Estimation of maize above-ground biomass based on stem-leaf separation strategy integrated with LiDAR and optical remote sensing data.

Yaohui Zhu, Chunjiang Zhao, Hao Yang, Guijun Yang, Liang Han, Zhenhai Li, Haikuan Feng, Bo Xu, Jintao Wu, Lei Lei
Author Information
  1. Yaohui Zhu: School of Information Science and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China. ORCID
  2. Chunjiang Zhao: School of Information Science and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
  3. Hao Yang: Key Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing in Agriculture of Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing, China.
  4. Guijun Yang: Key Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing in Agriculture of Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing, China.
  5. Liang Han: Key Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing in Agriculture of Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing, China.
  6. Zhenhai Li: Key Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing in Agriculture of Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing, China.
  7. Haikuan Feng: Key Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing in Agriculture of Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing, China.
  8. Bo Xu: Key Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing in Agriculture of Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing, China.
  9. Jintao Wu: Key Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing in Agriculture of Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing, China.
  10. Lei Lei: Key Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing in Agriculture of Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing, China.

Abstract

Above-ground biomass (AGB) is an important indicator for effectively assessing crop growth and yield and, in addition, is an important ecological indicator for assessing the efficiency with which crops use light and store carbon in ecosystems. However, most existing methods using optical remote sensing to estimate AGB cannot observe structures below the maize canopy, which may lead to poor estimation accuracy. This paper proposes to use the stem-leaf separation strategy integrated with unmanned aerial vehicle LiDAR and multispectral image data to estimate the AGB in maize. First, the correlation matrix was used to screen optimal the LiDAR structural parameters (LSPs) and the spectral vegetation indices (SVIs). According to the screened indicators, the SVIs and the LSPs were subjected to multivariable linear regression (MLR) with the above-ground leaf biomass (AGLB) and above-ground stem biomass (AGSB), respectively. At the same time, all SVIs derived from multispectral data and all LSPs derived from LiDAR data were subjected to partial least squares regression (PLSR) with the AGLB and AGSB, respectively. Finally, the AGB was computed by adding the AGLB and the AGSB, and each was estimated by using the MLR and the PLSR methods, respectively. The results indicate a strong correlation between the estimated and field-observed AGB using the MLR method ( = 0.82, RMSE = 79.80 g/m, NRMSE = 11.12%) and the PLSR method ( = 0.86, RMSE = 72.28 g/m, NRMSE = 10.07%). The results indicate that PLSR more accurately estimates AGB than MLR, with increasing by 0.04, root mean square error (RMSE) decreasing by 7.52 g/m, and normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) decreasing by 1.05%. In addition, the AGB is more accurately estimated by combining LiDAR with multispectral data than LiDAR and multispectral data alone, with increasing by 0.13 and 0.30, respectively, RMSE decreasing by 22.89 and 54.92 g/m, respectively, and NRMSE decreasing by 4.46% and 7.65%, respectively. This study improves the prediction accuracy of AGB and provides a new guideline for monitoring based on the fusion of multispectral and LiDAR data.

Keywords

References

  1. Sensors (Basel). 2013 Aug 06;13(8):10027-51 [PMID: 23925082]
  2. Front Plant Sci. 2017 Sep 08;8:1532 [PMID: 28951735]
  3. PeerJ. 2018 May 3;6:e4703 [PMID: 29736341]
  4. Front Plant Sci. 2017 Jun 30;8:1111 [PMID: 28713402]
  5. Plant Methods. 2015 Feb 25;11:9 [PMID: 25793008]
  6. Plant Methods. 2019 Feb 4;15:10 [PMID: 30740136]
  7. Front Plant Sci. 2016 May 18;7:666 [PMID: 27242867]
  8. Front Plant Sci. 2017 Nov 27;8:2002 [PMID: 29230229]
  9. Front Plant Sci. 2017 Nov 27;8:2004 [PMID: 29230230]
  10. Plant Methods. 2018 Jul 4;14:53 [PMID: 29997682]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0AGBLiDARdatarespectively=biomassmultispectral0MLRPLSRRMSEg/mNRMSEdecreasingusingmaizeLSPsSVIsabove-groundAGLBAGSBestimatedAbove-groundimportantindicatorassessingadditionusemethodsopticalremotesensingestimateaccuracystem-leafseparationstrategyintegratedaerialvehicleimagecorrelationsubjectedregressionderivedresultsindicatemethodaccuratelyincreasingrootmeansquareerror7basedeffectivelycropgrowthyieldecologicalefficiencycropslightstorecarbonecosystemsHoweverexistingobservestructurescanopymayleadpoorestimationpaperproposesunmannedFirstmatrixusedscreenoptimalstructuralparametersspectralvegetationindicesAccordingscreenedindicatorsmultivariablelinearleafstemtimepartialleastsquaresFinallycomputedaddingstrongfield-observed8279801112%8672281007%estimates0452normalized105%combiningalone133022895492446%65%studyimprovespredictionprovidesnewguidelinemonitoringfusionEstimationMaizeMultispectralUnmanned

Similar Articles

Cited By