Using Patient and Family Engagement Strategies to Improve Outcomes of Health Information Technology Initiatives: Scoping Review.

Kevin Leung, Drew Lu-McLean, Craig Kuziemsky, Richard G Booth, Sarah Collins Rossetti, Elizabeth Borycki, Gillian Strudwick
Author Information
  1. Kevin Leung: Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada. ORCID
  2. Drew Lu-McLean: McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. ORCID
  3. Craig Kuziemsky: University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. ORCID
  4. Richard G Booth: Western University, London, ON, Canada. ORCID
  5. Sarah Collins Rossetti: Columbia University, New York, NY, United States. ORCID
  6. Elizabeth Borycki: University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada. ORCID
  7. Gillian Strudwick: Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many health care organizations around the world have implemented health information technologies (ITs) to enhance health service efficiency, effectiveness, and safety. Studies have demonstrated that promising outcomes of health IT initiatives can be obtained when patients and family members participate and engage in the adoption, use, and evaluation of these technologies. Despite knowing this, there is a lack of health care organizations using patient and family engagement strategies to enhance the use and adoption of health ITs, specifically.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to answer the following three research questions (RQs): (1) what current frameworks or theories have been used to guide patient and family engagement in health IT adoption, use, implementation, selection, and evaluation?, (2) what studies have been done on patient and family engagement strategies in health IT adoption, use, implementation, selection, and evaluation?, and (3) what patient and family engagement frameworks, studies, or resources identified in the literature can be applied to health IT adoption, use, implementation, selection, and evaluation?
METHODS: This scoping review used a five-step framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley and adapted by Levac et al. These steps include the following: (1) identifying the RQ, (2) identifying relevant studies, (3) selecting studies, (4) charting relevant data, and (5) summarizing and reporting the result. Retrieved academic and grey literature records were evaluated using a literature review software based on inclusion and exclusion criteria by two independent reviewers. If consensus was not achieved, two reviewers would resolve conflicts by discussion. Research findings and strategies were extracted from the studies and summarized in data tables.
RESULTS: A total of 35 academic articles and 23 gray literature documents met the inclusion criteria. In total, 20 of the 35 included studies have been published since 2017. Frameworks found include the patient engagement framework developed by Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society and the patient and family engagement framework proposed by Carman et al. Effective strategies include providing patients with clear expectations and responsibilities and providing reimbursement for time and travel. The gray literature sources outlined key considerations for planning and supporting engagement initiatives such as providing patients with professional development opportunities, and embedding patients in existing governance structures.
CONCLUSIONS: Several studies have reported their findings regarding successful strategies to engage patients and family members in health IT initiatives and the positive impact that can emerge when patients and family members are engaged in such initiatives in an effective manner. Currently, no framework has consolidated all of the key strategies and considerations that were found in this review to guide health care organizations when engaging patients and family members in a health IT-specific project or initiative. Further research to evaluate and validate the existing strategies would be of value.

Keywords

References

  1. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Sep-Oct;16(5):683-9 [PMID: 19567790]
  2. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 May 16;7(10):889-903 [PMID: 30316241]
  3. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;191:9-17 [PMID: 23792833]
  4. J Health Care Finance. 2013 Winter;40(2):17-41 [PMID: 24551960]
  5. Med Care. 2018 Oct;56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1:S58-S63 [PMID: 30074953]
  6. J Med Internet Res. 2016 Nov 16;18(11):e294 [PMID: 27852556]
  7. Inform Health Soc Care. 2008 Sep;33(3):158-69 [PMID: 18850399]
  8. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016 Dec;138(6):1512-1517 [PMID: 27744029]
  9. Am J Manag Care. 2018 Nov 1;24(11):e352-e357 [PMID: 30452203]
  10. Comput Inform Nurs. 2013 Oct;31(10):457-62 [PMID: 24135882]
  11. J Med Syst. 2018 Jul 16;42(9):158 [PMID: 30014267]
  12. JMIR Form Res. 2018 Nov 22;2(2):e22 [PMID: 30684436]
  13. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011 Nov 24;11:73 [PMID: 22115059]
  14. JAMIA Open. 2018 May 23;1(2):130-135 [PMID: 31984326]
  15. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2011 Nov;28:1-18 [PMID: 22164356]
  16. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 23;17(6):e148 [PMID: 26104044]
  17. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Sep 01;24(5):903-912 [PMID: 28340229]
  18. Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 21;10:53 [PMID: 25895742]
  19. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):223-31 [PMID: 23381514]
  20. JAMIA Open. 2018 Sep 19;2(1):35-39 [PMID: 31984343]
  21. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Nov 21;18(1):108 [PMID: 30463613]
  22. J Comp Eff Res. 2015 Mar;4(2):133-45 [PMID: 25825842]
  23. Int J Med Inform. 2008 May;77(5):291-304 [PMID: 17951106]
  24. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Nov 07;20(11):e11350 [PMID: 30404771]
  25. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Oct 1;20(10):e269 [PMID: 30287416]
  26. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Mar 30;19(3):e99 [PMID: 28360022]
  27. Health Expect. 2018 Dec;21(6):944-949 [PMID: 29858526]
  28. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019;257:110-114 [PMID: 30741182]
  29. BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Aug 24;17(1):51 [PMID: 27553007]
  30. J Med Syst. 2017 Jul;41(7):105 [PMID: 28540617]
  31. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Dec;31(12):2805-16 [PMID: 23154997]
  32. Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Feb 7;16(1):5 [PMID: 29415734]
  33. Health Expect. 2016 Aug;19(4):817-27 [PMID: 26113295]
  34. PLoS Med. 2013;10(1):e1001362 [PMID: 23349621]
  35. Implement Sci. 2010 Sep 20;5:69 [PMID: 20854677]
  36. J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 Sep-Oct;28(5):632-8 [PMID: 26355135]
  37. Digit Health. 2018 Sep 02;4:2055207618797883 [PMID: 30186619]
  38. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Dec 1;25(12):1626-1633 [PMID: 30346543]
  39. Can Fam Physician. 2015 Dec;61(12):1076-84 [PMID: 27035020]
  40. Med Care. 2018 Oct;56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1:S22-S26 [PMID: 30074947]
  41. Med Care. 2018 Oct;56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1:S33-S40 [PMID: 30074949]
  42. Clin Nurse Spec. 2013 Sep-Oct;27(5):221-3 [PMID: 23942098]
  43. Int J Med Inform. 2017 Sep;105:31-37 [PMID: 28750909]
  44. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007 Mar 1;64(5):536-43 [PMID: 17322168]
  45. Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):396-406 [PMID: 28984405]
  46. Comput Inform Nurs. 2018 Feb;36(2):90-97 [PMID: 28901967]
  47. Value Health. 2018 Apr;21(4):386-393 [PMID: 29680093]
  48. Med Care. 2018 Oct;56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1:S11-S15 [PMID: 30074943]

Grants

  1. /CIHR

MeSH Term

Family
Humans
Medical Informatics
Patient Participation

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0healthfamilyengagementpatientspatientstrategiesstudiesITadoptionuseliteratureinitiativesmembersframeworkcareorganizationscanimplementationselectionreviewincludeprovidinginformationtechnologiesITsenhanceengageusingresearch1frameworksusedguideevaluation?23developedetalidentifyingrelevantdataacademicinclusioncriteriatworeviewersfindingstotal35grayfoundInformationkeyconsiderationsexistinginformaticsBACKGROUND:ManyaroundworldimplementedserviceefficiencyeffectivenesssafetyStudiesdemonstratedpromisingoutcomesobtainedparticipateevaluationDespiteknowinglackspecificallyOBJECTIVE:studyaimedanswerfollowingthreequestionsRQs:currenttheoriesdoneresourcesidentifiedappliedevaluation?METHODS:scopingfive-stepArkseyO'MalleyadaptedLevacstepsfollowing:RQselecting4charting5summarizingreportingresultRetrievedgreyrecordsevaluatedsoftwarebasedexclusionindependentconsensusachievedresolveconflictsdiscussionResearchextractedsummarizedtablesRESULTS:articles23documentsmet20includedpublishedsince2017FrameworksHealthcareManagementSystemsSocietyproposedCarmanEffectiveclearexpectationsresponsibilitiesreimbursementtimetravelsourcesoutlinedplanningsupportingprofessionaldevelopmentopportunitiesembeddinggovernancestructuresCONCLUSIONS:SeveralreportedregardingsuccessfulpositiveimpactemergeengagedeffectivemannerCurrentlyconsolidatedengagingIT-specificprojectinitiativeevaluatevalidatevalueUsingPatientFamilyEngagementStrategiesImproveOutcomesHealthTechnologyInitiatives:ScopingReviewtechnologyservicesmedical

Similar Articles

Cited By