Digital Health Professions Education in the Field of Pediatrics: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration.

Serena Brusamento, Bhone Myint Kyaw, Penny Whiting, Li Li, Lorainne Tudor Car
Author Information
  1. Serena Brusamento: Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom. ORCID
  2. Bhone Myint Kyaw: Centre for Population Health Sciences, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore. ORCID
  3. Penny Whiting: Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom. ORCID
  4. Li Li: Office of Medical Education, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore. ORCID
  5. Lorainne Tudor Car: Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reducing childhood morbidity and mortality is challenging, particularly in countries with a shortage of qualified health care workers. Lack of trainers makes it difficult to provide the necessary continuing education in pediatrics for postregistration health professionals. Digital education, teaching and learning by means of digital technologies, has the potential to deliver medical education to a large audience while limiting the number of trainers needed.
OBJECTIVE: The goal of the research was to evaluate whether digital education can replace traditional learning to improve postregistration health professionals' knowledge, skills, attitudes, and satisfaction and foster behavior change in the field of pediatrics.
METHODS: We completed a systematic review of the literature by following the Cochrane methodology. We searched 7 major electronic databases for articles published from January 1990 to August 2017. No language restrictions were applied. We independently selected studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias, and pairs of authors compared information. We contacted authors of studies for additional information if necessary. All pooled analyses were based on random effects models. We included individually or cluster randomized controlled trials that compared digital education with traditional learning, no intervention, or other forms of digital education. We assessed the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) criteria.
RESULTS: Twenty studies (1382 participants) were included. Participants included pediatricians, physicians, nurses, and midwives. Digital education technologies were assessed including high-fidelity mannequins (6 studies), computer-based education (12 studies), mobile learning (1 study), and virtual reality (1 study). Most studies reported that digital education was either as effective as or more effective than the control intervention for outcomes including skill, knowledge, attitude, and satisfaction. High-fidelity mannequins were associated with higher postintervention skill scores compared with low-fidelity mannequins (standardized mean difference 0.62; 95% CI 0.17-1.06; moderate effect size, low-quality evidence). One study reported physician change in practicing behavior and found similar effects between offline plus online digital education and no intervention. The only study that assessed impact on patient outcome found no difference between intervention and control groups. None of the included studies reported adverse or untoward effects or economic outcomes of the digital education interventions. The risk of bias was mainly unclear or high. The quality of evidence was low due to study inconsistencies, limitations, or imprecision across the studies.
CONCLUSIONS: Digital education for postregistration health professions education in pediatrics is at least as effective as traditional learning and more effective than no learning. High-fidelity mannequins were found to be more effective at improving skills than traditional learning with low-fidelity mannequins. Computer-based offline/online digital education was better than no intervention for knowledge and skill outcomes and as good as traditional face-to-face learning. This review highlights evidence gaps calling for more methodologically rigorous randomized controlled trials on the topic.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42017057793; https://tinyurl.com/y5q9q5o6.

Keywords

References

  1. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 25;21(3):e13165 [PMID: 30907731]
  2. J Glob Health. 2014 Jun;4(1):010405 [PMID: 24976964]
  3. J Pediatr. 2011 Feb;158(2 Suppl):e5-7 [PMID: 21238706]
  4. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(4):391-9 [PMID: 25924019]
  5. JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Aug 1;170(8):765-71 [PMID: 27322089]
  6. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Feb 25;21(2):e13269 [PMID: 30801252]
  7. Pediatrics. 2013 Feb;131(2):e455-62 [PMID: 23319529]
  8. Acta Derm Venereol. 2019 Feb 1;99(2):133-138 [PMID: 30320871]
  9. PLoS One. 2016 Dec 22;11(12):e0167270 [PMID: 28005984]
  10. J Perinatol. 2010 Dec;30(12):773-9 [PMID: 20357810]
  11. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2009 Mar;25(3):139-44 [PMID: 19262421]
  12. Pediatrics. 2019 Mar;143(3): [PMID: 30814271]
  13. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Jan;51(1):136-49 [PMID: 23384695]
  14. Paediatr Child Health. 2009 Jan;14(1):19-23 [PMID: 19436459]
  15. BMJ. 2003 Oct 4;327(7418):785-9 [PMID: 14525877]
  16. Arch Dis Child. 2011 Apr;96(4):330-4 [PMID: 21233084]
  17. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 04;21(3):e13000 [PMID: 30829576]
  18. JAMA. 2011 Sep 7;306(9):978-88 [PMID: 21900138]
  19. Matern Child Health J. 2008 Sep;12(5):662-9 [PMID: 17713847]
  20. Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Feb;37:59-65 [PMID: 26655857]
  21. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2014 Jul;44(6):150-63 [PMID: 24981664]
  22. Cureus. 2016 Feb 09;8(2):e486 [PMID: 27014520]
  23. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Sep 4;95(17):e1261-7 [PMID: 24005210]
  24. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Apr 24;21(4):e12968 [PMID: 31017584]
  25. Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2014 Jun;22(5):477-85 [PMID: 25137864]
  26. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Dec 19;14:135 [PMID: 25524443]
  27. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Feb 14;21(2):e12913 [PMID: 30762583]
  28. J Asthma. 2010 Apr;47(3):245-50 [PMID: 20394510]
  29. Acad Med. 2010 May;85(5):909-22 [PMID: 20520049]
  30. BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c869 [PMID: 20332511]
  31. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 28;21(3):e12994 [PMID: 30920375]
  32. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 22;21(1):e12959 [PMID: 30668519]
  33. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Feb 12;21(2):e12937 [PMID: 30747711]
  34. Paediatr Child Health. 2007 Jul;12(6):461-464 [PMID: 19030408]
  35. Teach Learn Med. 2012;24(4):327-33 [PMID: 23036000]
  36. Reprod Health. 2014;11 Suppl 1:S4 [PMID: 25177974]
  37. Pediatrics. 2019 Mar;143(3): [PMID: 30824606]
  38. Pediatrics. 2010 Mar;125(3):539-46 [PMID: 20156896]
  39. ANZ J Surg. 2007 Jan-Feb;77(1-2):54-9 [PMID: 17295822]
  40. Arch Dis Child. 2011 Dec;96(12):1191-4 [PMID: 22080459]
  41. Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Oct;99(10):1620-5 [PMID: 27228899]
  42. J Glob Health. 2014 Jun;4(1):010406 [PMID: 24976965]
  43. J Paediatr Child Health. 2016 Feb;52(2):126-30 [PMID: 27062614]
  44. Hum Resour Health. 2009 Apr 08;7:30 [PMID: 19356239]
  45. JAMA Pediatr. 2019 May 1;173(5):477-484 [PMID: 30830204]
  46. Paediatr Anaesth. 2016 Apr;26(4):392-8 [PMID: 26714736]

MeSH Term

Bias
Computer-Assisted Instruction
Education, Continuing
Education, Distance
Education, Medical, Continuing
Education, Nursing, Continuing
Health Personnel
Humans
Learning
Manikins
Midwifery
Mobile Applications
Pediatrics
Virtual Reality

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0educationlearningdigitalstudiestraditionalmannequinsDigitalinterventionstudyeffectivehealthpediatricsassessedincludedevidencepostregistrationknowledgereviewcomparedeffectsrandomizedcontrolledtrialsreportedoutcomesskillfoundtrainersnecessarytechnologiesskillssatisfactionbehaviorchangesystematicriskbiasauthorsinformationqualityincludinghigh-fidelity1controlHigh-fidelitylow-fidelitydifference0HealthEducationBACKGROUND:ReducingchildhoodmorbiditymortalitychallengingparticularlycountriesshortagequalifiedcareworkersLackmakesdifficultprovidecontinuingprofessionalsteachingmeanspotentialdelivermedicallargeaudiencelimitingnumberneededOBJECTIVE:goalresearchevaluatewhethercanreplaceimproveprofessionals'attitudesfosterfieldMETHODS:completedliteraturefollowingCochranemethodologysearched7majorelectronicdatabasesarticlespublishedJanuary1990August2017languagerestrictionsappliedindependentlyselectedextracteddatapairscontactedadditionalpooledanalysesbasedrandommodelsindividuallyclusterformsusingGradingRecommendationsAssessmentDevelopmentEvaluationsGRADEcriteriaRESULTS:Twenty1382participantsParticipantspediatriciansphysiciansnursesmidwives6computer-based12mobilevirtualrealityeitherattitudeassociatedhigherpostinterventionscoresstandardizedmean6295%CI17-106moderateeffectsizelow-qualityOnephysicianpracticingsimilarofflineplusonlineimpactpatientoutcomegroupsNoneadverseuntowardeconomicinterventionsmainlyunclearhighlowdueinconsistencieslimitationsimprecisionacrossCONCLUSIONS:professionsleastimprovingComputer-basedoffline/onlinebettergoodface-to-facehighlightsgapscallingmethodologicallyrigoroustopicTRIALREGISTRATION:PROSPEROCRD42017057793https://tinyurlcom/y5q9q5o6ProfessionsFieldPediatrics:SystematicReviewMeta-AnalysisCollaborationmeta-analysis

Similar Articles

Cited By