clin Med Res. 2013 Aug;5(4):309-15 [PMID: 23864922]
  31. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2014 Apr;18(2):156-61 [PMID: 23994951]
  32. PLoS One. 2013 Sep 04;8(9):e73055 [PMID: 24023807]
  33. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Jun;289(6):1225-34 [PMID: 24318276]
  34. Sex Transm Dis. 2014 Jan;41(1):58-60 [PMID: 24335744]
  35. PLoS One. 2013 Dec 20;8(12):e82599 [PMID: 24376552]
  36. Sex Transm Dis. 2014 May;41(5):290-1 [PMID: 24722380]
  37. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2014 Jun;71(6):555-63 [PMID: 24832618]
  38. Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Apr 1;60(7):1042-53 [PMID: 25516188]
  39. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2015 Jun;7(2):164-71 [PMID: 25588687]
  40. Pathog Dis. 2015 Jul;73(5):null [PMID: 25838136]
  41. MBio. 2015 Jun 16;6(3):e00589 [PMID: 26081632]
  42. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016 Jan;84(1):1-3 [PMID: 26514076]
  43. Sex Transm Dis. 2016 Mar;43(3):172-6 [PMID: 26859804]
  44. Ann Transl Med. 2016 Feb;4(4):85 [PMID: 27004232]
  45. Microbiome. 2016 Apr 19;4:16 [PMID: 27090518]
  46. PLoS One. 2016 Apr 19;11(4):e0153441 [PMID: 27093291]
  47. PLoS One. 2016 Apr 25;11(4):e0154086 [PMID: 27111438]
  48. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Mar;10(3):QC04-7 [PMID: 27134945]
  49. J Infect Dis. 2016 Aug 15;214 Suppl 1:S1-5 [PMID: 27449868]
  50. Sex Transm Infect. 2018 Feb;94(1):75-77 [PMID: 27645157]
  51. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2016 Sep 30;10(9):913-919 [PMID: 27694723]
  52. J Infect Dis. 2017 Mar 1;215(5):723-731 [PMID: 28007924]
  53. Biochem Cell Biol. 2017 Feb;95(1):31-33 [PMID: 28140620]
  54. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Jun;295(6):1331-1339 [PMID: 28386675]
  55. Microbiome. 2017 Aug 14;5(1):99 [PMID: 28807017]
  56. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 Jan;297(1):109-116 [PMID: 28983665]
  57. Benef Microbes. 2018 Jan 29;9(1):35-50 [PMID: 29065710]
  58. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2018 Feb;47(2):81-86 [PMID: 29196153]
  59. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018 Feb 14;84(5): [PMID: 29269494]
  60. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 Jul;298(1):139-145 [PMID: 29637269]
  61. mSphere. 2018 Jun 6;3(3): [PMID: 29875146]
  62. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2018 Nov 14;26:e3077 [PMID: 30462789]
  63. Benef Microbes. 2019 Feb 8;10(1):19-26 [PMID: 30525953]
  64. BMC Womens Health. 2019 Jan 31;19(1):25 [PMID: 30704451]
  65. J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Apr 26;57(5): [PMID: 30842235]
  66. Sex Transm Infect. 2019 Mar 14;:null [PMID: 30872415]
  67. Sex Transm Dis. 1987 Apr-Jun;14(2):122-3 [PMID: 3497456]
  68. Am J Med. 1983 Jan;74(1):14-22 [PMID: 6600371]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0patientsHDMtherapymetronidazoleBVremissionbacterialrecurrenceamongrecurrentRBVwhetherSOCscoresclinicaloutcomemensescohortstandardcarevaginosisrefractorystudyhighdosevaginalbeneficialdiagnosticgivenmonthssymptomaticPatientsAmselcriteriascorerecurredsexoralPURPOSE:OralyetalarmingratesresponsesaddressesfailtestproximalpredictcoitusraceinfluencesPATIENTSANDMETHODS:total90tracked749Refractory57followed8evaluatedNugentqPCRassayassessescontentRESULTS:achievedleastshort-term68%provided10-dayincreasemeandurationeventually=0027prolongeddysbiosispH>54likelyrecursubsequenthappenedwithin10daysassociatedMeanAfricanAmericaninferiorsmallCaucasianCONCLUSION:Encouragingresultsobtainedjustifyprospectiverandomizeddeterminefollow-upbroaderwomenfailingconventionalConventionalsecondaryvaginosis:outcomesimpactsLbRCamselnugentprognosis

Similar Articles

Cited By