Antibiotic-Induced, Increased Conjugative Transfer Is Common to Diverse Naturally Occurring ESBL Plasmids in .

Gang Liu, Karolina Bogaj, Valeria Bortolaia, John Elmerdahl Olsen, Line Elnif Thomsen
Author Information
  1. Gang Liu: Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  2. Karolina Bogaj: Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  3. Valeria Bortolaia: National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
  4. John Elmerdahl Olsen: Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  5. Line Elnif Thomsen: Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Abstract

Previously, we showed that cefotaxime (CTX) exposure increases conjugative transfer of a encoding IncI1 plasmid (IncI1/pST49/CTX-M-1) in in a SOS-independent manner. This study aimed at investigating whether the observation was unique for that plasmid/strain/antibiotic combination or whether antibiotic-induced plasmid transfer (PT) is a more general phenomenon among plasmids in . Whole genome sequences of 25 strains were analyzed to identify different extended spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) plasmids enabling selection of a diverse collection of plasmids. Experiments were performed following exposure of these strains to 1/2 minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of CTX, ampicillin (AMP), or ciprofloxacin (CIP) before conjugation experiments. The frequency of PT was measured and compared to that of donors not exposed to antibiotics. Reverse-transcribed-quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was used to measure mRNA levels of five PT genes and two SOS response genes in donors exposed to antibiotics. The PT of eight strains (30.8% of strains tested) with IncI1/pST7/CTX-M-1, IncI1/pST49/CTX-M-1, IncI1/pST3/CTX-M-1, IncI1/pST293/CTX-M-1, IncI1/pST295/CTX-M-1, IncI1/pST16/CTX-M-55, and IncFII/CTX-M-14 ( = 2) plasmids was significantly increased following antibiotic exposure. CTX increased PT in all of these eight strain/plasmid combinations, AMP and CIP increased the PT in six and three strains, respectively. RT-qPCR showed that PT genes were up-regulated in the presence of the three antibiotics, whereas SOS-response genes were up-regulated only following CIP exposure. Our findings reveal that antibiotics can increase PT in strains with various ESBL plasmids. Thus, antibiotic-induced conjugative transfer of ESBL plasmids appears to be a common phenomenon in , having important implications for assessing the risks of antibiotic use.

Keywords

References

  1. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015 Jan;70(1):62-70 [PMID: 25182062]
  2. Front Microbiol. 2016 Feb 19;7:173 [PMID: 26925045]
  3. Bioinformatics. 2014 Aug 1;30(15):2114-20 [PMID: 24695404]
  4. J Bacteriol. 1993 Oct;175(19):6134-41 [PMID: 8407786]
  5. J Gen Microbiol. 1980 Feb;116(2):475-84 [PMID: 6989956]
  6. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005 Sep;3(9):700-10 [PMID: 16138098]
  7. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2015;13(9):1139-58 [PMID: 26162631]
  8. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Aug 12;364(1527):2275-89 [PMID: 19571247]
  9. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008 Apr;61(4):845-52 [PMID: 18238887]
  10. J Microbiol Methods. 2005 Dec;63(3):219-28 [PMID: 15935499]
  11. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1998;21:291-319 [PMID: 25508777]
  12. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Nov 22;61(12): [PMID: 28993333]
  13. Plasmid. 2017 Mar;90:10-14 [PMID: 28137396]
  14. J Bacteriol. 2002 Jul;184(14):3839-47 [PMID: 12081954]
  15. Nature. 2004 Jan 1;427(6969):72-4 [PMID: 14688795]
  16. BMC Microbiol. 2012 Mar 19;12:37 [PMID: 22429905]
  17. FEBS Lett. 2016 Feb;590(3):376-86 [PMID: 26785931]
  18. Annu Rev Genet. 2015;49:577-601 [PMID: 26473380]
  19. PLoS One. 2016 Jun 21;11(6):e0157718 [PMID: 27327771]
  20. Plasmid. 1978 Jun;1(3):417-20 [PMID: 372973]
  21. Br J Pharmacol. 2008 Mar;153 Suppl 1:S347-57 [PMID: 18193080]
  22. Front Microbiol. 2017 Nov 29;8:2365 [PMID: 29238335]
  23. Cell Mol Life Sci. 1999 Nov 30;56(9-10):742-54 [PMID: 11212334]
  24. Water Res. 2019 Jul 1;158:383-391 [PMID: 31059932]
  25. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009 Aug;64(2):301-9 [PMID: 19474065]
  26. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jan 5;107(1):127-32 [PMID: 20007769]
  27. Front Microbiol. 2011 Jul 26;2:158 [PMID: 21845185]
  28. J Bacteriol. 1992 Oct;174(20):6666-73 [PMID: 1400217]
  29. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1986 Apr;17(4):409-13 [PMID: 3710955]
  30. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;532:397-411 [PMID: 19271198]
  31. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014 Nov;13:20-9 [PMID: 25051226]
  32. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Oct;77(20):7104-12 [PMID: 21856835]
  33. J Bacteriol. 1981 Mar;145(3):1365-73 [PMID: 7009583]
  34. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 May 1;29(9):e45 [PMID: 11328886]
  35. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011 Jul;17(7):1216-22 [PMID: 21762575]
  36. J Comput Biol. 2012 May;19(5):455-77 [PMID: 22506599]
  37. Nat Microbiol. 2016 Apr 11;1(6):16044 [PMID: 27572835]
  38. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2011 Dec;30(12):1092-3 [PMID: 22105419]
  39. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Feb;70(2):758-64 [PMID: 14766552]
  40. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009 Sep;64 Suppl 1:i3-10 [PMID: 19675017]
  41. J Gen Microbiol. 1972 Apr;70(2):361-4 [PMID: 4556858]
  42. Microb Pathog. 2018 Jan;114:57-62 [PMID: 29174700]
  43. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2006 Nov;28(5):402-7 [PMID: 17027237]
  44. Data Brief. 2017 Apr 23;12:423-426 [PMID: 28516137]
  45. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2010 Jan;34(1):18-40 [PMID: 19919603]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0PTplasmidsstrainsexposuretransferESBLantibioticsgenesantibioticCTXplasmidfollowingCIPincreasedshowedconjugativeIncI1/pST49/CTX-M-1whetherantibiotic-inducedphenomenonextendedspectrumbeta-lactamasesAMPconjugationdonorsexposedRT-qPCReightthreeup-regulatedPreviouslycefotaximeincreasesencodingIncI1SOS-independentmannerstudyaimedinvestigatingobservationuniqueplasmid/strain/antibioticcombinationgeneralamongWholegenomesequences25analyzedidentifydifferentenablingselectiondiversecollectionExperimentsperformed1/2minimalinhibitoryconcentrationMICampicillinciprofloxacinexperimentsfrequencymeasuredcomparedReverse-transcribed-quantitativerealtimepolymerasechainreactionusedmeasuremRNAlevelsfivetwoSOSresponse308%testedIncI1/pST7/CTX-M-1IncI1/pST3/CTX-M-1IncI1/pST293/CTX-M-1IncI1/pST295/CTX-M-1IncI1/pST16/CTX-M-55IncFII/CTX-M-14=2significantlystrain/plasmidcombinationssixrespectivelypresencewhereasSOS-responsefindingsrevealcanincreasevariousThusappearscommonimportantimplicationsassessingrisksuseAntibiotic-InducedIncreasedConjugativeTransferCommonDiverseNaturallyOccurringPlasmidsEscherichiacoliinducedresistance

Similar Articles

Cited By