Managing high fiber food waste for the cultivation of black soldier fly larvae.

Lydia Palma, Jesus Fernandez-Bayo, Deb Niemeier, Maurice Pitesky, Jean S VanderGheynst
Author Information
  1. Lydia Palma: 1Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616 USA.
  2. Jesus Fernandez-Bayo: 1Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616 USA.
  3. Deb Niemeier: 2Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616 USA.
  4. Maurice Pitesky: 3School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616 USA.
  5. Jean S VanderGheynst: 1Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616 USA. ORCID

Abstract

Increases in global human population are leading to increasing demands for food production and waste management. Insect biomass is a sustainable alternative to traditional animal feeds when insects are produced on lignocellulosic by-products. Resources high in lignocellulose have high carbon to nitrogen ratios and require nitrogen supplementation to accelerate bioconversion. Here we report on studies that examine the influence of nitrogen supplementation of almond hull-based feedstocks on black soldier fly larvae ( L.) cultivation and composition. Decreasing carbon to nitrogen ratio from 49 to 16 increased larvae harvest dry weight, specific larvae growth, and yield by 36%, 31%, and 51%, respectively. However, the decrease in carbon to nitrogen ratio decreased larvae methionine and cysteine contents by 11% and 13%, respectively. The findings demonstrate that carbon to nitrogen ratio can be managed to enhance bioconversion of lignocellulose to larvae, but that this management approach can reduce larvae amino acid content.

Keywords

References

  1. PLoS One. 2010 Dec 29;5(12):e14445 [PMID: 21206900]
  2. Annu Rev Entomol. 2013;58:563-83 [PMID: 23020616]
  3. J Anim Sci. 2016 Jan;94(1):349-58 [PMID: 26812340]
  4. Forensic Sci Int. 2016 Sep;266:109-116 [PMID: 27236368]
  5. Animal. 2016 Dec;10(12):1923-1930 [PMID: 27339654]
  6. J Sci Food Agric. 2017 Jun;97(8):2594-2600 [PMID: 27734508]
  7. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2017 Jun;30(6):828-833 [PMID: 28002933]
  8. PLoS One. 2017 Aug 10;12(8):e0182601 [PMID: 28796830]
  9. PLoS One. 2017 Aug 24;12(8):e0183188 [PMID: 28837591]
  10. Foods. 2017 Oct 18;6(10):null [PMID: 29057841]
  11. J Environ Manage. 2018 Jul 1;217:668-676 [PMID: 29654970]
  12. J Sci Food Agric. 2018 Dec;98(15):5893-5900 [PMID: 29999178]
  13. Waste Manag. 2018 Dec;82:302-318 [PMID: 30509593]