Risk Management of Dairy Product Losses as a Tool to Improve the Environment and Food Rescue.

Beata Bilska, Danuta Kołożyn-Krajewska
Author Information
  1. Beata Bilska: Department of Food Gastronomy and Food Hygiene, Faculty of Human Nutrition and Consumer Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159C St., 02-776 Warsaw, Poland. beata_bilska@sggw.pl.
  2. Danuta Kołożyn-Krajewska: Department of Food Gastronomy and Food Hygiene, Faculty of Human Nutrition and Consumer Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159C St., 02-776 Warsaw, Poland. danuta_kolozyn_krajewska@sggw.pl.

Abstract

"Food loss", defined as food produced for human consumption, which for various reasons leaves the supply chain, can be assigned to a group of new risks. Irrational use of food constitutes a risk to the environment. Moreover, food losses represent a missed opportunity to improve global food security. The aim of this study was to develop a risk management model for dairy product losses using the example of ripening cheese. The necessary data to develop the model were derived from a survey that was conducted in five dairies located in Poland. Total losses for nine products amounted to 1.1% of the average annual production, which accounted for more than 5635 t per annum. The studies that were conducted allowed the identification of three management methods of food loss in dairies: reprocessing, hand over for feed, and disposal. The level of risk was defined as "high" with two suggested courses of action: prevention and tolerance. Risks must be prevented by eliminating any errors that may result in a product of inadequate quality. Another solution is to redistribute or sell products at a reduced price, which despite their reduced quality, are nevertheless suitable for consumption. To some extent, this risk must be tolerated.

Keywords

References

  1. J Food Prot. 2006 Nov;69(11):2697-702 [PMID: 17133814]
  2. Waste Manag. 2016 Feb;48:423-429 [PMID: 26691601]
  3. J Food Prot. 2008 Dec;71(12):2582-95 [PMID: 19244919]
  4. J Environ Manage. 2013 Nov 30;130:375-85 [PMID: 24121591]
  5. J Food Prot. 2006 Oct;69(10):2417-23 [PMID: 17066921]
  6. Waste Manag. 2016 Jun;52:269-77 [PMID: 27026493]
  7. Waste Manag. 2014 Jul;34(7):1306-16 [PMID: 24685399]
  8. Am J Prev Med. 2017 Aug;53(2):264-273 [PMID: 28457747]
  9. Waste Manag. 2017 Mar;61:461-472 [PMID: 28038904]
  10. Waste Manag. 2017 Oct;68:557-570 [PMID: 28688545]
  11. Public Health. 2017 Aug;149:113-119 [PMID: 28595063]
  12. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Sep 27;365(1554):3065-81 [PMID: 20713403]
  13. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2011 Nov;22(4):1279-91 [PMID: 22080709]
  14. Waste Manag. 2013 Mar;33(3):764-73 [PMID: 23270687]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0foodrisklossesmanagementproductsdefinedconsumptiondevelopmodeldairyproductconductedmustqualityreduced"Foodloss"producedhumanvariousreasonsleavessupplychaincanassignedgroupnewrisksIrrationaluseconstitutesenvironmentMoreoverrepresentmissedopportunityimproveglobalsecurityaimstudyusingexampleripeningcheesenecessarydataderivedsurveyfivedairieslocatedPolandTotalnineamounted11%averageannualproductionaccounted5635tperannumstudiesallowedidentificationthreemethodslossdairies:reprocessinghandfeeddisposallevel"high"twosuggestedcoursesaction:preventiontoleranceRiskspreventedeliminatingerrorsmayresultinadequateAnothersolutionredistributesellpricedespiteneverthelesssuitableextenttoleratedRiskManagementDairyProductLossesToolImproveEnvironmentFoodRescuebowtieanalysisrelationshipdiagramrescuenutrition

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)