Social Support and Common Dyadic Coping in Couples' Dyadic Management of Type II Diabetes: Protocol for an Ambulatory Assessment Application.

Janina Lüscher, Tobias Kowatsch, George Boateng, Prabhakaran Santhanam, Guy Bodenmann, Urte Scholz
Author Information
  1. Janina Lüscher: Applied Social and Health Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. ORCID
  2. Tobias Kowatsch: Institute of Technology Management, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland. ORCID
  3. George Boateng: Department of Management, Technology, and Economics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. ORCID
  4. Prabhakaran Santhanam: Department of Management, Technology, and Economics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. ORCID
  5. Guy Bodenmann: Clinical Psychology for Children/Adolescents and Couples/Families, Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. ORCID
  6. Urte Scholz: Applied Social and Health Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a common chronic disease. To manage blood glucose levels, patients need to follow medical recommendations for healthy eating, physical activity, and medication adherence in their everyday life. Illness management is mainly shared with partners and involves social support and common dyadic coping (CDC). Social support and CDC have been identified as having implications for people's health behavior and well-being. Visible support, however, may also be negatively related to people's well-being. Thus, the concept of invisible support was introduced. It is unknown which of these concepts (ie, visible support, invisible support, and CDC) displays the most beneficial associations with health behavior and well-being when considered together in the context of illness management in couple's everyday life. Therefore, a novel ambulatory assessment application for the open-source behavioral intervention platform MobileCoach (AAMC) was developed. It uses objective sensor data in combination with self-reports in couple's everyday life.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper is to describe the design of the Dyadic Management of diabetes (DyMand) study, funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (CR12I1_166348/1). The study was approved by the cantonal ethics committee of the Canton of Zurich, Switzerland (Req-2017_00430).
METHODS: This study follows an intensive longitudinal design with 2 phases of data collection. The first phase is a naturalistic observation phase of couples' conversations in combination with experience sampling in their daily lives, with plans to follow 180 T2DM patients and their partners using sensor data from smartwatches, mobile phones, and accelerometers for 7 consecutive days. The second phase is an observational study in the laboratory, where couples discuss topics related to their diabetes management. The second phase complements the first phase by focusing on the assessment of a full discussion about diabetes-related concerns. Participants are heterosexual couples with 1 partner having a diagnosis of T2DM.
RESULTS: The AAMC was designed and built until the end of 2018 and internally tested in March 2019. In May 2019, the enrollment of the pilot phase began. The data collection of the DyMand study will begin in September 2019, and analysis and presentation of results will be available in 2021.
CONCLUSIONS: For further research and practice, it is crucial to identify the impact of social support and CDC on couples' dyadic management of T2DM and their well-being in daily life. Using AAMC will make a key contribution with regard to objective operationalizations of visible and invisible support, CDC, physical activity, and well-being. Findings will provide a sound basis for theory- and evidence-based development of dyadic interventions to change health behavior in the context of couple's dyadic illness management. Challenges to this multimodal sensor approach and its feasibility aspects are discussed.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/13685.

Keywords

References

  1. Ann Behav Med. 2019 May 3;53(6):527-540 [PMID: 30060071]
  2. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Jul 26;6(7):e10206 [PMID: 30049667]
  3. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Nov;39(11):1441-54 [PMID: 23885036]
  4. Annu Rev Public Health. 2018 Apr 1;39:367-384 [PMID: 29608869]
  5. BMC Med Genomics. 2011 Apr 08;4:31 [PMID: 21477282]
  6. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013 Dec;15(12):2022-8 [PMID: 23943846]
  7. J Fam Nurs. 2013 Feb;19(1):3-28 [PMID: 23288886]
  8. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2017 Jan;21(1):218-227 [PMID: 26441432]
  9. Br J Health Psychol. 2010 Nov;15(Pt 4):859-70 [PMID: 20178694]
  10. Behav Res Ther. 2014 Dec;63:139-46 [PMID: 25461789]
  11. Health Psychol. 2013 Oct;32(10):1029-37 [PMID: 23025302]
  12. Health Psychol. 2010 Mar;29(2):169-80 [PMID: 20230090]
  13. Br J Health Psychol. 2010 Feb;15(Pt 1):1-39 [PMID: 19646331]
  14. Health Educ Res. 2010 Apr;25(2):211-23 [PMID: 18559399]
  15. J Telemed Telecare. 2018 Aug 1;:1357633X18790170 [PMID: 30068250]
  16. Int J Behav Med. 2014 Apr;21(2):230-9 [PMID: 23436184]
  17. J Fam Psychol. 2006 Jun;20(2):311-8 [PMID: 16756407]
  18. Psychol Health. 2015;30(7):783-802 [PMID: 25471820]
  19. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Dec;79(6):953-61 [PMID: 11138764]
  20. Psychol Sci. 2009 Aug;20(8):928-32 [PMID: 19549083]
  21. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 May;94(5):824-38 [PMID: 18444741]
  22. Ann Behav Med. 2018 May 18;52(6):446-462 [PMID: 27663578]
  23. BMC Public Health. 2014 Dec 24;14:1321 [PMID: 25540972]
  24. Health Psychol. 2005 Nov;24(6):617-622 [PMID: 16287408]
  25. Soc Sci Med. 2006 Mar;62(6):1369-80 [PMID: 16146666]
  26. J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):71-5 [PMID: 16367493]
  27. Sensors (Basel). 2013 Dec 16;13(12):17292-321 [PMID: 24351637]
  28. Br J Health Psychol. 2015 Nov;20(4):708-23 [PMID: 25728302]
  29. PLoS One. 2016 Feb 05;11(2):e0148037 [PMID: 26849361]
  30. Br J Health Psychol. 2015 Feb;20(1):85-114 [PMID: 24628822]
  31. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 Nov;36(11):1496-513 [PMID: 20858888]
  32. Fam Process. 2012 Mar;51(1):107-21 [PMID: 22428714]
  33. Psychol Assess. 2015 Mar;27(1):169-83 [PMID: 25346997]
  34. Health Psychol. 2013 Jul;32(7):739-47 [PMID: 22708518]
  35. Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Apr 1;46(2):578-588 [PMID: 27524815]
  36. J Behav Med. 2014 Oct;37(5):828-38 [PMID: 24113912]
  37. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 Jun;36(6):780-91 [PMID: 20445023]
  38. Psychol Med. 2018 Jan;48(2):208-228 [PMID: 28641609]
  39. Transl Behav Med. 2011 Sep 1;1(3):461-467 [PMID: 22003374]
  40. J Fam Psychol. 2013 Oct;27(5):722-730 [PMID: 24015707]
  41. Ther Umsch. 2009 Oct;66(10):685-93 [PMID: 19830676]
  42. Sports Med. 2014 May;44(5):671-86 [PMID: 24497157]
  43. Interact Comput. 2010 Jul 1;22(4):289-298 [PMID: 20628581]
  44. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Jan;98(1):47-56 [PMID: 20053030]
  45. Psychol Health. 2013 Jan;29(1):16-31 [PMID: 23875937]
  46. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 Jan;32(1):52-65 [PMID: 16317188]
  47. Soc Sci Med. 2012 Apr;74(7):949-57 [PMID: 22326104]
  48. J Fam Psychol. 2014 Jun;28(3):380-90 [PMID: 24730380]
  49. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2013 Jul;5(2):270-90 [PMID: 23625820]
  50. Diabetes Care. 1992 Apr;15(4):469-77 [PMID: 1499460]
  51. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Sep 21;4(3):e111 [PMID: 27655245]
  52. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91 [PMID: 17695343]
  53. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Mar;92(3):458-75 [PMID: 17352603]
  54. Stress Health. 2015 Dec;31(5):351-64 [PMID: 24449558]
  55. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2017 Aug;25(8):1336-1342 [PMID: 28600833]
  56. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010 Jul;12(7):695-707 [PMID: 20513695]
  57. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2005 Sep-Oct;37(5):226-34 [PMID: 16053810]
  58. Schizophr Res. 2000 May 5;42(3):241-7 [PMID: 10785582]
  59. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Mar 22;20(3):e106 [PMID: 29567638]
  60. Health Psychol. 2009 May;28(3):273-82 [PMID: 19450032]
  61. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2017 Sep;68(6):656-670 [PMID: 28139173]
  62. Health Psychol. 2011 Nov;30(6):789-92 [PMID: 21574707]
  63. Can J Diabetes. 2019 Feb;43(1):51-58.e3 [PMID: 30026048]
  64. Fam Relat. 2012 Oct 1;61(4):698-709 [PMID: 23144525]
  65. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2017 May;30(3):273-281 [PMID: 27931112]
  66. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2001 Nov;33(4):517-23 [PMID: 11816455]
  67. Psychol Sci. 2010 Dec;21(12):1878-85 [PMID: 21097721]
  68. Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9 [PMID: 19565683]
  69. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008 Oct;76(5):781-9 [PMID: 18837595]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0supportmanagementdyadicstudyphaseCDCwell-beingdataT2DMlifesensorwillIIdiabetescommoneverydaysocialhealthbehaviorinvisibleillnesscouple'sassessmentAAMCDyadiccouples2019TypepatientsfollowphysicalactivitypartnerscopingSocialpeople'srelatedvisiblecontextambulatoryapplicationMobileCoachobjectivecombinationdesignManagementDyMandcollectionfirstcouples'dailymobilesecondmultimodalBACKGROUND:mellituschronicdiseasemanagebloodglucoselevelsneedmedicalrecommendationshealthyeatingmedicationadherenceIllnessmainlysharedinvolvesidentifiedimplicationsVisiblehowevermayalsonegativelyThusconceptintroducedunknownconceptsiedisplaysbeneficialassociationsconsideredtogetherThereforenovelopen-sourcebehavioralinterventionplatformdevelopedusesself-reportsOBJECTIVE:aimpaperdescribeDiabetesfundedSwissNationalScienceFoundationCR12I1_166348/1approvedcantonalethicscommitteeCantonZurichSwitzerlandReq-2017_00430METHODS:followsintensivelongitudinal2phasesnaturalisticobservationconversationsexperiencesamplinglivesplans180usingsmartwatchesphonesaccelerometers7consecutivedaysobservationallaboratorydiscusstopicscomplementsfocusingfulldiscussiondiabetes-relatedconcernsParticipantsheterosexual1partnerdiagnosisRESULTS:designedbuiltend2018internallytestedMarchMayenrollmentpilotbeganbeginSeptemberanalysispresentationresultsavailable2021CONCLUSIONS:researchpracticecrucialidentifyimpactUsingmakekeycontributionregardoperationalizationsFindingsprovidesoundbasistheory-evidence-baseddevelopmentinterventionschangeChallengesapproachfeasibilityaspectsdiscussedINTERNATIONALREGISTEREDREPORTIDENTIFIERIRRID:PRR1-102196/13685SupportCommonCopingCouples'Diabetes:ProtocolAmbulatoryAssessmentApplicationsensingprotocoltype

Similar Articles

Cited By