Although some studies have been conducted on the effects of foreign protein expression on rice, the results vary with foreign gene types and protein expression. This study reveals the effects of fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) expression on mature rice seeds in various aspects. Results revealed that the grain weight of the transgene rice was lower than that of non-transgenic wild-type. The sucrose content and ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (AGPase) activity in transgenic rice were higher than that in non-transgenic wild-type rice, while changes in the starch content, starch branching enzyme (SBE), sucrose synthase (SuS), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and peroxidase (POD) activity were lower in transgenic rice compared to non-transgenic wild-type. The scanning electron microscope results revealed that mature seeds of the transgenic rice contained fewer vascular bundles with irregular arrangement compared to the wild-type. The mature seeds of CK and T1 rice lines were collected for proteome analysis, and 167 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were found. In addition, the most enriched pathways in both rice lines were determined to be amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism and starch and sucrose metabolism, This study laid the foundation for revealing the effects of exogenous protein expression on rice bioreactors.
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 14;7(1):3468
[PMID:
28615669]
J Food Sci. 2015 Jun;80(6):H1412-7
[PMID:
25944160]
Plant Sci. 2012 Jan;182:101-11
[PMID:
22118621]
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009 Feb;1794(2):315-23
[PMID:
19064002]
Plant Mol Biol. 2017 Mar;93(4-5):479-496
[PMID:
28012053]
Funct Plant Biol. 2013 Dec;40(12):1249-1260
[PMID:
32481192]
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 4;7(1):10309
[PMID:
28871157]
J Biol Chem. 2003 Aug 15;278(33):31286-9
[PMID:
12773541]
Plant Mol Biol. 1999 Aug;40(6):911-20
[PMID:
10527416]
Plant Physiol. 1997 Jul;114(3):771-8
[PMID:
9232868]
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2014 Nov;16(6):1058-64
[PMID:
24533577]
Ann Bot. 2011 May;107(7):1127-40
[PMID:
21169293]
Planta. 2006 Aug;224(3):598-611
[PMID:
16552590]
Plant Biotechnol J. 2013 Jan;11(1):66-76
[PMID:
23066780]
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Dec 06;8:2089
[PMID:
29270189]
Plant Cell. 1991 Oct;3(10):1063-1072
[PMID:
12324582]
Plant Sci. 2017 Oct;263:201-209
[PMID:
28818376]
J Biol Chem. 2005 Jan 21;280(3):2105-15
[PMID:
15501829]
Food Chem. 2016 Jul 15;203:301-307
[PMID:
26948618]
DNA Res. 2013 Dec;20(6):623-31
[PMID:
23956243]
Plant Biotechnol J. 2016 Jan;14(1):97-108
[PMID:
25845722]
Plant Cell. 1990 Jul;2(7):673-84
[PMID:
2152343]
Plant J. 2009 Nov;60(4):716-28
[PMID:
19682284]
Plant Mol Biol. 2003 May;52(2):247-58
[PMID:
12856933]
Plant Mol Biol. 1994 May;25(2):241-57
[PMID:
8018873]
Nature. 2011 May 19;473(7347):337-42
[PMID:
21593866]
Plant Physiol. 1995 Nov;109(3):1069-1076
[PMID:
12228653]
FEBS Lett. 1997 Dec 8;419(1):69-75
[PMID:
9426222]
J Plant Physiol. 2004 Feb;161(2):139-49
[PMID:
15022827]
J Proteomics. 2018 Jan 6;170:1-13
[PMID:
28986270]
J Biomed Biotechnol. 2006;2006(2):25376
[PMID:
16883050]
Funct Integr Genomics. 2016 Jul;16(4):399-418
[PMID:
27075731]
Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2017 Dec;38:59-65
[PMID:
28887067]
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Dec 1;112(48):14984-9
[PMID:
26578814]
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Jun 16;7:855
[PMID:
27379138]
