[Transcatheter mitral valve replacement: current status].

J Vogelhuber, M Weber, J-M Sinning, G Nickenig
Author Information
  1. G Nickenig: Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg - Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland. georg.nickenig@ukbonn.de.

Abstract

After aortic valve stenosis, mitral regurgitation (MR) is the second most common valvular disease, particulary affecting older patients. Optimal medical treatment within the context of heart failure therapy is the favored first-line therapy for secondary MR. If symptoms persist despite optimal medical therapy, surgical or transcatheter mitral valve repair is indicated (recommendation class IIb). In contrast, surgical treatment is essential for patients with symptomatic primary MR and left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >30% and justifiable perioperative risk (repair preferred over replacement, recommendation class I); for high-risk patients, interventional transcatheter mitral valve repair (especially by "edge-to-edge-reconstruction") is a viable option (recommendation class IIb).Recently, transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) has come into focus as another attractive treatment option and is currently under intensive research. At first, the TMVR was used both for patients with symptomatic insufficiency or stenosis after biological mitral valve replacement (Bio-MKE) or after reconstruction as a "valve-in-valve" or "valve-in-ring" procedure. Therefore, transcatheter aortic valve prostheses were used.In the past few years several dedicated TMVR prostheses were developed for the treatment of native MR. So far, no TMVR prosthesis is CE-certified. All of the following TMVR methods are under clinical evaluation in the scope of pivotal trials. The interdisciplinary heart team, consisting of experienced cardiologists and heart surgeons develops a patient-specific, individual treatment concept considering the particular MR etiology, pre-existing comorbidities, age, clinical symptoms, and status.

Keywords

References

  1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 May 2;69(17):2175-2192 [PMID: 28449780]
  2. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jan 31;69(4):381-391 [PMID: 28040318]
  3. Interv Cardiol Clin. 2019 Jul;8(3):295-300 [PMID: 31078185]
  4. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Nov;7(6):787-791 [PMID: 30598894]
  5. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jul;8(7):e002135 [PMID: 26156148]
  6. EuroIntervention. 2015 Sep;11 Suppl W:W82-3 [PMID: 26384202]
  7. Eur Heart J. 2017 Sep 21;38(36):2739-2791 [PMID: 28886619]
  8. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Nov 3;66(18):2019-2037 [PMID: 26516006]
  9. EuroIntervention. 2019 May 22;:null [PMID: 31130525]
  10. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jan 21;63(2):185-6 [PMID: 24036029]
  11. EuroIntervention. 2016 Feb;11(10):1126-31 [PMID: 26342591]
  12. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Feb 10;65(5):437-48 [PMID: 25660921]
  13. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Oct 28;64(17):1814-9 [PMID: 25443704]
  14. Innovations (Phila). 2016 May-Jun;11(3):174-8 [PMID: 27537190]
  15. Am J Cardiol. 2015 Nov 15;116(10):1555-9 [PMID: 26409640]
  16. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jan 2;71(1):12-21 [PMID: 29102689]
  17. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Aug 28;10(16):1662-1670 [PMID: 28838477]
  18. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2019 May;112(5):354-362 [PMID: 31014990]
  19. Eur Heart J. 2007 Jun;28(11):1358-65 [PMID: 17350971]
  20. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jun;7(3):400-9 [PMID: 24944303]
  21. EuroIntervention. 2016 Sep 18;12(Y):Y78-80 [PMID: 27640043]
  22. World J Cardiol. 2019 Feb 26;11(2):71-83 [PMID: 30820277]
  23. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2019 Mar 30;21(4):19 [PMID: 30929092]
  24. ESC Heart Fail. 2018 Aug;5(4):552-561 [PMID: 29676043]
  25. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Dec;94(6):1870-7; discussion 1877-9 [PMID: 22858278]
  26. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Sep;6(5):453-462 [PMID: 29062740]

MeSH Term

Cardiac Catheterization
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation
Humans
Mitral Valve
Mitral Valve Insufficiency
Treatment Outcome

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0valvemitralMRtreatmentTMVRpatientstranscatheterreplacementhearttherapyrepairrecommendationaorticstenosismedicalfailuresymptomssurgicalclassIIbsymptomaticoptionusedinsufficiencyprosthesesclinicalHeartregurgitationsecondcommonvalvulardiseaseparticularyaffectingolderOptimalwithincontextfavoredfirst-linesecondarypersistdespiteoptimalindicatedcontrastessentialprimaryleft-ventricularejectionfractionLVEF>30%justifiableperioperativeriskpreferredclass Ihigh-riskinterventionalespecially"edge-to-edge-reconstruction"a viableRecentlycomefocusanotherattractivecurrentlyintensiveresearchfirstbiologicalBio-MKEreconstructiona "valve-in-valve""valve-in-ring"procedureThereforeInpastyearsseveraldedicateddevelopednativefarprosthesisCE-certifiedfollowingmethodsevaluationscopepivotaltrialsinterdisciplinaryteamconsistingexperiencedcardiologistssurgeonsdevelopsa patient-specificindividualconceptconsideringparticularetiologypre-existingcomorbiditiesagestatus[Transcatheterreplacement:currentstatus]diseasesHeart-TeamMitralTranscatheter

Similar Articles

Cited By