Arterial Stiffness and Indices of Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction in Patients with Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Etiology.

Paulina Gąsiorek, Agata Sakowicz, Maciej Banach, Stephan von Haehling, Agata Bielecka-Dabrowa
Author Information
  1. Paulina Gąsiorek: Department of Neurology and Ischemic Strokes, Medical University of Lodz, Zeromskiego 113, 90-549 Lodz, Poland. ORCID
  2. Agata Sakowicz: Department of Medical Biotechnology, Medical University of Lodz, Poland. ORCID
  3. Maciej Banach: Department of Hypertension, Chair of Nephrology and Hypertension, Medical University of Lodz, Poland. ORCID
  4. Stephan von Haehling: Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, University of Göttingen Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
  5. Agata Bielecka-Dabrowa: Department of Hypertension, Chair of Nephrology and Hypertension, Medical University of Lodz, Poland.

Abstract

PURPOSE: The study is aimed at identifying echocardiographic and circulating biomarkers as well as hemodynamic indices of embolic stroke of undetermined etiology (ESUS) in patients aged <65.
METHODS: We prospectively investigated 520 patients with confirmed ischemic stroke and selected those 65 patients who were diagnosed with ESUS (age 54 (47-58) years, 42% male). An additional 36 without stroke but with a similar risk profile were included as a control group (age 53 (47-58) years, 61% male). All patients underwent echocardiography, noninvasive assessment of hemodynamic parameters using a SphygmoCor tonometer (AtCor Med., Australia), and measurements of selected biomarkers.
RESULTS: ESUS patients and controls were well matched for baseline characteristics including blood pressure and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Compared to controls, patients with ESUS had lower mean early diastolic (') and systolic (') mitral annular velocities and a higher ratio of the peak velocity of early diastolic transmitral flow to the peak velocity of early diastolic mitral annular motion (all < 0.01). The peak velocity flow in the late diastole (A wave) value and LV mass indexed to the body surface area (LVMI) (g/m) were higher in the ESUS group than in the control group (both < 0.01). The isovolumetric relaxation time (IVRT) was longer and the mean left atrial volume index (LAVI) was higher in ESUS patients compared to the control group. Parameters of arterial stiffness such as augmentation pressure, augmentation index, and augmentation index adjusted to a heart rate of 75 bpm (AIx75) were higher in ESUS patients compared to controls ( < 0.05). Patients in the ESUS group had higher levels of asymmetric dimethylarginine, interleukin 6, and N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP, all < 0.05) than those in the control group. In multivariate analysis, the following factors were significantly associated with the presence of ESUS: AIx75 (odds ratio (OR) 1.095, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.004-1.194; = 0.04), IVRT (OR 1.045, 95% CI: 1.009-1.082; = 0.014), LAVI (OR 1.3, 95% CI: 1.099-1.537; = 0.002), and NT-proBNP (OR 1.003, 95% CI: 1.001-1.005; = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: Increased arterial stiffness and indices of diastolic dysfunction as well as a higher NT-proBNP level are significantly associated with ESUS. These parameters require further scrutiny over time to understand their impact on the development of symptomatic heart failure. The ClinicalTrials.gov identifier is NCT03377465.

Associated Data

ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT03377465

References

  1. J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Sep;26(3):135-143 [PMID: 30310880]
  2. Atherosclerosis. 2016 Aug;251:1-5 [PMID: 27214693]
  3. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018 May;27(5):1275-1282 [PMID: 29310958]
  4. J Hypertens. 2011 Jul;29(7):1422-30 [PMID: 21577137]
  5. Eur J Neurol. 2014 Mar;21(3):463-9 [PMID: 24330330]
  6. Pulse (Basel). 2016 Jul;4(1):24-7 [PMID: 27493900]
  7. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Dec 11;60(23):2349-56 [PMID: 23141494]
  8. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 Nov 3;16(1):209 [PMID: 27809773]
  9. Int J Cardiol. 2017 Sep 15;243:466-470 [PMID: 28747037]
  10. Stroke. 2017 Apr;48(4):867-872 [PMID: 28265016]
  11. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014 Feb;23(2):259-66 [PMID: 23473623]
  12. Int J Cardiol. 2016 Oct 15;221:1073-80 [PMID: 27448535]
  13. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017 May;26(5):922-929 [PMID: 28007328]
  14. Schizophr Res. 2018 Sep;199:403-406 [PMID: 29602642]
  15. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2017 Mar 17;2(2):65-72 [PMID: 28959494]
  16. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Feb 18;63(6):493-505 [PMID: 24291276]
  17. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 Oct;19(10):1303-1309 [PMID: 28738140]
  18. Neuromolecular Med. 2018 Sep;20(3):301-311 [PMID: 29744773]
  19. ESC Heart Fail. 2015 Mar;2(1):1-4 [PMID: 28834645]
  20. Heart Fail Rev. 2014 May;19(3):305-13 [PMID: 24445936]
  21. Hypertens Res. 2015 Oct;38(10):675-83 [PMID: 25787040]
  22. J Hypertens. 2016 Sep;34(9):1838-45 [PMID: 27379539]
  23. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2018 Mar;38(2):507-515 [PMID: 28488007]
  24. Lancet Neurol. 2014 Apr;13(4):429-38 [PMID: 24646875]
  25. Int J Stroke. 2015 Oct;10 Suppl A100:165 [PMID: 26502974]
  26. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2016 Jan;29(1):1-42 [PMID: 26765302]
  27. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2018 Jul 6;20(9):76 [PMID: 29980951]
  28. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2010 Nov;8(6):747-52 [PMID: 20626340]
  29. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2010 Oct;31(10):1267-76 [PMID: 20802505]
  30. Adv Med Sci. 2019 Jun 28;64(2):381-387 [PMID: 31260841]
  31. Sci Rep. 2015 Mar 09;5:8916 [PMID: 25747153]
  32. Cardiol J. 2018 May 02;:null [PMID: 29718528]
  33. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2018 Oct;15(5):287-296 [PMID: 30062623]
  34. J Stroke. 2016 Sep;18(3):304-311 [PMID: 27733026]
  35. Ann Med. 2013 Feb;45(1):37-50 [PMID: 22413912]
  36. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Dec;17(12):1321-1360 [PMID: 27422899]
  37. Eur Heart J. 2017 Mar 7;38(10):742-750 [PMID: 28426886]
  38. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2017 Jul;2017:1356-1359 [PMID: 29060128]
  39. Clin Cardiol. 2018 Mar;41(3):426-432 [PMID: 29569253]
  40. Lancet. 2014 Jan 18;383(9913):245-54 [PMID: 24449944]
  41. ARYA Atheroscler. 2017 Nov;13(6):299-303 [PMID: 29643926]
  42. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;(6):CD003336 [PMID: 22696335]
  43. J Clin Neurosci. 2014 Jul;21(7):1220-4 [PMID: 24855972]

MeSH Term

Arginine
Biomarkers
Case-Control Studies
Diastole
Echocardiography
Female
Humans
Interleukin-6
Intracranial Embolism
Male
Middle Aged
Mitral Valve
Multivariate Analysis
Natriuretic Peptide, Brain
Peptide Fragments
Prospective Studies
Risk Factors
Stroke
Stroke Volume
Systole
Vascular Stiffness
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Chemicals

Biomarkers
IL6 protein, human
Interleukin-6
Peptide Fragments
pro-brain natriuretic peptide (1-76)
Natriuretic Peptide, Brain
N,N-dimethylarginine
Arginine

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0ESUSpatients01grouphighercontroldiastolic<OR95%=wellstrokecontrolsearlypeakvelocityindexaugmentationNT-proBNPCI:biomarkershemodynamicindicesselectedage47-58yearsmaleparameterspressureleftmean'mitralannularratioflow01timeIVRTLAVIcomparedarterialstiffnessheartAIx7505Patientssignificantlyassociated005PURPOSE:studyaimedidentifyingechocardiographiccirculatingembolicundeterminedetiologyaged<65METHODS:prospectivelyinvestigated520confirmedischemic65diagnosed5442%additional36withoutsimilarriskprofileincluded5361%underwentechocardiographynoninvasiveassessmentusingSphygmoCortonometerAtCorMedAustraliameasurementsRESULTS:matchedbaselinecharacteristicsincludingbloodventricularejectionfractionLVEFComparedlowersystolicvelocitiestransmitralmotionlatediastolewavevalueLVmassindexedbodysurfaceareaLVMIg/misovolumetricrelaxationlongeratrialvolumeParametersadjustedrate75 bpmlevelsasymmetricdimethylarginineinterleukin6N-terminalprobrainnatriureticpeptidemultivariateanalysisfollowingfactorspresenceESUS:odds095confidenceintervalCI004-119404045009-10820143099-1537002003001-1CONCLUSIONS:IncreaseddysfunctionlevelrequirescrutinyunderstandimpactdevelopmentsymptomaticfailureClinicalTrialsgovidentifierNCT03377465ArterialStiffnessIndicesLeftVentricularDiastolicDysfunctionEmbolicStrokeUndeterminedEtiology

Similar Articles

Cited By